Democratic Party (United States)

From WikiAlpha
Jump to: navigation, search

{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= }}Template:Infobox political party

The Democratic Party is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States. Founded in 1828, it was predominantly built by Martin Van Buren, who assembled a wide cadre of politicians in every state behind war hero Andrew Jackson, making it the world's oldest active political party.[1][2][3] Its main political rival has been the Republican Party since the 1850s. Like the Republicans, the Democratic Party at a state level has traditionally been a big tent of competing and often opposing ideologies.[4][5] In recent times, both parties have homogenized greatly in their ideological views,[6] with modern American liberalism — a variant of social liberalism — being the majority ideology in the party.[7][8]

The historical predecessor of the Democratic Party is considered to be the Democratic-Republican Party.[9][10] Before 1860, the Democratic Party supported expansive presidential power,[11] the interests of slave states,[12] agrarianism,[13] and expansionism,[13] while opposing a national bank and high tariffs.[13] It split in 1860 over slavery and won the presidency only twice[note 1] between 1860 and 1910. In the late 19th century, it continued to oppose high tariffs and had fierce internal debates on the gold standard. In the early 20th century, it supported progressive reforms and opposed imperialism, with Woodrow Wilson winning the White House in 1912 and 1916. Since Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal coalition after 1932, the Democratic Party has promoted a social liberal platform, including Social Security and unemployment insurance.[14][7][15] The New Deal attracted strong support for the party from recent European immigrants but caused a decline of the party's conservative pro-business wing.[16][17][18] Following the Great Society era of progressive legislation under Lyndon B. Johnson, the core bases of the parties shifted, with the Southern states becoming more reliably Republican and the Northeastern states becoming more reliably Democratic.[19][20] The party's labor union element has become smaller since the 1970s,[21][22] and as the American electorate shifted in a more conservative direction following Ronald Reagan's presidency, the election of Bill Clinton marked a move for the party toward the Third Way, shifting the party's economic stance towards market-based economic policy.[23][24][25] Elected as the nation's first non-white President in 2008, Barack Obama oversaw the party's passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010.

The Democratic Party's philosophy of modern American liberalism blends cultural liberalism and social equality with support for a mixed capitalist economy.[26] On social issues, it advocates stricter gun laws,[27] abortion rights,[28] affirmative action programs,[29] LGBT rights,[30] criminal justice[31] and immigration reform,[32] along with the legalization of marijuana.[33] Expansion of social programs, health care reform, equal opportunity, and consumer protection form the core of the party's economic agenda.[34][35][36] Since the early 2010s, the Democratic Party has shifted significantly to the left on social, cultural, and religious issues.[37]

As of the 2020s, the party does best among voters who have high incomes,[38] are college-educated,[39] live in urban areas,[40] or are racial, religious, and sexual minorities.[41][42][43][44] Since the 1980s, the party has seen increased support whites with high incomes and college-education and lost support among voters who have lower incomes or lack college degrees.[42][45][46][47] As of 2024, the party holds the presidency and a majority in the U.S. Senate, as well as 24 state governorships, 19 state legislatures, and 17 state government trifectas. Three of the nine sitting U.S. Supreme Court justices were appointed by Democratic presidents. By registered members (in those states which permit or require registration by party affiliation), the Democratic Party is the largest party in the United States and the third largest in the world. Including the incumbent, Joe Biden, 16 Democrats have served as president of the United States.[7]

Template:TOC limit

Contents

History

File:Political Parties Derivation in the United States.svg
Political parties derivation. Dotted line means unofficially.
Democratic Party officials often trace its origins to the Democratic-Republican Party, founded by Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and other influential opponents of the conservative Federalists in 1792.[10][48] That party died out before the modern Democratic Party was organized[citation needed]; the Jeffersonian party also inspired the Whigs and modern Republicans[citation needed]. Historians argue that the modern Democratic Party was first organized in the late 1820s with the election of Andrew Jackson.[3] It was predominately built by Martin Van Buren, who assembled a wide cadre of politicians in every state behind war hero Andrew Jackson of Tennessee, making it the world's oldest active political party.[1][2][3]

Since the nomination of William Jennings Bryan in 1896, the party has generally positioned itself to the left of the Republican Party on economic issues. Democrats have been more liberal on civil rights since 1948, although conservative factions within the Democratic Party that opposed them persisted in the South until the 1960s. On foreign policy, both parties have changed positions several times.[49]

Background

The Democratic Party evolved from the Jeffersonian Republican or Democratic-Republican Party organized by Jefferson and Madison in opposition to the Federalist Party.[citation needed] The Democratic-Republican Party favored republicanism; a weak federal government; states' rights; agrarian interests (especially Southern planters); and strict adherence to the Constitution. The party opposed a national bank and Great Britain.[50] After the War of 1812, the Federalists virtually disappeared and the only national political party left was the Democratic-Republicans, which was prone to splinter along regional lines.[citation needed] The era of one-party rule in the United States, known as the Era of Good Feelings, lasted from 1816 until 1828, when Andrew Jackson became president. Jackson and Martin Van Buren worked with allies in each state to form a new Democratic Party on a national basis. In the 1830s, the Whig Party coalesced into the main rival to the Democrats.

Before 1860, the Democratic Party supported expansive presidential power,[11] the interests of slave states,[12] agrarianism,[13] and expansionism,[13] while opposing a national bank and high tariffs.[13]

19th century

Template:Further info

The Democratic-Republican Party split over the choice of a successor to President James Monroe.[citation needed] The faction that supported many of the old Jeffersonian principles, led by Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren, became the modern Democratic Party.[51] Historian Mary Beth Norton explains the transformation in 1828: Template:Blockquote

Behind the platforms issued by state and national parties stood a widely shared political outlook that characterized the Democrats: Template:Blockquote

Opposing factions led by Henry Clay helped form the Whig Party. The Democratic Party had a small yet decisive advantage over the Whigs until the 1850s when the Whigs fell apart over the issue of slavery. In 1854, angry with the Kansas–Nebraska Act, anti-slavery Democrats left the party and joined Northern Whigs to form the Republican Party.[52][53]

The Democrats split over slavery, with Northern and Southern tickets in the election of 1860, in which the Republican Party gained ascendancy.[54] The radical pro-slavery Fire-Eaters led walkouts at the two conventions when the delegates would not adopt a resolution supporting the extension of slavery into territories even if the voters of those territories did not want it. These Southern Democrats nominated the pro-slavery incumbent vice president, John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky, for president and General Joseph Lane, of Oregon, for vice president. The Northern Democrats nominated Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois for president and former Georgia Governor Herschel V. Johnson for vice president. This fracturing of the Democrats led to a Republican victory and Abraham Lincoln was elected the 16th president of the United States.[55]

File:Cleveland Inauguration 1885.jpg
The 1885 inauguration of Grover Cleveland, the only president with non-consecutive terms

As the American Civil War broke out, Northern Democrats were divided into War Democrats and Peace Democrats. The Confederate States of America deliberately avoided organized political parties. Most War Democrats rallied to Republican President Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans' National Union Party in the election of 1864, which featured Andrew Johnson on the Union ticket to attract fellow Democrats. Johnson replaced Lincoln in 1865, but he stayed independent of both parties.[56]

The Democrats benefited from white Southerners' resentment of Reconstruction after the war and consequent hostility to the Republican Party. After Redeemers ended Reconstruction in the 1870s and following the often extremely violent disenfranchisement of African Americans led by such white supremacist Democratic politicians as Benjamin Tillman of South Carolina in the 1880s and 1890s, the South, voting Democratic, became known as the "Solid South". Although Republicans won all but two presidential elections, the Democrats remained competitive. The party was dominated by pro-business Bourbon Democrats led by Samuel J. Tilden and Grover Cleveland, who represented mercantile, banking, and railroad interests; opposed imperialism and overseas expansion; fought for the gold standard; opposed bimetallism; and crusaded against corruption, high taxes and tariffs. Cleveland was elected to non-consecutive presidential terms in 1884 and 1892.[57]

20th century

Template:Further info

File:Breckinridgelong2.jpg
Leaders of the Democratic Party during the first half of the 20th century on 14 June 1913: Secretary of State William J. Bryan, Josephus Daniels, President Woodrow Wilson, Breckinridge Long, William Phillips, and Franklin D. Roosevelt

Early 20th century

Agrarian Democrats demanding free silver, drawing on Populist ideas, overthrew the Bourbon Democrats in 1896 and nominated William Jennings Bryan for the presidency (a nomination repeated by Democrats in 1900 and 1908). Bryan waged a vigorous campaign attacking Eastern moneyed interests, but he lost to Republican William McKinley.[58]

