User talk:BDsurvey
Database error
Database error A database query error has occurred. This may indicate a bug in the software.
Whats the problem ?
warning
This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
- This was vandalism
In this edit, you replaced an article written by someone else with "This content is deleted under Spam/Advertising law." In this particular case I see no justification for calling the page SPAM.
If a wikialpha contributor genuinely thinks an article is not compliant with Wikialpha:CSD they are supposed to tag it, not blank it.
If they have a concern, that is not one of the criteria in CSD, they are supposed to POLITELY raise that concern on the article's talk page.
I blocked you for a week, prior to leaving you this note. Now that I see you engaged in vandalism more than I first realized I am lengthening that block. You can leave a note, here, explaining you understand what you did wrong. If it is convincing I may reduce the length of your block. Geo Swan (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Actually Sorry for those edits. It won't happen again. They are copying others so that I have edited those profiles.Can you please unblock me for the last time? Geo Swan
- In this edit you removed the last paragraph of my warning. In particular, you removed the portion where I said I would re-instate you if you left a note "explaining you understand what you did wrong."
- You did not explain that you understood what you did wrong. Try again please.
-
[Geo Swan]won't ping me.[[Geo Swan]]won't ping me.
-
- Use
[[User:Geo Swan]]to ping me.
- Use
- Most of us learned, in Kindergarten or Nursery School, "two wrongs don't make a right". Even if other contributors offend you, and you think they broke the rules, you are not authorized to resort to vandalism. Not even if you think they started it, and you think they resorted to vandalism first. Geo Swan (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- User:Geo Swan , I understood that, I vandalized many articles. And yes, I did horribly wrong. I am seeking apology to you, Please unblock me. It won't happen ever.
- You are not actually very experienced at using a wiki, are you?
- Okay, I encourage you to learn more about wiki editing.
- In particular, in return for unblocking you, I am going to insist that you use a meaningful edit summary for every edit. You were not the only recent vandal. And, like most recent contributors, you do not seem to understand the utility of using meaningful edit summaries.
- If the good faith contributors had been using edit summaries it would have taken far less of my time to try to undo the vandalism I saw.
- As I got to be more experienced at using edit summaries I decided to re-use the same bunch of common edit summaries. I use:
-
more detailswhen I add new material. -
ce- cleanup edit -
add reference -
revert vandalism- please don't let me see you using this one unless you are sure I will agree it was vandalism, not a good faith disagreement -
complicated - see talk -
As a courtesy to other contributors, could we discuss complicated or controversial issues on the talk page, not in our edit summaries...- this one breaks the pattern, by not being brief. To a reasonable person it is a perfectly reasonable request. However, I usually aim this edit summary at hot-heads, and it drives them nuts. Geo Swan (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2022 (UTC)- User:Geo Swan , Thanks a lot, I'll keep in mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BDsurvey (talk • contribs) 2022-10-17T13:23:22
a request
Please use edit summaries Geo Swan (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you. |
