User:Web/AdminWatch
From WikiAlpha
The below content is licensed according to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License contrary to the public domain logo at the foot of the page. It originally appeared on http://en.wikipedia.org. The original article might still be accessible here. You may be able to find a list of the article's previous contributors on the talk page. |
Contents
AdminWatch
Rationale for this page
Admins, in general, are not accountable for their actions to non-admins. Admins are appointed for life, and are generally not disciplined with blocks and deletions in the same way non-admins are. For a non-admin to seek recourse for poor admin behaviour, they must first establish consensus. However, it is virtually impossible to establish this consensus without being accused of violating WP:AGF, WP:ATP, WP:CIVIL or WP:NPA.
I believe it is reasonable to subject admins to a higher level of scrutiny than non-admins. I think it helps the project to keep admins accountable for their actions. This page attempts to do that.
User:The ed17
- Deleted this page without warning or consensus [1]
User:Timotheus_Canens
- Open to recall
- WP:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Timeshift9 Closed in favour, erroneously claiming consensus
User:GorillaWarfare
User:Spartaz
- Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_June_5#User:Timeshift9 Closed in favour, still no consensus for delete