John A. Rizzo

From WikiAlpha
Jump to: navigation, search
The below content is licensed according to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License contrary to the public domain logo at the foot of the page. It originally appeared on http://en.wikipedia.org. The original article might still be accessible here. You may be able to find a list of the article's previous contributors on the talk page.

John A. Rizzo
Born 1948 (age 75–76)
Boston, Massachusetts
Nationality USA
Education Brown University (B.A.)
George Washington University Law School (J.D.)
Occupation Lawyer
Known for Former Acting General Counsel of the CIA

John A. Rizzo (born 1948) was a lawyer at the Central Intelligence Agency for 34 years. He was the Deputy Counsel or Acting General Counsel of the CIA for the first nine years of the War on Terror, during which the CIA held dozens of detainees in black site prisons around the globe.[1] "Enhanced interrogation techniques" were approved by the George W. Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice in memos to Rizzo for use by CIA interrogators at the black sites.[2] Rizzo signed off on all CIA-directed drone strikes from September 2001 until October 2009.[3]

He is a Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution and Senior Counsel at the Steptoe & Johnson law firm.[4]

Early life and education

A Boston native, Rizzo attended college at Brown University.[5] He earned a law degree from George Washington University Law School.[6]

CIA career

Rizzo was hired at the CIA in 1976, just after the Church Committee released its report on the assassination of foreign leaders. By 1979, Rizzo became the staff lawyer for the Directorate of Operations, the CIA's clandestine branch.[5] He served as the liaison between the CIA and the congressional investigators studying the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s.[7] Rizzo became Acting General Counsel of the CIA in November 2001, a position that was traditionally filled by someone from outside the agency.[8]

Rizzo was the Acting General Counsel of the CIA from late 2001 to late 2002 and from mid-2004 until late 2009. He was Deputy General Counsel in the interim period from 2002 to 2004, while Scott Muller was General Counsel.[1]

The Bush administration nominated Rizzo as General Counsel of the CIA in mid-2007, but Democratic Senator Ron Wyden (OR) blocked his confirmation by the Senate Intelligence Committee. Wyden opposed Rizzo due to his involvement in approving the CIA's interrogation practices during the war on terror, which included torture.[9][10] The Bush administration withdrew his nomination, but kept Rizzo as Acting General Counsel until his retirement in October 2009.[11]

Sabrina De Sousa claims Rizzo was one of the CIA officials that approved the extraordinary rendition of Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, also known as Abu Omar, from Milan, Italy to a prison in Egypt. Nasr was held for four years and says he was tortured.[12]

Rizzo received the Thomas C. Clark Award from the Federal Bar Association and the Distinguished Career Intelligence Medal, the highest recognition awarded to a career CIA officer.[13]

Enhanced interrogation techniques

Abu Zubaydah, then considered a high-value detainee, was captured in Pakistan on March 28, 2002 and taken to a CIA black site prison in Thailand.[14] Originally interrogated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation using their traditional confidence-building techniques, Abu Zubaydah provided them with most of the valuable names and information that he ever gave up. But, because the CIA overrated Zubaydah's status and believed he was withholding information, and they were trying to prevent another major attack on the US, the CIA personnel and contractors at the black site wanted to use more coercive techniques to gain more information. One FBI agent called this treatment "borderline torture." FBI agents were pulled from the interrogations in early June.[14]

The Joint Personnel Recovery Agency, which ran the U.S. military's SERE program to train U.S. personnel to resist harsh interrogation methods, issued a memo with an attachment written to the General Counsel of the Department of Defense in July 2002.[15] The memo, which was passed on from the Pentagon to Rizzo, referred to the use of extreme duress on detainees as "torture" and warned that it would produce "unreliable information."[16]

