Deleted:Hozaifa Parhat

From WikiAlpha
Jump to: navigation, search
Hozaifa Parhat
Born

}}}}}}}} 11,

}} 1971
Ghulja, China
Other names Ablikim Turahun

Hozaifa Parhat is an Uyghur refugee, who was held in extrajudicial detention for seven years in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.[1] Parhat was the first and only captive to have his DTA appeal run to completion.[2][3] On June 20, 2008, a three judge panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals compared the arguments used by the Department of Defense to a passage from Lewis Carroll's surrealist poem, "The Hunting of the Snark". He was transferred to Bermuda in 2009, with three other former Uyghur captives in Guantanamo.[4]

Background

Joint Task Force Guantanamo reported he was born on February 11, 1971, in Ghulja, China.[1] Parhat is one of the 22 Uighurs held in Guantanamo.[5][6][7]

Uyghurs were the main ethnic group in what China now calls Xingiang Province, but which the Uyghurs call East Turkestan.[8] Prior to 9-11 Parhat had been living in a camp in the mountains in Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan, with other Uyghur refugees, where they said they were constructing a refugee camp. Their refugee camp was one of the targets bombed when American forces overthrew the Taliban in the fall of 2001. Parhat and his colleagues describe fleeing the American aerial bombardment, getting lost in the mountains, but eventually making their way across the border to Pakistan. Pakistani villagers who initially fed them, gave them a place to sleep, and who initially seemed friendly and welcoming had actually turned them over to Pakistani security forces.

Formerly secret reports confirm that American intelligence officials had concluded Parhat was neither a member of al Qaeda or the Taliban in 2003.[4]

Parhat v. Gates

40x40px Wikisource has original text related to this article:

He is the lead petitioner in Parhat v. Gates, no. 06-1397 (D.C. Cir.), a case brought by seven Uyghurs challenging their "enemy combatant" designation under the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005.[9]

Susan Baker Manning, one of Parhat's attorneys, commented:

If we're going to hold people, possibly for the rest of their lives, it seems eminently fair that we should look at all the evidence to see if they are or are not the people who should be at Guantánamo.[10]

Official status reviews

Originally the Bush Presidency asserted that captives apprehended in the "war on terror" were not covered by the Geneva Conventions, and could be held indefinitely, without charge, and without an open and transparent review of the justifications for their detention.[11] In 2004 the United States Supreme Court ruled, in Rasul v. Bush, that Guantanamo captives were entitled to being informed of the allegations justifying their detention, and were entitled to try to refute them.

Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants

Following the Supreme Court's ruling the Department of Defense set up the Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants.[11] A two page Summary of Evidence memo was prepared for his 2004 Combatant Status Review Tribunal, and a 24 page transcript was published on March 3, 2006.[12][13]

Scholars at the Brookings Institute, lead by Benjamin Wittes, listed the captives still held in Guantanamo in December 2008, according to whether their detention was justified by certain common allegations[14]:

  • Hozaifa Parhat was listed as one of the captives who the Wittes team was unable to identify as presently cleared for release or transfer.[14]
  • Hozaifa Parhat was listed as one of the captives who "The military alleges ... are associated with both Al Qaeda and the Taliban."[14]
  • Hozaifa Parhat was listed as one of the captives who "The military alleges ... took military or terrorist training in Afghanistan."[14]
  • Hozaifa Parhat was listed as one of the captives who "The military alleges ... were at Tora Bora."[14]
  • Hozaifa Parhat was listed as one of the captives who was a foreign fighter.[14]
  • Hozaifa Parhat was listed as one of the remaining 17 Uyghur captives who had been cleared for release.[14]

Habeas corpus review

US District Court Judge Richardo M. Urbina heard his habeas corpus petition 05-cv-1509.[15] It was initiated in 2005, and Urbina ruled he should be released on October 7, 2008.

DTA appeal

Starting in 2002 some Guantanamo captives had lawyers volunteer to assist them in filing habeas corpus petitions.[16] In 2004, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Rasul v. Bush that captives were entitled to have a writ of habeas corpus submitted on their behalf.

