User talk:Omega Mind

There is no Csd here. Geo Swan (talk) 10:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

I put a on the Gibbons's article, so my draft can't be searched for. Geo Swan (talk) 10:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

I don't think you're in a position to dispute my CSD claim, since you created the article. Even since you added more content, the article still serves the sole purpose of disparaging its subject. I'd like a third opinion here. Ω Mind^TALK 14:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

• The most prolific contributor here is User:Mathewignash. Is that whose opinion you want? User:Richard is the site owner. I started contributing here in 2012, and am coming up on 10,000 edits.
• Apologies, I said there was no CSD. I must have been remembering "WikiAlpha is an alternative to Wikipedia, where the main difference is that our deletion policy is far more lenient with regard to notability requirements," the first line of the Main Page... But that paragraph does point to WikiAlpha:Criteria for speedy deletion. However "disparaging the subject" is not one of the six criteria.
• Just to be clear, I don't know Gibbons. Do you know Gibbons? Are you arguing for the deletion of this material because you know Gibbons?
• Now, if you know of RS that show something admirable about Gibbons, by all means go ahead and add coverage of that material. Geo Swan (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

To quote from WA:CSD, under Vandalism and Spam: "This includes... pages that serve to threaten or disparage their subject with no other purpose." The Gibbins page certainly meets that criterion, so the page should be deleted without discussion, according to WikiAlpha policy. I don't know the different active editors on this site, but I imagine most level-headed unbiased editors would agree with my view on this (happy to be proved wrong - feel free to invite Mathewignash or whoever else to chime in). Ω Mind^TALK 09:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)