Rizzo sent a request to the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel for an opinion as to whether certain interrogation techniques would violate the prohibition against torture. The OLC issued a memo signed by Jay S. Bybee to Rizzo on August 1, 2002; this was the first of what became known as the Torture Memos, in which Justice authorized specific techniques to be used in interrogations.[17] It approved 10 techniques, including waterboarding.[14]Rizzo concurred on the legality of these techniques and saw to it that said techniques were implemented in the department.[18]

Rizzo traveled with David Addington, the Vice President's chief of staff; William Haynes, General Counsel of the Department of Defense; and Michael Chertoff, then the head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, to consult with officers at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in late September 2002. One week later, a CIA lawyer told personnel with the military intelligence interrogation team at Guantanamo that, "if the detainee dies, you're doing it wrong."[19]

In 2005, CIA lawyers reviewed copies of videotapes made during interrogation of detainees and expressed their concerns to Rizzo. He requested the OLC to issue new statements about the legality of the enhanced interrogation techniques. The Los Angeles Times reported that Rizzo was becoming "increasingly anxious in the years after the Sept. 11 attacks that agency employees were being pressured to use methods that might later place them in legal jeopardy."[20] The OLC issued three memos,[21] [22] [23] signed by Steven G. Bradbury, then head of OLC, in May 2005 that stated the techniques did not violate the Convention Against Torture, as ratified by the United States in 1994.[24] Later in 2005, Rizzo traveled with other CIA officials, including Kyle Foggo, to several black sites, to assure CIA employees that their interrogation activities were legal.[25] The CIA destroyed most of the detainee interrogation videotapes in 2005.

Based on advice from Rizzo, then CIA Director Porter Goss halted the CIA interrogation program conducted at black sites in late 2005.[5] The United States Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006) that the military commissions and Combatant Status Review Panels were unconstitutional because they were not authorized by Congress and also that they deprived detainees of due process and protections under other laws. After that decision, Rizzo told his colleagues that the program was becoming increasingly difficult to maintain.[26] With the likely passage of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which authorized the administration's plan for a military court at Guantanamo outside the existing federal and military justice systems, the CIA transferred the fourteen high-value detainees to military custody at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

By the 2008 presidential election, considerable material had been revealed by the press, civil law suits brought by civil liberties organizations and a Congressional investigation about the interrogation practices of the Bush administration. During the campaign, Barack Obama had vowed to change the government's approach, namely to prohibit torture, end the practice of extraordinary rendition and end the use of black sites. On January 21, 2009, one day before Barack Obama was scheduled to sign Executive Order 13491 prohibiting enhanced interrogation techniques and banning the use of CIA black sites, Rizzo contacted the White House counsel, Gregory Craig. Rizzo told Craig that the current language would not allow the CIA to hold people for a day or two in transit during ordinary rendition. The language was changed so that CIA had authority to hold people "on a short-term, transitory basis."[27]

Videotapes of early interrogation sessions at Black Site

In early 2005, White House Counsel Harriet Miers told Rizzo not to destroy the tapes without checking with the White House first.[28] Jose A. Rodriguez Jr., the chief lawyer of the Directorate of Operations, sent a cable to the CIA's Bangkok station ordering the destruction of the tapes on November 8, 2005.[28][29] Rodriguez informed Goss and Rizzo of the destruction on November 10.[28]

Targeting of drone strikes

Rizzo signed off on all CIA directed drone strikes from the start of the program soon after September 11, 2001 until his retirement in October 2009.[3] He claims to have seen one "request for approval for targeting for lethal operation" per month and that roughly 30 individuals were targeted at any given time.[6]

In July 2011, the human rights group Reprieve and Pakistani lawyers called for the prosecution of Rizzo in Pakistan for murder for approving drone attacks that killed hundreds of people.[30][31][32][33] A Pakistani court ruled in May 2013 that American drone strikes in Pakistan are illegal and should be stopped by the government, using force if needed.[34]

In November 2011, the National Journal cited unnamed sources in reporting that the Department of Justice had opened an investigation of Rizzo for improperly disclosing classified information about the CIA drone program.[35] The probe was first opened by Rizzo's former office, the General Counsel of the CIA, in March 2011 after a detailed interview Rizzo gave Newsweek.[6] The General Counsel's office forwarded evidence it collected to the DOJ that spring.[35]