In 2005 Senator John McCain, who had himself been tortured when he was taken captive when his plane was shot down during the War in Vietnam, sponsored the Detainee Treatment Act. The Act prohibit US employees from certain kinds of torture and abuse of captives -- anything that would be considered "cruel and unusual" if it happened in a civilian prison.[16] But the Act also had provisions to stop captives from initiating new habeas corpus petitions through the US civilian court system. The Act replaced habeas corpus with a more limited review, that came to be called DTA appeal.

The DTA appeals could only be performed by panels composed of judges from the DC Circuit Court of Appeal, who were only authorized to review the conclusions reached in captives' Combatant Status Review Tribunals.[16] Many captives' habeas attorneys initiated DTA appeals. The DC Circuit Court of Appeals had decided they would allow just two of the captives' DTA appeals, to move forward, to sort out the problems encountered with those two, before reviewing any of the others. The two they proceeded with were Hozaifa v. Gates and Bismullah v. Rumsfeld.

The Department of Justice and the Department of Defense did not immediately agree to hand over to the Court of Appeals the evidence necessary to review these two men's CSR Tribunal decisions.[16]

It wasn't until October 2007 that Parhat's attorneys were provided with copies of the classified evidence submitted to the CSR Tribunal that confirmed earlier determinations that he was an "enemy combatant".

Three judges of the Circuit Court ruled on the validity of the determination Parhat's CSR Tribunal had made that he was an "enemy combatant" on June 20, 2008.[17][2][3]

Parhat's attorneys had argued that the definition of "enemy combatant" used by the Department of Defense went beyond what had been authorized by the United States Congress when it passed its Authorization to Use Military Force in the weeks after al Qaeda's attacks on the US mainland on September 11, 2001.[16] However, the Court of Appeals had not found it necessary to address that issue as they ruled that Parhat did not meet the definition of "enemy combatant" as used within the CSR Tribunal process. Parhat had known or associated with members of the East Turkestan Independence Movement, but was not himself a member of that group. Members of the leadership of the East Turkestan Independence Movement were said to have met Osama bin Laden, but no sourced evidence had been submitted that Al Qaeda and the East Turkestan Independence Movement were allied. Therefore they ruled Parhat did not fall under the clause of the definition that included "associated forces". Parhat

Formerly secret Joint Task Force Guantanamo assessment

On April 25, 2011, whistleblower organization WikiLeaks published formerly secret assessments drafted by Joint Task Force Guantanamo analysts.[18][19] Parhat's assessment was two pages long, and was drafted on February 21, 2004.[20] It was signed by camp commandant Geoffrey Miller, and recommended that his "transfer to the control of another country for continued detention."[21]

Federal appeal

40x40px Wikisource has original text related to this article:
40x40px Wikisource has original text related to this article:

On June 12, 2008, the United States Supreme Court ruled on Boumediene v. Bush. Its ruling overturned aspects of the Detainee Treatment Act and Military Commissions Act of 2006, allowing Guantanamo captives to access the US justice system for habeas petitions.

On Monday June 23, 2008, it was announced that a three judge Federal court of appeal had overturned the determination of Parhat's Combatant Status Review Tribunal on Friday June 20, 2008.[22][23][24][25][26] Parhat's was the first case to ruled on since the Supreme Court's ruling in Boumediene v. Bush. The panel that reviewed Parhat's CSR Tribunal determination was made up of David B. Sentelle, Merrick B. Garland and Thomas B. Griffith.[27] The court initially published only a one paragraph announcement as its full ruling contained classified material. According to CNN the judges ordered the Department of Defense to either: "release or transfer Parhat, or to expeditiously hold a new [military] tribunal."[25]

According to Sabin Willett, one of his lawyers, it was not possible to tell Parhat of the ruling, because camp authorities were holding him in solitary confinement.[28]

The Los Angeles Times quoted comments on the ruling from David Cole, the author of two books on military law[28]:

Now all of these cases have been revived and this is the first case to move forward. And here is somebody that the military has been holding on to for six years and the federal court now says he shouldn't have been held in the first place. Absent this independent judicial review, he might have been sitting there for another 10 to 15 years. Now he has a chance to find freedom.

