Deleted:Guantanamo Bay detainees captured on the battlefield

From WikiAlpha
Jump to: navigation, search
The below content is licensed according to Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License contrary to the public domain logo at the foot of the page. It originally appeared on http://en.wikipedia.org. The original article might still be accessible here. You may be able to find a list of the article's previous contributors on the talk page.

Template:Confusing

The captives the United States holds in extrajudicial detention, in its Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba, have been described b the government as having been captured on the battlefield.[1][2][3][4][5]

Details about the circumstances of the captures

At first the Bush administration policy was to keep all the details of the circumstances of the capture, and the identities of most of the captives the United States had taken in it war on terror were considered national security secrets, and were kept classified.

But, in July 2004 the habeas corpus case Rasul v. Bush reached the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that the Executive Branch had to provide the captives with an opportunity to hear and contest the allegations against them. They specified that the opportunity should be modeled after the Tribunals the military usually uses to distinguish between captives who were civilian refugees, and "lawful combatants", and combatants who had breached the criteria in Article four of the Third Geneva Convention, thus stripping themselves from the protections of "Prisoner of War" status.

The Department of Defense complied with a Freedom of Information Act request, and released the Summary of Evidence memos that listed the allegations against the captives. The names and ID numbers were redacted from these memoranda. But a team of legal scholars at Seton Hall University's Center for Policy and Research conducted a statistical analysis of the allegations against the captives. As of March 2007 the legal team has published five papers based on their analysis. One of their most notable and controversial conclusions is that the portion of the allegations section set aside for "hostile activity" was blank for 55% of the captives.

On March 3, 2006 the Department of Defense complied with a court order, and was forced to release the transcripts of the unclassified sessions of the captives who had participated in their Tribunals.

Lists of captives captured on the battlefield

Captives who the DoD asserts were captured, by Americans, following a military skirmish
id name capture notes
Abdul Bagi February 10, 2003
Lejay, Afghanistan
  • JTF-GTMO analysts claim he was observed hiding in a hole, after throwing a weapon down a well.
  • Denies hiding, denies having a weapon.
  • Claims the well only had a foot of water in it, and that the water was crystal clear, so the absence of any weapons in it should have been obvious. Claims interrogators only confronted him with this accusation a week after his capture.
  • Claims he was an innocent local civilian, who emerged from the safety of his home, half an hour after the firing ceased, when he thought it would be safe.
Omar Khadr July 27, 2002
  • Faces a murder charge before a Guantanamo military commission.
  • Alleged to have been one of a small group of Afghans who failed to surrender.
  • Alleged to have fired on coalition forces, with his comrades.
  • When American forces searched the Afghan's compound, following an air-strike, after the thought the occupants were dead, a wounded Khadr is alleged to emerged from the rubble and tossed a grenade, which inflicted mortal wounds on Sergeant Christopher Speer.
Captives who the DoD asserts were captured, by Americans, following a raid where shots were fired
id name capture notes

References