Works

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mazzetti, Mark (June 20, 2007). "Nominee for C.I.A. Counsel Offers Few Details in His Senate Confirmation Hearing". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/washington/20intel.html. Retrieved October 6, 2011. 
  2. Talev, Margaret; Taylor, Marisa (April 16, 2009). "Bush-era interrogations: From waterboarding to forced nudity". McClatchy. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/04/16/66339/bush-era-interrogations-from-waterboarding.html. Retrieved October 6, 2011. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Priest, Dana; Arkin, William M. (September 6, 2011). "Inside the CIA’s "Kill List"". Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State. ISBN 978-0-316-18221-8. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-war-on-terror/topsecretamerica/inside-the-cias-kill-list/. Retrieved October 6, 2011. 
  4. Rizzo, John A. (March 30, 2012). "The CIA-Congress War". Defining Ideas. http://www.hoover.org/publications/defining-ideas/article/112491. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Miller, Greg (June 29, 2009). "John Rizzo: The most influential career lawyer in CIA history". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/29/nation/na-cia-lawyer29. Retrieved October 12, 2011. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Mckelvey, Tara (February 13, 2011). "Inside the Killing Machine". Newsweek. http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/02/13/inside-the-killing-machine.html. Retrieved October 6, 2011. 
  7. DeYoung, Karen (June 20, 2007). "Senators Question CIA Nominee on Torture". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/19/AR2007061902331.html. Retrieved October 12, 2011. 
  8. Priest, Dana (December 30, 2005). "Covert CIA Program Withstands New Furor". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/29/AR2005122901585.html. Retrieved October 13, 2011. 
  9. Warrick, Joby (September 13, 2007). "Senate Intelligence Panel Seeks CIA Nominee's Withdrawal". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/12/AR2007091202353.html. Retrieved October 12, 2011. 
  10. Hentoff, Nat (August 21, 2007). "History Will Not Absolve Us". Village Voice. http://www.villagevoice.com/2007-08-21/news/history-will-not-absolve-us/. Retrieved October 13, 2011. 
  11. Mazzetti, Mark (September 26, 2007). "Nominee for C.I.A. Counsel Withdraws". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/26/washington/26rizzo.html. Retrieved October 13, 2011. 
  12. Landay, Jonathan S. (July 27, 2013). "U.S. allowed Italian kidnap prosecution to shield higher-ups, ex-CIA officer says". McClatchy Washington Bureau. 
  13. "Watching 'Zero Dark Thirty' with the CIA: Separating fact from fiction". American Enterprise Institute. January 29, 2013. http://www.aei.org/events/2013/01/29/watching-zero-dark-thirty-with-the-cia-separating-fact-from-fiction/. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Warrick, Joby; Finn, Peter (April 22, 2009). "Harsh Tactics Readied Before Their Approval". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/21/AR2009042104055.html. Retrieved October 19, 2011. 
  15. "OPERATIONAL ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE USE OF PHYSICAL/PSYCHOLIGCAL (sic) COERCION IN INTERROGATION". JPRA. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf/JPRA-Memo_042409.pdf. Retrieved October 24, 2011. 
  16. Finn, Peter; Warrick, Joby (April 25, 2009). "In 2002, Military Agency Warned Against 'Torture'; Extreme Duress Could Yield Unreliable Information, It Said". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/24/AR2009042403171.html. Retrieved October 24, 2011. 
  17. Bybee, Jay S. (August 1, 2002). "Memorandum for John Rizzo". ACLU. http://media.luxmedia.com/aclu/olc_08012002_bybee.pdf. Retrieved October 19, 2011. 
  18. http://www.npr.org/2014/01/07/260155065/cia-lawyer-waterboarding-wasnt-torture-then-and-isnt-torture-now