The Democrats took control of the House in 1910, and Woodrow Wilson won election as president in 1912 (when the Republicans split) and 1916. Wilson effectively led Congress to put to rest the issues of tariffs, money, and antitrust, which had dominated politics for 40 years, with new progressive laws. He failed to secure Senate passage of the Versailles Treaty (ending the war with Germany and joining the League of Nations).[59] The weak party was deeply divided by issues such as the KKK and prohibition in the 1920s. However, it did organize new ethnic voters in Northern cities.[60]

File:RooseveltTruman1944poster.jpg
Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman, 32nd and 33rd presidents of the United States (1933–1945; 1945–1953), featured on a campaign poster for the 1944 presidential election

Rise of New Deal Coalition (1930s–1960s)

The Great Depression in 1929 that began under Republican President Herbert Hoover and the Republican Congress set the stage for a more liberal government as the Democrats controlled the House of Representatives nearly uninterrupted from 1930 until 1994, the Senate for 44 of 48 years from 1930, and won most presidential elections until 1968. Franklin D. Roosevelt, elected to the presidency in 1932, came forth with federal government programs called the New Deal. New Deal liberalism meant the regulation of business (especially finance and banking) and the promotion of labor unions as well as federal spending to aid the unemployed, help distressed farmers and undertake large-scale public works projects. It marked the start of the American welfare state.[61] The opponents, who stressed opposition to unions, support for business and low taxes, started calling themselves "conservatives".[62]

Until the 1980s, the Democratic Party was a coalition of two parties divided by the Mason–Dixon line: liberal Democrats in the North and culturally conservative voters in the South, who though benefitting from many of the New Deal public works projects, opposed increasing civil rights initiatives advocated by northeastern liberals. The polarization grew stronger after Roosevelt died. Southern Democrats formed a key part of the bipartisan conservative coalition in an alliance with most of the Midwestern Republicans. The economically activist philosophy of Franklin D. Roosevelt, which has strongly influenced American liberalism, shaped much of the party's economic agenda after 1932.[63] From the 1930s to the mid-1960s, the liberal New Deal coalition usually controlled the presidency while the conservative coalition usually controlled Congress.[64]

1960s–1980s, collapse of New Deal Coalition

Issues facing parties and the United States after World War II included the Cold War and the civil rights movement. Republicans attracted conservatives and, after the 1960s, white Southerners from the Democratic coalition with their use of the Southern strategy and resistance to New Deal and Great Society liberalism. Until the 1950s, African Americans had traditionally supported the Republican Party because of its anti-slavery civil rights policies. Following the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Southern states became more reliably Republican in presidential politics, while Northeastern states became more reliably Democratic.[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] Studies show that Southern whites, which were a core constituency in the Democratic Party, shifted to the Republican Party due to racial conservatism.[71][73][74]
File:President Kennedy and Vice President Johnson prior to ceremony.jpg
John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, 35th and 36th presidents of the United States (1961–1963, 1963–1969)

The election of President John F. Kennedy from Massachusetts in 1960 partially reflected this shift. In the campaign, Kennedy attracted a new generation of younger voters. In his agenda dubbed the New Frontier, Kennedy introduced a host of social programs and public works projects, along with enhanced support of the space program, proposing a crewed spacecraft trip to the moon by the end of the decade. He pushed for civil rights initiatives and proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but with his assassination in November 1963, he was not able to see its passage.[75]

File:Jimmy Carter presents his State of the Union Speech to Congress. - NARA - 183085.tif
Jimmy Carter, 39th president of the United States (1977–1981), delivering the State of the Union Address in 1979

Kennedy's successor Lyndon B. Johnson was able to persuade the largely conservative Congress to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and with a more progressive Congress in 1965 passed much of the Great Society, including Medicare, which consisted of an array of social programs designed to help the poor, sick, and elderly. Kennedy and Johnson's advocacy of civil rights further solidified black support for the Democrats but had the effect of alienating Southern whites who would eventually gravitate toward the Republican Party, particularly after the election of Ronald Reagan to the presidency in 1980. The United States' involvement in the Vietnam War in the 1960s was another divisive issue that further fractured the fault lines of the Democrats' coalition. After the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964, President Johnson committed a large contingency of combat troops to Vietnam, but the escalation failed to drive the Viet Cong from South Vietnam, resulting in an increasing quagmire, which by 1968 had become the subject of widespread anti-war protests in the United States and elsewhere. With increasing casualties and nightly news reports bringing home troubling images from Vietnam, the costly military engagement became increasingly unpopular, alienating many of the kinds of young voters that the Democrats had attracted in the early 1960s. The protests that year along with assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Democratic presidential candidate Senator Robert F. Kennedy (younger brother of John F. Kennedy) climaxed in turbulence at the hotly-contested Democratic National Convention that summer in Chicago (which amongst the ensuing turmoil inside and outside of the convention hall nominated Vice President Hubert Humphrey) in a series of events that proved to mark a significant turning point in the decline of the Democratic Party's broad coalition.[76]

Republican presidential nominee Richard Nixon was able to capitalize on the confusion of the Democrats that year, and won the 1968 election to become the 37th president. He won re-election in a landslide in 1972 against Democratic nominee George McGovern, who like Robert F. Kennedy, reached out to the younger anti-war and counterculture voters, but unlike Kennedy, was not able to appeal to the party's more traditional white working-class constituencies. During Nixon's second term, his presidency was rocked by the Watergate scandal, which forced him to resign in 1974. He was succeeded by vice president Gerald Ford, who served a brief tenure. Watergate offered the Democrats an opportunity to recoup, and their nominee Jimmy Carter won the 1976 presidential election. With the initial support of evangelical Christian voters in the South, Carter was temporarily able to reunite the disparate factions within the party, but inflation and the Iran Hostage Crisis of 1979–1980 took their toll, resulting in a landslide victory for Republican presidential nominee Ronald Reagan in 1980, which shifted the political landscape in favor of the Republicans for years to come.[77][78]

1990s and Third Way centrism

File:Defense.gov News Photo 980217-D-9880W-016.jpg
Bill Clinton, 42nd president of the United States (1993–2001), speaking at The Pentagon in 1998

With the ascendancy of the Republicans under Ronald Reagan, the Democrats searched for ways to respond yet were unable to succeed by running traditional candidates, such as former vice president and Democratic presidential nominee Walter Mondale, who lost to Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.[citation needed] Many Democrats attached their hopes to the future star of Gary Hart, who had challenged Mondale in the 1984 primaries running on a theme of "New Ideas"; and in the subsequent 1988 primaries became the de facto front-runner and virtual "shoo-in" for the Democratic presidential nomination before a sex scandal ended his campaign. The party nevertheless began to seek out a younger generation of leaders, who like Hart had been inspired by the pragmatic idealism of John F. Kennedy.[79]

Arkansas governor Bill Clinton was one such figure, who was elected president in 1992 as the Democratic nominee. The Democratic Leadership Council was a campaign organization connected to Clinton that advocated a realignment and triangulation under the re-branded "New Democrat" label.[80][23][24] The party adopted a synthesis of neoliberal economic policies with cultural liberalism, with the voter base after Reagan having shifted considerably to the right.[80][citation needed] In an effort to appeal both to liberals and to fiscal conservatives, Democrats began to advocate for a balanced budget and market economy tempered by government intervention (mixed economy), along with a continued emphasis on social justice and affirmative action. The economic policy adopted by the Democratic Party, including the former Clinton administration, has been referred to as "Third Way".

The Democrats lost control of Congress in the election of 1994 to the Republican Party. Re-elected in 1996, Clinton was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to be elected to two terms.[81]

21st century

{{#invoke:Multiple image|render}}

2000s

In the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as well as the growing concern over global warming, some of the party's key issues in the early 21st century have included combating terrorism while preserving human rights, expanding access to health care, labor rights, and environmental protection. Democrats regained majority control of both the House and the Senate in the 2006 elections. Barack Obama won the Democratic Party's nomination and was elected as the first African American president in 2008. Under the Obama presidency, the party moved forward reforms including an economic stimulus package, the Dodd–Frank financial reform act, and the Affordable Care Act.[citation needed]

2010s

In the 2010 midterm elections, the Democratic Party lost control of the House and lost its majority in state legislatures and state governorships. In the 2012 elections, President Obama was re-elected, but the party remained in the minority in the House of Representatives and lost control of the Senate in the 2014 midterm elections. After the 2016 election of Donald Trump, the Democratic Party transitioned into the role of an opposition party and held neither the presidency nor the Senate but won back a majority in the House in the 2018 midterm elections.[82] Democrats were extremely critical of President Trump, particularly his policies on immigration, healthcare, and abortion, as well as his response to the COVID-19 pandemic.[83][84][85]

2020s

Since the early 2010s, the party has shifted significantly to the left on social, cultural, and religious issues and attracted support from college-educated white Americans.[37]

In November 2020, Democrat Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election.[86] He began his term with narrow Democratic majorities in the House and the Senate.[87][88] The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was negotiated by Biden, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema and other Democrats and is the largest allocation of funds for climate to date.[89][90]

Name and symbols

{{#invoke:Multiple image|render}}

The Democratic-Republican Party splintered in 1824 into the short-lived National Republican Party and the Jacksonian movement which in 1828 became the Democratic Party. Under the Jacksonian era, the term "The Democracy" was in use by the party, but the name "Democratic Party" was eventually settled upon[91] and became the official name in 1844.[92] Members of the party are called "Democrats" or "Dems".