On June 19, 2008, Congressional Representatives Bill Delahunt and Dana Rohrabacher published an open letter to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, calling for the Uyghurs to be moved to more humane conditions within Guantanamo until a country can be found to accept them.[26]

The 39 paqe redacted, unclassified version of the ruling was published on June 30.[29] The ruling pointedly criticized the government's argument that evidence must be reliable because it appears in several documents, stating that “This comes perilously close to suggesting that whatever the government says must be treated as true.” It compared this argument to the Bellman's dictum in Lewis Carroll's The Hunting of the Snark: "Lewis Carroll notwithstanding, the fact that the government has 'said it thrice' does not make an allegation true."[30]

Steve Chapman a legal columnist at the Chicago Tribune commented on the Bush administration's arguments[31]:

The operating assumption here is that the prisoners are terrorists who were captured while fighting a vicious war against the United States. But can the critics be sure? All they really know about the Guantanamo detainees is that they are Guantanamo detainees. To conclude that they are all bloodthirsty jihadists requires believing that the U.S. government is infallible.

Petition for release into the USA

On July 23, 2008 Susan Baker Manning filed a motion requesting Parhat be released on parole in the USA, until his habeas petition was completed.[32][33]

On August 5, 2008 the United States Department of Justice opposed Parhat being released in the USA, and to having a judgment made on his habeas petition.[34] The Government's opposition filing was 22 pages long.

The Department of Justice had initially claimed it was necessary to convene a new Combatant Status Review Tribunal, which might consider new evidence supporting a determination that Parhat was indeed an "enemy combatant".[35] On September 2, 2008 the DC Circuit Court denied the Department of Justice plea, ensuring that there would be no re-hearing for Parhat.[36]

The Bush administration still maintains no foreign country is willing to accept Parhat, and is resisting calls to offer him residency or asylum in the USA.[37]

On September 29, 2008 James Oliphant, writing in the Chicago Tribune, quoted Jason Pinney, one of the Uyghur's attorneys.[38] Oliphant characterized the USA deciding to label the Separatist group the Uyghurs were said to have been affiliated with a terrorist group, long after they were captured, in order to curry support from the Chinese for the invasion of Iraq:

  • "The Uighurs are really the poster boys for what happens when you exclude judicial review from something like Guantanamo. You get abuse."
  • "If you connect the dots, it does not look good. The government knew it did something wrong, picked up the wrong people."
  • "They want to blame the international community. They won't accept these poor Uighurs. You've brought them here and you have labeled them terrorists. The worst of the worst. Cold-blooded killers."

Oliphant also quoted Commander Jeffrey Gordon, a Guantanamo spokesman, who defended the record of GI's at Guantanamo[38]:

  • "This assertion is categorically untrue. For years, we have been hard at work with the international community in resettlement options for the Uighurs at Guantanamo, as we do not repatriate detainees to countries which cannot provide credible assurances of humane treatment."