  19. Strobel, Warren P. (June 17, 2008). "CIA advised military on questioning at Guantanamo". McClatchy. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2008/06/17/41329/cia-advised-military-on-questioning.html. Retrieved October 6, 2011. 
  20. Miller, Greg; Meyer, Josh (April 17, 2009). "Obama assures intelligence officials they won't be prosecuted over interrogations". Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/apr/17/nation/na-interrogation17. Retrieved October 19, 2011. 
  21. Bradbury, Steven G. (May 10, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo". ACLU. http://media.luxmedia.com/aclu/olc_05102005_bradbury46pg.pdf. Retrieved October 24, 2011. 
  22. Bradbury, Steven G. (May 10, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo". ACLU. http://media.luxmedia.com/aclu/olc_05102005_bradbury_20pg.pdf. Retrieved October 24, 2011. 
  23. Bradbury, Steven G. (May 30, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo". ACLU. http://media.luxmedia.com/aclu/olc_05302005_bradbury.pdf. Retrieved October 24, 2011. 
  24. Smith, R. Jeffrey (May 10, 2009). "Hill Panel Reviewing CIA Tactics". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/09/AR2009050902489.html. Retrieved October 19, 2011. 
  25. Johnston, David; Mazzetti, Mark (August 12, 2009). "A Window Into C.I.A.’s Embrace of Secret Jails". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/world/13foggo.html. Retrieved October 19, 2011. 
  26. Linzer, Dafna; Kessler, Glenn (September 8, 2006). "Decision to Move Detainees Resolved Two-Year Debate Among Bush Advisers". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/07/AR2006090701582.html. Retrieved October 13, 2011. 
  27. Becker, Jo; Shane, Scott (May 29, 2012). "Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=2. Retrieved January 4, 2013. 
  28. 28.0 28.1 28.2 Apuzzo, Matt; Goldman, Adam (July 25, 2010). "Key omission in memo to destroy CIA terror tapes". Seattle Times. AP. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2012449399_apusciatapes.html. Retrieved October 14, 2011. 
  29. Mazzetti, Mark; Shane, Scott (February 20, 2008). "Tape Inquiry: Ex-Spymaster in the Middle". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/washington/20intel.html. Retrieved October 13, 2011. 
  30. Beaumont, Peter (July 16, 2011). "Campaigners seek arrest of former CIA legal chief over Pakistan drone attacks". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/15/cia-usa. Retrieved October 25, 2011. 
  31. "Pakistani Drone Victims and Families Seek Arrest Warrant for Former CIA Counsel John Rizzo". Center for Constitution Rights. July 19, 2011. http://ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/pakistani-drone-victims-and-families-seek-arrest-warrant-former-cia-counsel-john-rizzo. Retrieved October 25, 2011. 
  32. Hussain, Murtaza (December 15, 2011). [http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/12/20111213112743546541.html "Pakistan's legal fight to end the 007d19 drone war"]. Al Jazeera. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/12/20111213112743546541.html. Retrieved December 16, 2011. 
  33. Rose, David (October 20, 2012). "CIA chiefs face arrest over horrific evidence of bloody 'video-game' sorties by drone pilots". Mail on Sunday (UK). http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220828/US-drone-attacks-CIA-chiefs-face-arrest-horrific-evidence-bloody-video-game-sorties.html. Retrieved July 10, 2013. 
  34. Ross, Alice K (9 May 2013). "Pakistani court rules CIA drone strikes are illegal". Bureau of Investigative Journalism. http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2013/05/09/pakistani-court-rules-cia-drone-strikes-are-illegal-and-war-crimes/. Retrieved 10 July 2013. 
  35. 35.0 35.1 Ambinder, Marc; Dreazen, Yochi J (November 10, 2011). "Former Top CIA Lawyer Under Investigation". National Journal. http://www.nationaljournal.com/former-top-cia-lawyer-under-investigation-20111110. Retrieved November 28, 2011. 

External links