User talk:Wangzumin
Spaces must be put in between words. Thank you. |
Do not create duplicate pages by copying and pasting. Please create one page per topic, instead of multiple pages for the same topic. For example, please create only one page for Ali Khan, not two pages for Ali khan and ALI KHAN. Creating duplicate pages will not help with search engine rankings and creates unnecessary additional workload for WikiAlpha volunteers. Thank you. |
Spam vs. encyclopedic articles
While WikiAlpha does not have notability policies, only encyclopedic articles are allowed. Nonsense spam like TỔNG QUAN VỀ WEB SEX VLXXVV.COM HAY NHẤT HIỆN NAY is not allowed. If you do this again, you will be blocked. WritingSnowman (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ask yourself this. Does it fit into a bách khoa toàn thư? A biography does. A company overview does. Nonsense spam does not. WritingSnowman (talk) 10:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you do not pay attention to warnings, you will be blocked. This is your final warning. WritingSnowman (talk) 13:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Final warning for disruptive behavior
Dear Wangzumin aka David Ferdex:
I repeat: Do not re-create spam pages.
You will be blocked if you continue to be disruptive. This is not proper SEO. This is called wasting volunteers' precious time and resources.
Please stop now. This is your final warning.
You are receiving this warning because:
The list of what is ALLOWED here is broad. Wikialpha:CSD lists the kind of material that is subject to deletion. The list of what is allowed includes (1) articles about scammers; (2) articles by scammers, whatever that might mean; and (3) it even includes articles that look like unrealistic puff-pieces, where someone has written an article about themselves, where they assert they are the greatest rapper in the history of rapping, in Bangladesh. Please review Wikialpha:CSD. If an article triggers your concern, AND it meets one of those criteria, place a tag on it. If an article triggers your concern, but it does not meet one of those criteria, your choices include: (1) POLITELY raising your concern, on the article's talk page, or the main contributor's user talk page; or (2) shrugging your shoulders and walking away. It doesn't matter if material you see here triggers you to hate the author, or the subject of an article, you must be polite. If the administrator who reviews your deletion tag does not agree with your concern, you can, POLITELY, explain your concern to them again, in more detail. But understand that what is allowed here is very broad. Note: If you were blocked for vandalism:
Ping the administrator who blocked you by leaving a note to them, on your |
WritingSnowman (talk) 16:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
this looks like vandalism. You have been blocked. Geo Swan (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)