The term "Democrat Party" has also been in local use but has usually been used by opponents since 1952 as a disparaging term. However, the use of the term "Democrat" as an adjective is not generally considered offensive in other contexts, such as "Democrat President", "Democrat Voters", "Democrat Senators", "Democrat Candidate", "Democrat Governor", etc. Nonetheless, its usage is still incorrect.

The most common mascot symbol for the party has been the donkey, or jackass.[93] Andrew Jackson's enemies twisted his name to "jackass" as a term of ridicule regarding a stupid and stubborn animal. However, the Democrats liked the common-man implications and picked it up too, therefore the image persisted and evolved.[94] Its most lasting impression came from the cartoons of Thomas Nast from 1870 in Harper's Weekly. Cartoonists followed Nast and used the donkey to represent the Democrats and the elephant to represent the Republicans.

In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Democratic Party in Indiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Ohio was the rooster, as opposed to the Republican eagle. This symbol still appears on Oklahoma, Kentucky, Indiana, and West Virginia ballots.[95] The rooster was adopted as the official symbol of the national Democratic Party.[96] In New York, the Democratic ballot symbol is a five-pointed star.[97]

Although both major political parties (and many minor ones) use the traditional American colors of red, white, and blue in their marketing and representations, since election night 2000 blue has become the identifying color for the Democratic Party while red has become the identifying color for the Republican Party. That night, for the first time all major broadcast television networks used the same color scheme for the electoral map: blue states for Al Gore (Democratic nominee) and red states for George W. Bush (Republican nominee). Since then, the color blue has been widely used by the media to represent the party. This is contrary to common practice outside of the United States where blue is the traditional color of the right and red the color of the left.[98] For example, in Canada red represents the Liberals while blue represents the Conservatives. In the United Kingdom, red denotes the Labour Party and blue symbolizes the Conservative Party. Any use of the color blue to denote the Democratic Party prior to 2000 would be historically inaccurate and misleading. Since 2000, blue has also been used both by party supporters for promotional efforts—ActBlue, BuyBlue and BlueFund as examples—and by the party itself in 2006 both for its "Red to Blue Program", created to support Democratic candidates running against Republican incumbents in the midterm elections that year and on its official website.

In September 2010, the Democratic Party unveiled its new logo, which featured a blue D inside a blue circle. It was the party's first official logo; the donkey logo had been only semi-official.

Jefferson-Jackson Day is the annual fundraising event (dinner) held by Democratic Party organizations across the United States.[99] It is named after Presidents Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, whom the party regards as its distinguished early leaders.

The song "Happy Days Are Here Again" is the unofficial song of the Democratic Party. It was used prominently when Franklin D. Roosevelt was nominated for president at the 1932 Democratic National Convention and remains a sentimental favorite for Democrats today. For example, Paul Shaffer played the theme on the Late Show with David Letterman after the Democrats won Congress in 2006. "Don't Stop" by Fleetwood Mac was adopted by Bill Clinton's presidential campaign in 1992 and has endured as a popular Democratic song. The emotionally similar song "Beautiful Day" by the band U2 has also become a favorite theme song for Democratic candidates. John Kerry used the song during his 2004 presidential campaign and several Democratic Congressional candidates used it as a celebratory tune in 2006.[100][101]

As a traditional anthem for its presidential nominating convention, Aaron Copland's "Fanfare for the Common Man" is traditionally performed at the beginning of the Democratic National Convention.

Current structure and composition

National committee

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is responsible for promoting Democratic campaign activities. While the DNC is responsible for overseeing the process of writing the Democratic Platform, the DNC is more focused on campaign and organizational strategy than public policy. In presidential elections, it supervises the Democratic National Convention. The national convention is subject to the charter of the party and the ultimate authority within the Democratic Party when it is in session, with the DNC running the party's organization at other times. The DNC is chaired by Jaime Harrison.[102]

State parties

Each state also has a state committee, made up of elected committee members as well as ex officio committee members (usually elected officials and representatives of major constituencies), which in turn elects a chair. County, town, city, and ward committees generally are composed of individuals elected at the local level. State and local committees often coordinate campaign activities within their jurisdiction, oversee local conventions, and in some cases primaries or caucuses, and may have a role in nominating candidates for elected office under state law. Rarely do they have much funding, but in 2005 DNC Chairman Dean began a program (called the "50 State Strategy") of using DNC national funds to assist all state parties and pay for full-time professional staffers.[103]

Major party groups

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) assists party candidates in House races and its current chairman (selected by the party caucus) is Representative Sean Patrick Maloney of New York. Similarly, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), headed by Senator Gary Peters of Michigan, raises funds for Senate races. The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), chaired by Majority Leader of the New York State Senate Andrea Stewart-Cousins, is a smaller organization that focuses on state legislative races. The DNC sponsors the College Democrats of America (CDA), a student-outreach organization with the goal of training and engaging a new generation of Democratic activists. Democrats Abroad is the organization for Americans living outside the United States. They work to advance the party's goals and encourage Americans living abroad to support the Democrats. The Young Democrats of America (YDA) and the High School Democrats of America (HSDA) are young adult and youth-led organizations respectively that attempt to draw in and mobilize young people for Democratic candidates but operates outside of the DNC. The Democratic Governors Association (DGA) is an organization supporting the candidacies of Democratic gubernatorial nominees and incumbents. Likewise, the mayors of the largest cities and urban centers convene as the National Conference of Democratic Mayors.[104]

Ideology

Template:Liberalism US

Upon foundation, the Democratic Party supported agrarianism and the Jacksonian democracy movement of President Andrew Jackson, representing farmers and rural interests and traditional Jeffersonian democrats.[105] Since the 1890s, especially in northern states, the party began to favor more liberal positions (the term "liberal" in this sense describes modern liberalism, rather than classical liberalism or economic liberalism). In recent exit polls, the Democratic Party has had broad appeal across all socio-ethno-economic demographics.[106][107][108]

Historically, the party has represented farmers, laborers, and religious and ethnic minorities as it has opposed unregulated business and finance and favored progressive income taxes. In foreign policy, internationalism (including interventionism) was a dominant theme from 1913 to the mid-1960s. In the 1930s, the party began advocating social programs targeted at the poor. The party had a fiscally conservative, pro-business wing, typified by Grover Cleveland and Al Smith, and a Southern conservative wing that shrank after President Lyndon B. Johnson supported the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The major influences for liberalism were labor unions (which peaked in the 1936–1952 era) and African Americans. Environmentalism has been a major component since the 1970s. The 21st century Democratic Party is predominantly a coalition of centrists, liberals, and progressives, with significant overlap between the three groups.[109] Political scientists characterize the Democratic Party as less ideologically cohesive than the Republican Party due to the broader diversity of coalitions that compose the Democratic Party.[110][111][112]

The Democratic Party, once dominant in the Southeastern United States, is now strongest in the Northeast (Mid-Atlantic and New England), the Great Lakes region, and the West Coast (including Hawaii). The party is also very strong in major cities (regardless of region).[113]

Centrists

Centrist Democrats, or New Democrats, are an ideologically centrist faction within the Democratic Party that emerged after the victory of Republican George H. W. Bush in the 1988 presidential election. They are an economically liberal and "Third Way" faction which dominated the party for around 20 years starting in the late 1980s after the United States populace turned much further to the political right. They are represented by organizations such as the New Democrat Network and the New Democrat Coalition. The New Democrat Coalition is a pro-growth and fiscally moderate congressional coalition.[114]

One of the most influential centrist groups was the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), a nonprofit organization that advocated centrist positions for the party. The DLC hailed President Bill Clinton as proof of the viability of "Third Way" politicians and a DLC success story. The DLC disbanded in 2011 and much of the former DLC is now represented in the think tank Third Way.[115]

Some Democratic elected officials have self-declared as being centrists, including former President Bill Clinton, former Vice President Al Gore, Senator Mark Warner, former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell, former Senator Jim Webb, President Joe Biden, congresswoman Ann Kirkpatrick, and former congressman Dave McCurdy.[116][117]

The New Democrat Network supports socially liberal and fiscally moderate Democratic politicians and is associated with the congressional New Democrat Coalition in the House.[118] Suzan DelBene is the chair of the coalition,[116] and former senator and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton was a member while in Congress.[119] In 2009, President Barack Obama was self-described as a New Democrat.[120]

Conservatives

A conservative Democrat is a member of the Democratic Party with conservative political views, or with views relatively conservative with respect to those of the national party. While such members of the Democratic Party can be found throughout the nation, actual elected officials are disproportionately found within the Southern states and to a lesser extent within rural regions of the United States generally, more commonly in the West. Historically, Southern Democrats were generally much more ideologically conservative than conservative Democrats are now.