Sent to Bermuda

Huzaifa Parhat and three other Uyghurs Abdul Helil Mamut, Emam Abdulahat and Jalal Jalaladin were set free in Bermuda on June 11, 2009.[4]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 "List of Individuals Detained by the Department of Defense at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from January 2002 through May 15, 2006". United States Department of Defense. http://www.dod.mil/news/May2006/d20060515%20List.pdf. Retrieved 2006-05-15.  mirror
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Josh Meyer (2008-06-24). "Court rules in favor of detainee: The Guantanamo inmate is ordered to be freed, transferred or given a new hearing, in a new setback for the Bush administration". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2012-08-16. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Farticles.latimes.com%2F2008%2Fjun%2F24%2Fnation%2Fna-gitmo24&date=2012-08-16. Retrieved 2012-08-16. "A lawyer for Huzaifa Parhat, who has been kept virtually incommunicado for more than six years, said he and other members of Parhat's legal team would seek to have him freed immediately. Parhat is one of 17 Uighur Muslims, an ethnic minority in China, who are still being held at Guantanamo even though the U.S. government acknowledges they pose no threat." 
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Bill Mears (2008-06-30). "Court cites nonsense poem in ruling for Gitmo detainee". CNN. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2008%2FPOLITICS%2F06%2F30%2Fcourt.poem%2F&date=2012-08-22. Retrieved 2012-08-22. "The government suggests that several of the assertions in the intelligence documents are reliable because they are made in at least three different documents ... We are not persuaded. Lewis Carroll notwithstanding, the fact the government has 'said it thrice' does not make the allegation true. In fact we have no basis for concluding that there are independent sources for the documents' thrice-made assertions." 
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Andy Worthington (2009-06-11). "Who Are the Four Guantanamo Uighurs Sent to Bermuda?". Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-worthington/who-are-the-four-guantana_b_214606.html. Retrieved 2009-06-11. 
  5. ↑ Bill Delahunt, Sabin Willett (2009-04-02). "Innocent detainees need a home". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boston.com%2Fbostonglobe%2Feditorial_opinion%2Foped%2Farticles%2F2009%2F04%2F02%2Finnocent_detainees_need_a_home%2F+&date=2012-08-22. "Seventeen Uighurs are entering their eighth year of imprisonment at Guantanamo." 
  6. ↑ "17 Innocent Uighurs Detained at Guantánamo Ask Supreme Court for Release: Supreme Court Asked to Determine Whether an Illegally Imprisoned Detainee is Entitled to a Remedy". Center for Constitutional Rights. 2009-04-06. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fccrjustice.org%2Fnewsroom%2Fpress-releases%2F17-innocent-uighurs-detained-guant%25C3%25A1namo-ask-supreme-court-release&date=2012-08-22. 
  7. ↑ Adam Wolfe (2004-11-04). "China's Uighurs trapped at Guantanamo". Asia Times. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.atimes.com%2Fatimes%2FChina%2FFK04Ad02.html+&date=2012-08-22. "The Pentagon wants to release more than 12 of some two dozen Uighur detainees imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, but Washington for strategic and political reasons will not return the detainees, captured in Afghanistan, to China, which considers them terrorists and Xinjiang separatists. China would be expected to deal with them harshly." 
  8. ↑ Andy Worthington (2007). The Guantanamo Files. Pluto Press. ISBN 978 0 7453 2664 1. 
  9. ↑ Erika Tillery (December 18, 2006). "Hufaiza Parhat v. Robert M Gates" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. http://www.pegc.us/archive/Parhat_v_Gates/pet_mot_po_20061218.pdf. Retrieved 2008-04-08. 
  10. ↑ William Glaberson (September 12, 2007). "Officials Cite Danger in Revealing Detainee Data". New York Times. p. A18. Archived from the original on 2013-02-06. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/12/washington/12gitmo.html?ref=todayspaper. Retrieved 2007-09-12. 
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 "U.S. military reviews 'enemy combatant' use". USA Today. 2007-10-11. Archived from the original on 2012-08-11. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fnews%2Fwashington%2F2007-10-11-guantanamo-combatants_N.htm&date=2012-08-11. "Critics called it an overdue acknowledgment that the so-called Combatant Status Review Tribunals are unfairly geared toward labeling detainees the enemy, even when they pose little danger. Simply redoing the tribunals won't fix the problem, they said, because the system still allows coerced evidence and denies detainees legal representation." 
  12. ↑ Margot Williams (2008-11-03). "Guantanamo Docket: Ablikim Turahun". New York Times. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprojects.nytimes.com%2Fguantanamo%2Fdetainees%2F320-ablikim-turahun&date=2012-08-22. 
