User talk:IvankaTSQ1

From WikiAlpha
Jump to: navigation, search

this looks like vandalism

this looks like vandalism Geo Swan (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Warning

You are receiving this warning because:

  1. you blanked an article you didn't write;
  2. or you removed a large block of material from an article you didn't write;
  3. or you hijacked an existing article, turning it into an article about something else;
  4. or you rewrote key passage(s) of an existing article to attack someone;
  5. or you moved an article you didn't write to a nonsense name, or into the Deleted: namespace.

The list of what is ALLOWED here is broad. Wikialpha:CSD lists the kind of material that is subject to deletion.

The list of what is allowed includes (1) articles about scammers; (2) articles by scammers, whatever that might mean; and (3) it even includes articles that look like unrealistic puff-pieces, where someone has written an article about themselves, where they assert they are the greatest rapper in the history of rapping, in Bangladesh.

Please review Wikialpha:CSD. If an article triggers your concern, AND it meets one of those criteria, place a tag on it.

If an article triggers your concern, but it does not meet one of those criteria, your choices include: (1) POLITELY raising your concern, on the article's talk page, or the main contributor's user talk page; or (2) shrugging your shoulders and walking away.

It doesn't matter if material you see here triggers you to hate the author, or the subject of an article, you must be polite.

If the administrator who reviews your deletion tag does not agree with your concern, you can, POLITELY, explain your concern to them again, in more detail. But understand that what is allowed here is very broad.

Note: If you were blocked for vandalism:

  1. and can explain that what you did wasn't vandalism, you can get your block rolled back.
  2. if you can explain that you didn't know any better, and you can make a convincing case that you won't do it again, an administrator may agree to reduce the period of your block.

Ping the administrator who blocked you by leaving a note to them, on your User talk: page, that includes a wikilink to their User: page. [[User:Geo Swan]], for example. When you are blocked you can still write to your User talk: page.

User:Geo Swan Noted, but all articles we have posted have either authorisation from the original creator or it is article that has been prepared with the highest standards and independently verified

The QBF & NOA Circle Scam covered by the press

I removed this section because it looked like a copyright violation... Geo Swan (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Geo Swan Noted, but in any case, we have authorisation to re-publish the posts.


User:Geo Swan We are only seeking justice, and instead, these people stole our money and spent it on cars and other personal luxury items and engaged expensive lawyers to delay the process and to defame or cause serious issues to all whistleblowers. The first one to expose them, Mrs Linda Athanasiadou, accused him of heinous crimes with her daughter. After she ruined his life, the police found out it was all lies. 
User:Geo Swan She keeps making all sorts of false allegations without any evidence or substance; anyone who tries to expose them has the same fate. 
 User:Geo Swan All claims I made above are backed up by court and police evidence; not all can be disclosed yet due to the ongoing police investigations, but feel free to have a look at the following:
User:Geo Swan https://www.qbfexposed.com 
User:Geo Swan https://www.qbfexposed.com/qbf-noa-circle-scam-coverage-in-news
User:Geo Swan https://www.qbfexposed.com/court-cases-qbf-scam
  • I don't think pages should look like "attack pages".
  • Do you think you can write about these individuals in a fair and neutral manner? I'll remove your block. I am sorry I didn't see your notes here earlier.
  • Here is my suggestion.
  1. I'll remove your block.
  2. You work on drafts, in userspace, that are protected with a __NOINDEX__
  3. When you think they are ready, email me, and I will confirm they are not attack pages
  4. I'll then remove the __NOINDEX__ and move them to article space. Or, I will give you advice on how to make them neutral.
  • qbfexposed.com? It is practically undreadable, because someone thought the big header was so important it obscures all the site's actual contents. Please use more reliable references than this site. Geo Swan (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)