Many conservative Southern Democrats defected to the Republican Party, beginning with the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the general leftward shift of the party. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, Billy Tauzin of Louisiana, Kent Hance and Ralph Hall of Texas and Richard Shelby of Alabama are examples of this. The influx of conservative Democrats into the Republican Party is often cited as a reason for the Republican Party's shift further to the right during the late 20th century as well as the shift of its base from the Northeast and Midwest to the South.

Into the 1980s, the Democratic Party had a conservative element, mostly from the South and Border regions. Their numbers declined sharply as the Republican Party built up its Southern base. They were sometimes humorously called "Yellow dog Democrats", or "boll weevils" and "Dixiecrats". In the House, they form the Blue Dog Coalition, a caucus of conservatives and centrists willing to broker compromises with the Republican leadership. They have acted as a unified voting bloc in the past, giving its members some ability to change legislation, depending on their numbers in Congress.

Split-ticket voting was common among conservative Southern Democrats in the 1970s and 1980s. These voters supported conservative Democrats for local and statewide office while simultaneously voting for Republican presidential candidates.[121]

Liberals

Social liberals (modern liberals) are a large portion of the Democratic base. According to 2018 exit polls, liberals constituted 27% of the electorate, and 91% of American liberals favored the candidate of the Democratic Party.[122] White-collar college-educated professionals were mostly Republican until the 1950s, but they now compose a vital component of the Democratic Party.[123]

A large majority of liberals favor moving toward universal health care, with many supporting an eventual gradual transition to a single-payer system in particular. A majority also favor diplomacy over military action; stem cell research; the legalization of same-sex marriage; stricter gun control and environmental protection laws as well as the preservation of abortion rights. Immigration and cultural diversity are deemed positive as liberals favor cultural pluralism, a system in which immigrants retain their native culture in addition to adopting their new culture. They tend to be divided on free trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and organizations, with some seeing them as more favorable to corporations than workers. Most liberals oppose increased military spending and the mixing of church and state.[124]

This ideological group differs from the traditional organized labor base. According to the Pew Research Center, a plurality of 41% resided in mass affluent households and 49% were college graduates, the highest figure of any typographical group. It was also the fastest growing typological group between the late 1990s and early 2000s.[124] Liberals include most of academia[125] and large portions of the professional class.[106][107][108]

Progressives

Progressives are the most left-leaning faction in the party and support strong business regulations, social programs, and workers' rights.[126][127] Progressive ideological stances have much in common with the programs of European countries as well as many East Asian countries. Many progressive Democrats are descendants of the New Left of Democratic presidential candidate Senator George McGovern of South Dakota whereas others were involved in the 2016 presidential candidacy of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders. Progressives are often considered to have ideas similar to social democracy due to heavy inspiration from the nordic model, believing in federal top marginal income taxes ranging from 52% to 70%,[128] rent control,[129] increased collective bargaining power, a $15-an-hour minimum wage, as well as free tuition and Universal Healthcare (typically Medicare for All).[130]

In 2014, progressive Senator Elizabeth Warren set out "Eleven Commandments of Progressivism": tougher regulation on corporations; affordable education; scientific investment and environmentalism; net neutrality; increased wages; equal pay for women; collective bargaining rights; defending social programs; same-sex marriage; immigration reform; and unabridged access to reproductive healthcare.[131] In addition, progressives strongly oppose political corruption and seek to advance electoral reforms such as campaign finance rules and voting rights protections.[132] Today, many progressives have made combating economic inequality their top priority.[133]

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is a caucus of progressive Democrats chaired by Pramila Jayapal of Washington.[134] Its members have included Representatives Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, John Conyers of Michigan, Jim McDermott of Washington, Barbara Lee of California, and Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota. Senators Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, and Ed Markey of Massachusetts were members of the caucus when in the House of Representatives. While no Democratic senators currently belong to the CPC, independent Senator Bernie Sanders is a member.[135]

Political positions

Economic policy
Social policy

Economic issues

Equal economic opportunity, a social safety net, and strong labor unions have historically been at the heart of Democratic economic policy.[26] The Democratic Party's economic policy positions, as measured by votes in Congress, tend to align with those of middle class.[157][158][159][160][161] Democrats support a progressive tax system, higher minimum wages, Social Security, universal health care, public education, and subsidized housing.[26] They also support infrastructure development and clean energy investments to achieve economic development and job creation.[162] Since the 1990s, the party has at times supported centrist economic reforms that cut the size of government and reduced market regulations.[163] The party has generally rejected both laissez-faire economics and market socialism, instead favoring Keynesian economics within a capitalist market-based system.[164]

Fiscal policy

Democrats support a more progressive tax structure to provide more services and reduce economic inequality by making sure that the wealthiest Americans pay more in taxes.[165] They oppose the cutting of social services, such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid,[166] believing it to be harmful to efficiency and social justice. Democrats believe the benefits of social services in monetary and non-monetary terms are a more productive labor force and cultured population and believe that the benefits of this are greater than any benefits that could be derived from lower taxes, especially on top earners, or cuts to social services. Furthermore, Democrats see social services as essential toward providing positive freedom, freedom derived from economic opportunity. The Democratic-led House of Representatives reinstated the PAYGO (pay-as-you-go) budget rule at the start of the 110th Congress.[167]

Minimum wage

The Democratic Party favors raising the minimum wage. The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 was an early component of the Democrats' agenda during the 110th Congress. In 2006, the Democrats supported six state-ballot initiatives to increase the minimum wage and all six initiatives passed.[168]

In 2017, Senate Democrats introduced the Raise the Wage Act which would raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2024.[169] In 2021, Democratic president Joe Biden proposed increasing the minimum wage to $15 by 2025.[170] In many states controlled by Democrats, the state minimum wage has been increased to a rate above the federal minimum wage.[171]

Health care

File:Obama signing health care-20100323.jpg
President Barack Obama signing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law at the White House on March 23, 2010

Democrats call for "affordable and quality health care" and favor moving toward universal health care in a variety of forms to address rising healthcare costs. Progressive Democrats politicians favor a single-payer program or Medicare for All, while liberals prefer creating a public health insurance option.[172]

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010, has been one of the most significant pushes for universal health care. As of December 2019, more than 20 million Americans have gained health insurance under the Affordable Care Act.[173]

Education

Democrats favor improving public education by raising school standards and reforming the Head Start program. They also support universal preschool and expanding access to primary education, including through charter schools. They call for addressing student loan debt and reforms to reduce college tuition.[174] Other proposals have included tuition-free public universities and reform of standardized testing. Democrats have the long-term aim of having publicly funded college education with low tuition fees (like in much of Europe and Canada), which would be available to every eligible American student. Alternatively, they encourage expanding access to post-secondary education by increasing state funding for student financial aid such as Pell Grants and college tuition tax deductions.[175]

Environment

{{#invoke:Multiple image|render}} {{#invoke:Multiple image|render}} Democrats believe that the government should protect the environment and have a history of environmentalism. In more recent years, this stance has emphasized renewable energy generation as the basis for an improved economy, greater national security, and general environmental benefits.[176] The Democratic Party is substantially more likely than the Republican Party to support environmental regulation and policies that are supportive of renewable energy.[177][178]

The Democratic Party also favors expansion of conservation lands and encourages open space and rail travel to relieve highway and airport congestion and improve air quality and the economy as it "believe[s] that communities, environmental interests, and the government should work together to protect resources while ensuring the vitality of local economies. Once Americans were led to believe they had to make a choice between the economy and the environment. They now know this is a false choice".[179]

The foremost environmental concern of the Democratic Party is climate change. Democrats, most notably former Vice President Al Gore, have pressed for stern regulation of greenhouse gases. On October 15, 2007, Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to build greater knowledge about man-made climate change and laying the foundations for the measures needed to counteract it.[180]

Renewable energy and fossil fuels

Democrats have supported increased domestic renewable energy development, including wind and solar power farms, in an effort to reduce carbon pollution. The party's platform calls for an "all of the above" energy policy including clean energy, natural gas and domestic oil, with the desire of becoming energy independent.[168] The party has supported higher taxes on oil companies and increased regulations on coal power plants, favoring a policy of reducing long-term reliance on fossil fuels.[181][182] Additionally, the party supports stricter fuel emissions standards to prevent air pollution.