  13. ↑ "US releases Guantanamo files". Melbourne: The Age. April 4, 2006. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theage.com.au%2Fnews%2FWorld%2FUS-releases-Guantanamo-files%2F2006%2F04%2F04%2F1143916500334.html&date=2012-08-22. Retrieved 2008-03-15. "Transcripts of some hearings released on Monday did not state the name of the detainees involved, although the names and nationalities of many detainees were contained in other documents and those released last month." 
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 14.5 14.6 Benjamin Wittes, Zaathira Wyne (2008-12-16). "The Current Detainee Population of Guantánamo: An Empirical Study". The Brookings Institute. Archived from the original on 2012-06-22. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2008/12/16%20detainees%20wittes/1216_detainees_wittes.pdf. Retrieved 2010-02-16. "Al Sani said he traveled to Afghanistan shortly before September 11 and trained on a Kalashnikov. “I felt it was important in coming of age,” he said. “I went to Afghanistan for weapons training, not to fight anyone.”" 
  15. ↑ "Table of Guantanamo Habeas Cases in the U.S. District Court of D.C. - Grants & Denials: Habeas Granted to 38 of 59 detainees". Human Rights First. 2011-03-15. Archived from the original on 2013-02-06. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.humanrightsfirst.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fpdf%2Fhabeas-decisions-gitmo-detainees.pdf&date=2013-02-06. Retrieved 2012-08-23. 
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Jennifer K. Elsea, Michael John Garcia, and Kenneth Thomas (2008-09-10). "Enemy Combatant Detainees: Habeas Corpus Challenges in Federal Court". Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original on 2013-02-06. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcrs.wikileaks-press.org%2FRL33180.pdf&date=2013-02-06. Retrieved 2012-08-23.  16x16px Media related to File:Enemy Combatant Detainees- Habeas Corpus Challenges in Federal Court.pdf at Wikimedia Commons
  17. ↑ Peter Jan Honigsberg (2009-05-18). Our Nation Unhinged: The Human Consequences of the War on Terror. University of California Press. p. 174. ISBN 9780520254725. http://books.google.ca/books?id=nIywx8WSFRIC&pg=PA174&lpg=PA174&dq=Parhat+%22hunting+of+the+snark%22&source=bl&ots=BZDGclZadj&sig=_DaLxoIK80TW-Y77RjYAOlRinvo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=5Uc2UMqFPNStyAHznoDIAw&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Parhat%20%22hunting%20of%20the%20snark%22&f=false. Retrieved 2012-08-23. "In reviewing his case, the circuit court ruled that the evidence the government presented against Parhat in the CSRT hearing was insufficient to categorize himas an enemy combatant. The court stated that the government's assertion that Parhat was affiliated with an Uighur independence group associated with al Qaeda and the Taliban lacked sufficient foundation." 
  18. ↑ Christopher Hope, Robert Winnett, Holly Watt, Heidi Blake (2011-04-27). "WikiLeaks: Guantanamo Bay terrorist secrets revealed -- Guantanamo Bay has been used to incarcerate dozens of terrorists who have admitted plotting terrifying attacks against the West – while imprisoning more than 150 totally innocent people, top-secret files disclose". The Telegraph (UK). Archived from the original on 2012-07-13. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworldnews%2Fwikileaks%2F8471907%2FWikiLeaks-Guantanamo-Bay-terrorist-secrets-revealed.html&date=2012-07-13. Retrieved 2012-07-13. "The Daily Telegraph, along with other newspapers including The Washington Post, today exposes America’s own analysis of almost ten years of controversial interrogations on the world’s most dangerous terrorists. This newspaper has been shown thousands of pages of top-secret files obtained by the WikiLeaks website." 
  19. ↑ "WikiLeaks: The Guantánamo files database". The Telegraph (UK). 2011-04-27. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wikileaks-files/guantanamo-bay-wikileaks-files/8476672/WikiLeaks-The-Guantanamo-files-database.html. Retrieved 2012-07-10. 
  20. ↑ "Hozaifa Parhat: Guantanamo Bay detainee file on Hozaifa Parhat, US9CH-000320DP, passed to the Telegraph by Wikileaks". The Telegraph (UK). 2011-04-27. Archived from the original on 2012-08-22. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.telegraph.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fwikileaks-files%2Fguantanamo-bay-wikileaks-files%2F8477074%2FGuantanamo-Bay-detainee-file-on-Hozaifa-Parhat-US9CH-000320DP.html&date=2012-08-22. Retrieved 2012-08-22. "Recommendation: Transfer to the control of another country for continued detention" 
  21. ↑ Geoffrey D. Miller (2004-02-21). "Update Recommendation to a Transfer to the Control of Another Country for Continued Detention (TRCD) for Guantanamo Detainee, ISN: US9CH-000320DP (S)". Joint Task Force Guantanamo. http://wikileaks.ch/gitmo/pdf/ch/us9ch-000320dp.pdf. Retrieved 2012-08-22.  16x16px Media related to File:ISN 00320, Hozaifa Farhat's Guantanamo detainee assessment.pdf at Wikimedia Commons
  22. ↑ James Vicini (June 23, 2008). "Appeals court rules for Guantanamo prisoner". Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062300844.html. Retrieved 2008-06-23.  mirror
