United States Army Field Manual on interrogation
The United States Army Field Manual on interrogation instructs military interrogators how to conduct effective interrogations while conforming with U.S. and international law. The Field Manual was sometimes known by the code FM 34-52. The most recent revision was renamed Field Manual FM 2-22.3, "Human Intelligence Collector Operations.
Contents
Interrogations during the "global war on terror"
During the American war on terror the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld issued "extended interrogation techniques", that went farther than those authorized in the Army field manual. The extended techniques stimulated debate, both within the Bush administration, and outside it. And various revisions of the extended techniques were issued.
Rumsfeld intended the extended techniques to be used only on the captives the United States classified as "illegal combatants". But extended interrogation techniques were adopted in Iraq, even though captives there were entitled to protection under the Geneva Conventions. General Geoffrey Miller, who was then the director of interrogation of detainees held in Guantanamo Bay, and some of his staff were sent to Iraq to help transfer their interrogation experience. Military Intelligence troops who had been using extended techniques in Afghanistan, notably Captain Carolyn Wood.
General Ricardo Sanchez, the CO of American forces in Iraq, after input from Miller and his team, and from Captain Wood, issued his own set of extended techniques.
On April 28, 2005 Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual. The revised manual would have spelled out more clearly which interrogation techniques were prohibited.
On July 25, 2005 Senator John McCain tabled an amendment to the a military spending bill, intended to restrict all US government interrogators from using interrogation techniques not authorized in the Army field manual.
On October 20, 2005 Vice President Dick Cheney met with McCain to try to convince him to agree that his amendment should only apply to military interrogators. Cheney wanted to continue to allow civilian interrogators, working for US intelligence agencies, to use more extended interrogation techniques. McCain did not agree.
Plans to revise the manual to allow extended techniques
On April 28, 2005 Rumsfeld announced that the Army would be revising the manual. The revised manual would have spelled out more clearly which interrogation techniques were prohibited.
On December 14, 2005, the New York Times reported that the Army Field Manual had been rewritten by the Pentagon. Previously, the manual's interrogation techniques section could be read freely on the internet. But the new edition's includes 10 classified pages in the interrogation technique section, leaving the public clueless about what the government considers not to be torture. [1]
On June 5 2006 the Los Angeles Times reported that the Pentagon's revisions will remove the proscription against "humiliating and degrading treatment", and other proscriptions from article 3 of the third Geneva Convention.[2] [3] The LA Times reports that the State Department has argued against the revisions because of the effect it will have on the world's opinion of the United States.
Classified addendum
According to the New York Times, unlike previous versions, a draft of the new version of the manual from late 2005 contained a ten page classified addendum.[4] The Jurist reported on a draft with classified sections on May 5, 2006.[5]
September 6 2006 release
The new version was released on September 6, 2006.[6][7][8]
- The Jurist reported that the final version of the manual contained no classified sections.[8]
- The Jurist reported that the final version of the manual explicitly reference common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.[8]
- The Jurist reported that the manual applied to all captives of the US military custody, and to all captives of the CIA, in military custody, but it would not apply to captives of the CIA in CIA custody.[8]
According to The Jurist[8]:
- After the US Supreme Court's June ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, however, the Pentagon said that the Geneva Conventions would be applied to all detainees held in US military custody around the world, reversing the Defense Department's policy of classifying detainees as "enemy combatants" outside the protections of Article 3.
See also
Online versions
- .html version of FM 34-52, circa May 8, 1987
- .pdf version of FM 34-52, circa September 28, 1992
- .pdf version of Field Manual FM 2-22.3, "Human Intelligence Collector Operations.", circa September 6, 2006 (supercedes Field Manual 34-52.)
References
- ↑ New Army Rules May Snarl Talks With McCain on Detainee Issue, New York Times, December 14 2005 - mirror
- ↑ Geneva references omitted from revised Army interrogation manual, The Jurist, June 5 2006
- ↑ Army Manual to Skip Geneva Detainee Rule, Los Angeles Times, June 5 2006
- ↑ Eric Schmitt (December 14, 2005). "New Army Rules May Snarl Talks With McCain on Detainee Issue". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/14/politics/14detain.html?_r=1&oref=slogin. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ↑ Jamie Sterling (Wednesday, May 03, 2006). "Revised Army interrogation manual held up by secrecy concerns". The Jurist. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/05/revised-army-interrogation-manual-held.php. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ↑ "DoD News Briefing with Deputy Assistant Secretary Stimson and Lt. Gen. Kimmons from the Pentagon". Global Security. September 6, 2006. http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/news/2006/09/sec-060906-dod02.htm. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ↑ "Army Publishes New Intelligence Manual". Global Security. September 6, 2006. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2006/09/mil-060906-army01.htm. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Jeannie Shawl (Wednesday, September 06, 2006). "New US Army interrogation manual mandates Geneva rules". The Jurist. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/09/new-us-army-interrogation-manual.php. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