Trade agreements

Many Democrats support fair trade policies when it comes to the issue of international trade agreements and some in the party have started supporting free trade in recent decades.[183] In the 1990s, the Clinton administration and a number of prominent Democrats pushed through a number of agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Since then, the party's shift away from free trade became evident in the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) vote, with 15 House Democrats voting for the agreement and 187 voting against.[184][185]

Social issues

File:Shirley Chisholm.jpg
Shirley Chisholm was the first major-party African American candidate to run nationwide primary campaigns.

The modern Democratic Party emphasizes social equality and equal opportunity. Democrats support voting rights and minority rights, including LGBT rights. The party championed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which for the first time outlawed segregation. Carmines and Stimson wrote "the Democratic Party appropriated racial liberalism and assumed federal responsibility for ending racial discrimination."[186][187][188]

Ideological social elements in the party include cultural liberalism, civil libertarianism, and feminism. Some Democratic social policies are immigration reform, electoral reform, and women's reproductive rights.

Equal opportunity

The Democratic Party supports equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of sex, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, creed, or national origin. Many Democrats support affirmative action programs to further this goal. Democrats also strongly support the Americans with Disabilities Act to prohibit discrimination against people based on physical or mental disability. As such, the Democrats pushed as well the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, a disability rights expansion that became law.[189]

Voting rights

The party is very supportive of improving voting rights as well as election accuracy and accessibility.[190] They support extensions of voting time, including making election day a holiday. They support reforming the electoral system to eliminate gerrymandering, abolishing the electoral college, as well as passing comprehensive campaign finance reform.[151]

Abortion and reproductive rights

The Democratic Party believes that all women should have access to birth control and supports public funding of contraception for poor women. In its national platforms from 1992 to 2004, the Democratic Party has called for abortion to be "safe, legal and rare"—namely, keeping it legal by rejecting laws that allow governmental interference in abortion decisions and reducing the number of abortions by promoting both knowledge of reproduction and contraception and incentives for adoption. The wording changed in the 2008 platform. When Congress voted on the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act in 2003, Congressional Democrats were split, with a minority (including former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid) supporting the ban and the majority of Democrats opposing the legislation.[191]

The Democratic Party opposes attempts to reverse the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade, which declared abortion covered by the constitutionally protected individual right to privacy under the Ninth Amendment; and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which lays out the legal framework in which government action alleged to violate that right is assessed by courts. As a matter of the right to privacy and of gender equality, many Democrats believe all women should have the ability to choose to abort without governmental interference. They believe that each woman, conferring with her conscience, has the right to choose for herself whether abortion is morally correct.

Former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid was anti-abortion,[citation needed] while former President Barack Obama and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi favor abortion rights. Groups such as Democrats for Life of America represent the anti-abortion faction of the party while groups such as EMILY's List represent the abortion rights faction. A Newsweek poll from October 2006 found that 25% of Democrats were anti-abortion while a 69% majority was in favor of abortion rights.[192]

According to the 2020 Democratic Party platform, "Democrats believe every woman should be able to access high-quality reproductive health care services, including safe and legal abortion."[193]

Immigration

Many Democratic politicians have called for systematic reform of the immigration system such that residents that have come into the United States illegally have a pathway to legal citizenship. President Obama remarked in November 2013 that he felt it was "long past time to fix our broken immigration system," particularly to allow "incredibly bright young people" that came over as students to become full citizens. The Public Religion Research Institute found in a late 2013 study that 73% of Democrats supported the pathway concept, compared to 63% of Americans as a whole.[194]

In 2013, Democrats in the Senate passed S. 744, which would reform immigration policy to allow citizenship for illegal immigrants in the United States and improve the lives of all immigrants currently living in the United States.[195]

LGBT rights

Similar to the Republican Party, the Democratic position on LGBT rights has changed significantly over time, and there has been continuously increasing support among both parties on the issue.[196][197] Before the 2000s, like the Republicans, the Democratic Party often took positions hostile to LGBT rights. Today, both voters and elected representatives within the Democratic Party are overwhelmingly supportive of LGBT rights.[196]

Support for same-sex marriage has increased in the past decade according to ABC News. An April 2009 ABC News/Washington Post public opinion poll put support among Democrats at 62%[198] whereas a June 2008 Newsweek poll found that 42% of Democrats support same-sex marriage while 23% support civil unions or domestic partnership laws and 28% oppose any legal recognition at all.[199] A broad majority of Democrats have supported other LGBT-related laws such as extending hate crime statutes, legally preventing discrimination against LGBT people in the workforce and repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" military policy. A 2006 Pew Research Center poll of Democrats found that 55% supported gays adopting children with 40% opposed while 70% support gays in the military, with only 23% opposed.[200] Gallup polling from May 2009 stated that 82% of Democrats support open enlistment.[201]

The 2004 Democratic National Platform stated that marriage should be defined at the state level and it repudiated the Federal Marriage Amendment.[202] While not stating support of same-sex marriage, the 2008 platform called for repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, which banned federal recognition of same-sex marriage and removed the need for interstate recognition, supported antidiscrimination laws and the extension of hate crime laws to LGBT people and opposed "don't ask, don't tell".[203] The 2012 platform included support for same-sex marriage and for the repeal of DOMA.[30]

On May 9, 2012, Barack Obama became the first sitting president to say he supports same-sex marriage.[204][205] Previously, he had opposed restrictions on same-sex marriage such as the Defense of Marriage Act, which he promised to repeal,[206] California's Prop 8,[207] and a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage (which he opposed saying that "decisions about marriage should be left to the states as they always have been"),[208] but also stated that he personally believed marriage to be between a man and a woman and that he favored civil unions that would "give same-sex couples equal legal rights and privileges as married couples".[206] Earlier, when running for the Illinois Senate in 1996 he said, "I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages".[209] John Kerry, Democratic presidential candidate in 2004, did not support same-sex marriage. Former presidents Bill Clinton[210] and Jimmy Carter[211] and former vice presidents Al Gore[212] and Walter Mondale[213] also support gay marriage. President Joe Biden has been in favor of same-sex marriage since 2012 when he became the highest-ranking government official to support it.[214]

Puerto Rico

The 2016 Democratic Party platform declares: "We are committed to addressing the extraordinary challenges faced by our fellow citizens in Puerto Rico. Many stem from the fundamental question of Puerto Rico's political status. Democrats believe that the people of Puerto Rico should determine their ultimate political status from permanent options that do not conflict with the Constitution, laws, and policies of the United States. Democrats are committed to promoting economic opportunity and good-paying jobs for the hardworking people of Puerto Rico. We also believe that Puerto Ricans must be treated equally by Medicare, Medicaid, and other programs that benefit families. Puerto Ricans should be able to vote for the people who make their laws, just as they should be treated equally. All American citizens, no matter where they reside, should have the right to vote for the president of the United States. Finally, we believe that federal officials must respect Puerto Rico's local self-government as laws are implemented and Puerto Rico's budget and debt are restructured so that it can get on a path towards stability and prosperity".[142]

Legal issues

Gun control

File:20210420 Gun control survey by political party - Pew Research.svg
U.S. opinion on gun control issues is deeply divided along political lines, as shown in this 2021 survey.[215]

With a stated goal of reducing crime and homicide, the Democratic Party has introduced various gun control measures, most notably the Gun Control Act of 1968, the Brady Bill of 1993 and Crime Control Act of 1994. However, some Democrats, especially rural, Southern, and Western Democrats, favor fewer restrictions on firearm possession and warned the party was defeated in the 2000 presidential election in rural areas because of the issue.[216] In the national platform for 2008, the only statement explicitly favoring gun control was a plan calling for renewal of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban.[217] In 2022, Democratic president Joe Biden signed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which among other things expanded background checks and provided incentives for states to pass red flag laws.[218]

Death penalty

The Democratic Party currently opposes the death penalty.[156] Although most Democrats in Congress have never seriously moved to overturn the rarely used federal death penalty, both Russ Feingold and Dennis Kucinich have introduced such bills with little success. Democrats have led efforts to overturn state death penalty laws, particularly in New Jersey and in New Mexico. They have also sought to prevent the reinstatement of the death penalty in those states which prohibit it, including Massachusetts, New York, and Delaware. During the Clinton administration, Democrats led the expansion of the federal death penalty. These efforts resulted in the passage of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, signed into law by President Clinton, which heavily limited appeals in death penalty cases. In 1972, the Democratic Party platform called for the abolition of capital punishment.[219] In 1992, 1993 and 1995, Democratic Texas Congressman Henry González unsuccessfully introduced the Death Penalty Abolition Amendment which prohibited the use of capital punishment in the United States. Democratic Missouri Congressman William Lacy Clay, Sr. cosponsored the amendment in 1993.