  23. ↑ "In first, court rejects military's ruling in Guantanamo case". McClatchy News Service. June 23, 2008. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/41907.html. Retrieved 2008-06-23. 
  24. ↑ "US appeals court rejects classification of Chinese Muslim as an enemy combatant". International Herald Tribune. June 23, 2008. http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/06/23/america/NA-GEN-US-Guantanamo-Chinese-Muslim.php. Retrieved 2008-06-23. 
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Bill Mears (June 23, 2008). "Court rules in favor of Chinese Muslim held at Gitmo". CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2008/US/06/23/gitmo.chinese.muslim/. Retrieved 2008-06-23. 
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 Pete Yost (2008-06-24). "Court ruling on detainee another setback for gov't". Boston Globe. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2008/06/23/appeals_court_rules_for_guantanamo_detainee/?rss_id=Boston.com+--+National+news. Retrieved 2008-06-24.  mirror
  27. ↑ William Glaberson (2008-06-24). "Court Voids Finding on Guantánamo Detainee". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/24/washington/24combatant.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin. Retrieved 2008-06-24. 
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Josh Meyer (2008-06-24). "Court rules for Guantanamo inmate". Los Angeles Times. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-gitmo24-2008jun24,0,6727416.story. Retrieved 2008-06-24. ""It is a tremendous day. It is a very conservative court, but we pressed ahead and we won unanimously," said lawyer P. Sabin Willett. "But Huzaifa Parhat is now in his seventh year of imprisonment at Guantanamo Bay, and he doesn't even know about this ruling because he's sitting in solitary confinement and we can't tell him about it. That's what we do to people in this country -- we put them in solitary confinement even when they are not enemy combatants.""  mirror
  29. ↑ "Full opinion" (pdf). http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200806/06-1397-1124487.pdf. Retrieved 2008-07-04. 
  30. ↑ Matt Apuzzo (30 June 2008). "Judges cite nonsense poem in Guantanamo case". Chicago Tribune. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/sns-ap-guantanamo-chinese-detainee,0,2303483.story. Retrieved 2008-07-04. 
  31. ↑ Steve Chapman (2008-07-06). "Truth and the Gitmo detainees". Chicago Tribune. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0706chapmanjul06,0,3566869.column. Retrieved 2008-07-30. "But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, after reviewing secret documents submitted by the government, found that there was no real evidence. It said the flimsy case mounted against Parhat "comes perilously close to suggesting that whatever the government says must be treated as true." And it ruled that, based on the information available, he was not an enemy combatant even under the Pentagon's own definition of the term."  mirror
  32. ↑ "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 191 -- Notice of filing" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. 2008-07-23. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008mc00442/131990/191/0.pdf. Retrieved 2008-08-13. 
  33. ↑ "Huzaifa Parhat's motion for immediate release on parole into the continental United States pending final judgment on his habeas petition" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. 2008-07-29. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008mc00442/131990/203/0.pdf. Retrieved 2008-08-13. 
  34. ↑ Gregory G. Katsas, John C. O'Quinn (2008-08-05). "Respondent's combined opposition to Parhat's motion for immediate release into the United States and to Parhat's motion for judgment on his habeas petition" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/district-of-columbia/dcdce/1:2008mc00442/131990/243/0.pdf. Retrieved 2008-08-13. 
  35. ↑ Lyle Denniston (2008-08-19). "Analysis: Escalating the Parhat case". Scotusblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/analysis-escalating-the-parhat-case/. Retrieved 2008-09-09.  mirror
  36. ↑ Lyle Denniston (2008-09-03). "No rehearing in Parhat". Scotusblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/no-rehearing-in-parhat/. Retrieved 2008-09-09.  mirror
  37. ↑ "A Home for a Detainee: The U.S. government wants to get Huzaifa Parhat out of Guantanamo Bay. Here's how it could". Washington Post. 2008-08-16. p. A14. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/15/AR2008081503322.html. Retrieved 2008-09-09. 
  38. ↑ 38.0 38.1 James Oliphant (2008-09-29). "A Chinese Muslim in Gitmo legal limbo: Though eligible for freedom, detainee labeled a foe of China is going nowhere". Chicago Tribune. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-gitmo-uighurssep29,0,3841799.story. Retrieved 2008-09-29.  mirror

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Huzaifa Parhat.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikialpha.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Deleted:Hozaifa_Parhat&oldid=57462"