Google Watch

From WikiAlpha
Revision as of 23:45, 27 January 2013 by Geo Swan (Talk | contribs) (fix refs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Google Watch is a website launched in 2002 by Public Information Research.[1][2][3][4] PIR founder Daniel Brandt states that the website's goals are to report on conflicts of interest in Google's corporate structure, the public's dependency on it for information, invasion of privacy issues, and its increasing commercial links with private interests.

The site states: "Given that Google is so central to the web, whatever attitude it takes toward privacy has massive implications for the rest of the web in general, and for other search engines in particular."

Google Watch documents concerns about privacy risks arising from Google's use of long-lived HTTP cookies. More recently, the web site has highlighted the issue of "made for AdSense pages" — spam pages with content often scraped from other sites that sometimes enjoy high rankings in search engines due to sophisticated optimization techniques.

To illustrate the view that Google's search engine could be subjected to manipulation, Google Watch implemented a Google bomb by linking the phrase "out-of-touch executives" to Google's own page on its corporate management. The attempt was mistakenly attributed to disgruntled Google employees by The New York Times, which later printed a correction. This Google bomb still results in a top ranking on Yahoo!, but stopped working on Google in July 2004.

Google Watch continues to raise Google-related privacy issues, particularly its use of cookies which have a life span of more than 32 years and incorporate a unique ID that enables creation of a user data log. It has also made allegations about connections between Google and the NSA and the CIA.

Public Information Research has set up Scroogle, which enables people to use Google's search engine via an ad-free proxy server.

References

  1. Farhad Manjoo (2002-08-29). "Meet Mr. Anti-Google: A crusading webmaster says the popular search engine's page-ranking algorithm is "undemocratic."". Salon magazine. Archived from the original on 2013-01-27. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2F2002%2F08%2F29%2Fgoogle_watch%2F&date=2013-01-27. 
  2. Lawrence Lessig (2005-09-22). "Google Sued". Archived from the original on 2013-01-27. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lessig.org%2F2005%2F09%2Fgoogle-sued%2F&date=2013-01-27. 
  3. "Google Sued over Page Ranking". Slashdot. Archived from the original on 2013-01-27. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F02%2F10%2F21%2F1254221%2Fgoogle-sued-over-page-ranking&date=2013-01-27. 
  4. "Google Conspiracy Theory Alive and Well". highsearchengineranking.com. 2002-11-22. Archived from the original on 2013-01-27. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.high-search-engine-ranking.com%2Fsearch_engine_news_blog_Nov02.htm%23GoogleConspiracyTheoryAliveandWell&date=2013-01-27. 

See also