During his Illinois Senate career, former President Barack Obama successfully introduced legislation intended to reduce the likelihood of wrongful convictions in capital cases, requiring videotaping of confessions. When campaigning for the presidency, Obama stated that he supports the limited use of the death penalty, including for people who have been convicted of raping a minor under the age of 12, having opposed the Supreme Court's ruling in Kennedy v. Louisiana that the death penalty was unconstitutional in which the victim of a crime was not killed.[220] Obama has stated that he thinks the "death penalty does little to deter crime" and that it is used too frequently and too inconsistently.[221]

In June 2016, the Democratic Platform Drafting Committee unanimously adopted an amendment to abolish the death penalty.[222]

Torture

Many Democrats are opposed to the use of torture against individuals apprehended and held prisoner by the United States military and hold that categorizing such prisoners as unlawful combatants does not release the United States from its obligations under the Geneva Conventions. Democrats contend that torture is inhumane, damages the United States' moral standing in the world, and produces questionable results. Democrats are largely against waterboarding.[223]

Torture became a divisive issue in the party after Barack Obama was elected president.[224]

Patriot Act

Many Democrats are opposed to the Patriot Act, but when the law was passed most Democrats were supportive of it and all but two Democrats in the Senate voted for the original Patriot Act legislation in 2001. The lone nay vote was from Russ Feingold of Wisconsin as Mary Landrieu of Louisiana did not vote.[225] In the House, the Democrats voted for the Act by 145 yea and 62 nay. Democrats were split on the renewal in 2006. In the Senate, Democrats voted 34 for the 2006 renewal and nine against. In the House, Democrats voted 66 voted for the renewal and 124 against.[226]

Privacy

The Democratic Party believes that individuals should have a right to privacy. For example, many Democrats have opposed the NSA warrantless surveillance of American citizens.

Some Democratic officeholders have championed consumer protection laws that limit the sharing of consumer data between corporations. Democrats have opposed sodomy laws since the 1972 platform which stated that "Americans should be free to make their own choice of life-styles and private habits without being subject to discrimination or prosecution",[227] and believe that government should not regulate consensual noncommercial sexual conduct among adults as a matter of personal privacy.[228]

Foreign policy issues

The foreign policy of the voters of the two major parties has largely overlapped since the 1990s. A Gallup poll in early 2013 showed broad agreement on the top issues, albeit with some divergence regarding human rights and international cooperation through agencies such as the United Nations.[229]

In June 2014, the Quinnipiac Poll asked Americans which foreign policy they preferred:

Template:Blockquote

Democrats chose A over B by 65% to 32%; Republicans chose A over B by 56% to 39%; and independents chose A over B by 67% to 29%.[230]

Iraq War

File:Barack Obama 2008 Iraq 19.jpg
Then-Senator Barack Obama shaking hands with an American soldier in Basra, Iraq, in 2008

In 2002, Congressional Democrats were divided on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq: 147 voted against it (21 in the Senate and 126 in the House) and 110 voted for it (29 in the Senate and 81 in the House). Since then, many prominent Democrats, such as former senator John Edwards, have expressed regret about this decision and have called it a mistake while others, such as Senator Hillary Clinton, have criticized the conduct of the war yet not repudiated their initial vote for it (though Clinton later went on to repudiate her stance during the 2008 primaries). Referring to Iraq, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared in April 2007 the war to be "lost" while other Democrats (especially during the 2004 presidential election cycle) accused the President of lying to the public about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Among lawmakers, Democrats are the most vocal opponents of Operation Iraqi Freedom and campaigned on a platform of withdrawal ahead of the 2006 midterm elections.

A March 2003 CBS News poll taken a few days before the invasion of Iraq found that 34% of Democrats nationwide would support it without United Nations backing, 51% would support it only with its backing and 14% would not support it at all.[231] The Los Angeles Times stated in early April 2003 that 70% of Democrats supported the decision to invade while 27% opposed it.[232] The Pew Research Center stated in August 2007 that opposition increased from 37% during the initial invasion to 74%.[233] In April 2008, a CBS News poll found that about 90% of Democrats disapprove of the Bush administration's conduct and want to end the war within the next year.[234]

Democrats in the House of Representatives near-unanimously supported a non-binding resolution disapproving of President Bush's decision to send additional troops into Iraq in 2007. Congressional Democrats overwhelmingly supported military funding legislation that included a provision that set "a timeline for the withdrawal of all US combat troops from Iraq" by March 31, 2008, but also would leave combat forces in Iraq for purposes such as targeted counter-terrorism operations.[235][236] After a veto from the President and a failed attempt in Congress to override the veto,[237] the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 was passed by Congress and signed by the President after the timetable was dropped. Criticism of the Iraq War subsided after the Iraq War troop surge of 2007 led to a dramatic decrease in Iraqi violence. The Democratic-controlled 110th Congress continued to fund efforts in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Presidential candidate Barack Obama advocated a withdrawal of combat troops within Iraq by late 2010 with a residual force of peacekeeping troops left in place.[238] He stated that both the speed of withdrawal and the number of troops left over would be "entirely conditions-based".[238]

On February 27, 2009, President Obama announced: "As a candidate for president, I made clear my support for a timeline of 16 months to carry out this drawdown, while pledging to consult closely with our military commanders upon taking office to ensure that we preserve the gains we've made and protect our troops ... Those consultations are now complete, and I have chosen a timeline that will remove our combat brigades over the next 18 months".[239] Around 50,000 non-combat-related forces would remain.[239] Obama's plan drew wide bipartisan support, including that of defeated Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain.[239]Template:Update inline

Iran sanctions

The Democratic Party has been critical of the Iran's nuclear weapon program and supported economic sanctions against the Iranian government. In 2013, the Democratic-led administration worked to reach a diplomatic agreement with the government of Iran to halt the Iranian nuclear weapon program in exchange for international economic sanction relief.[240] As of 2014, negotiations had been successful and the party called for more cooperation with Iran in the future.[241] In 2015, the Obama administration agreed to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which provides sanction relief in exchange for international oversight of the Iranian nuclear program. In February 2019, the Democratic National Committee passed a resolution calling on the United States to re-enter the JCPOA, which President Trump withdrew from in 2018.[242]

Invasion of Afghanistan

Democrats in the House of Representatives and in the Senate near-unanimously voted for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists against "those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States" in Afghanistan in 2001, supporting the NATO coalition invasion of the nation. Most elected Democrats continued to support the Afghanistan conflict for its duration, with some, such as a Democratic National Committee spokesperson, voicing concerns that the Iraq War shifted too many resources away from the presence in Afghanistan.[243][244] During the 2008 Presidential Election, then-candidate Barack Obama called for a "surge" of troops into Afghanistan.[244] After winning the presidency, Obama followed through, sending a "surge" force of additional troops to Afghanistan. Troop levels were 94,000 in December 2011 and kept falling, with a target of 68,000 by fall 2012. Obama originally planned to bring all the troops home by 2014, but while the number of troops in the country did decline, several thousand remained at the end of his presidency.[245]

Support for the war among the American people diminished over time. Many Democrats changed their opinion over the course of the war, coming to oppose continuation of the conflict.[246][247] In July 2008, Gallup found that 41% of Democrats called the invasion a "mistake" while a 55% majority disagreed. In contrast, Republicans were more supportive of the war. The survey described Democrats as evenly divided about whether or not more troops should be sent—56% support it if it would mean removing troops from Iraq and only 47% support it otherwise.[247] A CNN survey in August 2009 stated that a majority of Democrats opposed the war. CNN polling director Keating Holland said: "Nearly two thirds of Republicans support the war in Afghanistan. Three quarters of Democrats oppose the war".[246] An August 2009 Washington Post poll found similar results, and the paper stated that Obama's policies would anger his closest supporters.[248]

During the 2020 Presidential Election, then-candidate Joe Biden promised to "end the forever wars in Afghanistan and the Middle East."[249] Biden went on to win the election, and in April 2021, he announced he would withdraw all US troops from Afghanistan by September 11 of that year.[250] The last troops left in August, bringing America's 20-year-long military campaign in the country to a close.[251]

Israel

The Democratic Party has both recently and historically supported Israel.[252][253] A 2008 Gallup poll found that 64% of Americans have a favorable image of Israel while only 16% say that they have a favorable image of the Palestinian Authority.[252] A pro-Israel view is held by the party leadership although some Democrats, including former President Jimmy Carter, have criticized Israel.[253]

The 2008 Democratic Party platform acknowledges a "special relationship with Israel, grounded in shared interests and shared values, and a clear, strong, fundamental commitment to the security of Israel, our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy." It also included:

It is in the best interests of all parties, including the United States, that we take an active role to help secure a lasting settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with a democratic, viable Palestinian state dedicated to living in peace and security side by side with the Jewish State of Israel. To do so, we must help Israel identify and strengthen those partners who are truly committed to peace while isolating those who seek conflict and instability, and stand with Israel against those who seek its destruction. The United States and its Quartet partners should continue to isolate Hamas until it renounces terrorism, recognizes Israel's right to exist, and abides by past agreements. Sustained American leadership for peace and security will require patient efforts and the personal commitment of the President of the United States. The creation of a Palestinian state through final status negotiations, together with an international compensation mechanism, should resolve the issue of Palestinian refugees by allowing them to settle there, rather than in Israel. All understand that it is unrealistic to expect the outcome of final status negotiations to be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949. Jerusalem is and will remain the capital of Israel. The parties have agreed that Jerusalem is a matter for final status negotiations. It should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.[254]

A January 2009 Pew Research Center study found that when asked "which side do you sympathize with more", 42% of Democrats and 33% of liberals (a plurality in both groups) sympathize most with the Israelis. Around half of all political moderates or independents sided with Israel.[255] The years leading up to the 2016 election have brought more discussion of the party's stance on Israel as polls reported declining support for Israel among the party faithful.[256] Gallup suggested that the decline in support might be due to tensions between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Barack Obama.[256]

The rise of the progressive Bernie Sanders-aligned faction of the party, which tends to trend more pro-Palestine, is also likely responsible for the decline in support for Israel. A 2016 Pew Research poll found that while Clinton supporters sympathized more with Israel than Palestinians by a 20-point margin, Sanders supporters sympathized more with Palestinians than with Israel by a 6-point margin.[257] In June 2016, DNC members voted against an amendment to the party platform proposed by Sanders supporter James Zogby calling for an "end to occupation and illegal settlements".[258] In August 2018, Rashida Tlaib, who supports a one-state solution,[259] and Ilhan Omar, who has referred to Israel as an "apartheid regime"[260] won Democratic primaries in Michigan and Minnesota. In November 2018, shortly after being elected to Congress, Omar came out in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel.[261]

Composition

By income and class

The relationship between income, class, and partisan support has changed dramatically in recent years.[262] Since the mid-2010s, affluent white voters have been more likely to vote for the Democratic Party.[42][263]

Since 1980,[264] there has been a significant decline in support for the Democratic Party among white working class voters.[265][266][267][268] Since the 2010s, similar trends have been observed among working class minority groups, particularly among those who are Hispanic.[45][44][269][47][263] Working class Democrats differ from liberals in tending to have more socially conservative views. They also tend to be more religious and more likely to belong to an ethnic minority.[40][47][262][263]

This political realignment meant that in the 2020 presidential election, Democratic-plurality voting counties composed 70% of United States GDP.[270] According to The New Yorker, by 2022 "the most affluent congressional districts in the country [were] largely represented by Democrats".[262]

Professionals

Professionals, those who have a college education and those whose work revolves around the conception of ideas, have tended to support the Democratic Party since 2000. While the professional class was once a stronghold of the Republican Party, it has become increasingly in favor of the Democratic Party. Support for Democratic candidates among professionals may be traced to the prevalence of liberal cultural values among this group:[271]

Template:Blockquote

The highly educated constitute an important part of the Democratic voter base. The party has strong support among scientists, with 55% identifying as Democrats, 32% as independents, and 6% as Republicans in a 2009 study.[272] Those with a college education have become increasingly Democratic in the 1992,[273] 1996,[273] 2000,[106] 2004,[107] and 2008[274] elections. In exit polls for the 2018 elections, 65% of those with a graduate degree said they voted Democratic, and Democrats won college graduates overall by a 20-point margin.[122]

Labor

File:Fig 109 - does someone in house belong to union.JPG
Higher percentages of Democrats than Republicans are members of union households.

Since the 1930s, a critical component of the Democratic Party coalition has been organized labor. Labor unions supply a great deal of the money, grass roots political organization, and voters for the party. Democrats are far more likely to be represented by unions, although union membership has declined in general during the last few decades. This trend is depicted in the following graph from the book Democrats and Republicans—Rhetoric and Reality.[275] It is based on surveys conducted by the National Election Studies (NES).

The three most significant labor groupings in the Democratic coalition today are the AFL–CIO and Change to Win labor federations as well as the National Education Association, a large, unaffiliated teachers' union. Important issues for labor unions include supporting industrial policy that sustains unionized manufacturing jobs, raising the minimum wage, and promoting broad social programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

In the 2020 presidential election, 57% of union households voted for Joe Biden.[21]

Younger Americans

File:Jon Ossoff Senate Portrait 2021.jpg
Elected at age 33, Jon Ossoff is currently the youngest member of the U.S. Senate.[276][277]

Younger Americans, including millennials and Generation Z, tend to vote mostly for Democratic candidates in recent years.[278]

The young have voted in favor of the Democratic presidential candidate in every election since Bill Clinton in 1992 and are more likely to identify as liberals than the general population.[279] In the 2004 presidential election, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry received 54% of the vote from voters of the age group 18–29 while Republican George W. Bush received 45%. In the 2006 midterm elections, the Democrats received 60% of the vote from the same age group.[107][108]

Polls suggest that younger Americans have more liberal views than the general public on same-sex marriage and universal health care, helping Barack Obama carry 66% of their votes in 2008. In the 2018 midterm elections, 67% of those in the 18–29 age range voted for the Democratic candidate. Democrats also won those in the 30–44 age range by a 19-point margin.[122]

Women

File:Hillary Clinton by Gage Skidmore 4 (cropped).jpg
Hillary Clinton was the first woman to be nominated for president by a major party.

Although the gender gap has varied over many years, women of all ages are more likely than men to identify as Democrats.

Since the 1990s, women have supported Democratic Party candidates to various offices at higher rates than men.[280] Polls in 2009 indicated that 41% of women identify as Democrats while only 25% of women identify as Republicans and 26% as independents whereas 32% of men identify as Democrats, 28% as Republicans and 34% as independents. Among ethnic minorities, women also are more likely than men to identify as Democrats.

The National Federation of Democratic Women is an affiliated organization meant to advocate for women's issues. National women's organizations that support Democratic candidates include EMILY's List, which aims to help elect pro-choice female Democratic candidates to office.

Of the 118 women in the United States House of Representatives at the start of the 117th Congress, there were 89 Democrats.[281] After special elections between June 2021 and September 2022, where four more female Democrats were elected as U.S. Representatives, there have been 123 women in the House, 93 of whom are Democratic.[282]

Marital status and parenthood

Americans that identify as single, living with a domestic partner, divorced, separated, or widowed are more likely to vote Democratic in contrast to married Americans who split about equally between Democrats and Republicans.[20]

General Social Surveys of more than 11,000 Democrats and Republicans conducted between 1996 and 2006 came to the result that the differences in fertility rates are not statistically significant between these parties, with the average Democrat having 1.94 children and the average Republican having 1.91 children.[283] However, there is a significant difference in fertility rates between the two related groups, liberals and conservatives, with liberals reproducing at a much lower rate than conservatives.[283]

LGBT Americans

According to exit polling, LGBT Americans typically vote Democratic in national elections within the 70–80% range. In heavily gay precincts in large cities across the nation, the average was higher, ranging from 85% to 94%. This trend has continued since 1996 when Bill Clinton won 71% of the LGBT vote compared to Bob Dole's 16%. In 2000 Al Gore won 70% to George W. Bush's 25%; in 2004 John Kerry won 77% to George W. Bush's 23%; in 2008 Barack Obama won 70% to John McCain's 27%;[284] in 2012 Barack Obama won 76% to Mitt Romney's 22%;[285] in 2016 Hillary Clinton won 78% to Donald Trump's 14%; and in 2020 Joe Biden won 73% to Donald Trump's 25%.[286] Patrick Egan, a professor at New York University specializing in LGBT voting patterns, calls this a "remarkable continuity", saying that "about three-fourths vote Democratic and one-fourth Republican from year to year".[284]

Notable LGBT Democrats include Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, Senator Kyrsten Sinema[lower-alpha 1] of Arizona, Representative David Cicilline of Rhode Island, Governor Kate Brown of Oregon, and Governor Jared Polis of Colorado. The late activist and San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk was a Democrat as is former Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts.

The Stonewall Democrats is an LGBT advocacy group associated with the Democratic Party. The Congressional LGBTQ+ Equality Caucus is a congressional caucus of 172 Democrats that advocate for LGBT rights within the House of Representatives.[287]

By winning the 2020 Iowa Democratic presidential caucuses, former Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, Pete Buttigieg became the first openly gay candidate to win a presidential primary or caucus. In December 2020, Buttigieg was selected to serve as United States Secretary of Transportation, and he became the first openly gay cabinet secretary to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate in February 2021.[288][289]

African Americans

From the end of the Civil War to the early 20th century, African Americans primarily favored the Republican Party due to its role in achieving the abolition of slavery, particularly through President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation.[290] The South had long been a Democratic stronghold, favoring a state's right to legal slavery. In addition, the ranks of the fledgling Ku Klux Klan were composed almost entirely of white Democrats who were angry over the treatment they had received at the hands of Northerners and who were also bent on reversing the policies of Reconstruction.[291]

African Americans began drifting to the Democratic Party when Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected president.[290] Support for the civil rights movement in the 1960s by Democratic presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson helped give the Democrats even greater support in the African-American community, which has consistently voted between 85% and 95% Democratic from the 1960s to the present day, making African Americans one of the biggest support groups in any US party.[290]

Prominent modern-day African-American Democratic politicians include Jim Clyburn, Maxine Waters, Barbara Lee, Charles Rangel, John Conyers, Karen Bass, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, Senator Cory Booker, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former President Barack Obama, who managed to win over 95% of the African-American vote in the 2008 election.[292] Despite not having a partisan affiliation, the NAACP often participates in organizing voter turnout drives and advocates for progressive causes, especially, those that affect people of color.[293]

Within the House of Representatives, the Congressional Black Caucus, consisting of 55 black Democrats, serves to represent the interests of African Americans and advocate on issues that affect them.[294]

Latino Americans

The Latino population, particularly the large Mexican American population in the Southwest and the large Puerto Rican and Dominican populations in the Northeast, have been strong supporters of the Democratic Party. In the 1996 presidential election, Democratic President Bill Clinton received 72% of the Latino vote.[295] In following years, the Republican Party gained increasing support from the Latino community, especially among Latino Protestants and Pentecostals. With his much more liberal views on immigration, President Bush was the first Republican president to gain 40% of the Latino vote in the 2004 presidential election. But the Republican Party's support among Hispanics eroded in the 2006 midterm elections, dropping from 44% to 30%, with the Democrats gaining in the Latino vote from 55% in 2004 to 69% in 2006.[107][108] Democrats increased their share of the Latino vote in the 2008 presidential election, with Barack Obama receiving 67%. According to exit polls by Edison Research, Obama increased his support again in 2012, winning 71% of Latino voters.[296]

Cuban Americans still tend to vote Republican, though there has been a noticeable change starting with the 2008 elections. During the 2008 elections, Barack Obama received 47% of the Cuban American vote in Florida.[297] According to Bendixen's exit polls, 84% of Miami-Dade Cuban-American voters 65 or older backed McCain, while 55% of those 29 or younger backed Obama,[298] showing that the younger Cuban-American generation has become more liberal.

Unaffiliated Latino advocacy groups that often support progressive candidates and causes include the National Council of La Raza and the League of United Latin American Citizens. In the House of Representatives, the Democratic caucus of Latino Americans is the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

In the 2018 elections, 69% of Latino Americans voted for the Democratic House candidate.[122] Since the 2020s, the party's advantage among Hispanic voters has declined.[44][45][46][299][269]

Asian Americans

The Democratic Party has supermajority support in the Asian-American population. Asian Americans had been a stronghold of the Republican Party up to and including the 1992 presidential election, in which George H. W. Bush won 55% of the Asian-American vote. Originally, the vast majority of Asian Americans were strongly anti-communist Vietnamese refugees, Chinese Americans, Taiwanese Americans, Korean Americans, and Filipino Americans, and the Republican Party's positions resonated with this demographic.

The Democratic Party made gains among Asian Americans starting in 1996 and in 2006 won 62% of the Asian-American vote. Exit polls after the 2008 presidential election indicated that Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, won 62% of the Asian-American vote.[300] In the 2012 presidential election, 73% of the Asian-American electorate voted for Obama's re-election.[301] Barack Obama had the support of 85% of Indian Americans, 68% of Chinese Americans, and 57% of Filipino Americans.[302] The Asian-American community's increasing number of young voters has also helped to erode traditionally reliably Republican voting blocs such as Vietnamese and Filipino Americans, leading to an increase in support for Democrats.

Prominent past and present Asian-American Democrats include Vice President Kamala Harris, U.S. Senators Tammy Duckworth, Daniel Inouye, Daniel Akaka, and Mazie Hirono, former Governor and Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, and U.S. Representatives Mike Honda, Judy Chu, Doris Matsui, Ro Khanna, Pramila Jayapal, Norman Mineta, and Dalip Singh Saund. Saund was the first Asian-American U.S. Representative.

In the 2018 elections, 77% of Asian Americans voted for the Democratic candidate.[122]

Native Americans

The Democratic Party also has strong support among the Native American population, particularly in Arizona, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Washington, Alaska, Idaho, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Oklahoma,[303] and North Carolina. Although now a small percentage of the population (virtually non-existent in some regions), most Native American precincts vote Democratic in margins exceeded only by African Americans.[304]

Modern-day Democratic Native American politicians include former Congressman Brad Carson of Oklahoma as well as Principal Chief Bill John Baker of the Cherokee Nation, Governor Bill Anoatubby of the Chickasaw Nation, and Chief Gary Batton of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma.

In 2018, Democrats Deb Haaland of New Mexico and Sharice Davids of Kansas became the first Native American women to be elected to Congress.[305] Democrat Peggy Flanagan was also elected in 2018 and currently serves as Lieutenant Governor of Minnesota. Flanagan is the second Native American woman to be elected to statewide executive office in U.S. history and the highest-ranking Native woman to be elected to executive office.[306]

In December 2020, Joe Biden chose Deb Haaland to serve as United States Secretary of the Interior; she became the first Native American Cabinet secretary in March 2021.

Christian Americans

Black churches, mainline Protestants, evangelicals, and Catholics contributed to Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal coalition.[307] During the New Deal era, President Roosevelt appealed to notions of Christian charity.[308] In explaining his philosophy, he said: "I am a Christian and a Democrat".[308]

Catholic Americans have traditionally been a stronghold for the Democratic Party, although they have become more divided between the two major parties in recent years. Both Catholics elected to be president, John F. Kennedy and Joe Biden, have been Democrats.[309] The most recent Democratic Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is also Catholic.[310]

In response to high white evangelical support for Donald Trump and the Republican Party,[311] Hillary Scholten, a member of the Christian Reformed Church, founded the Christian Democrats of America.[312]Template:Undue weight inline During the 2020 primaries, Christians were more likely to support Joe Biden than Bernie Sanders, who was favored among religiously unaffiliated Democrats.[313] 1,600 faith leaders (mostly mainline Protestants, evangelicals, and Catholics) supported Joe Biden's 2020 presidential bid.[314]Template:Undue weight inline Robb Ryerse, political director at Vote Common Good, a religiously motivated anti-Trump organization, estimated that there were roughly a dozen evangelical Christians running for political office as Democrats in 2020, as opposed to two or three in 2018.[312]Template:Undue weight inline

As of 2021, every Democratic president, Democratic vice president, and Democratic presidential nominee has been a Christian. According to the Pew Research Center, 78.4% of Democrats in the 116th United States Congress were Christian.[315]

Religious minorities

Secular Americans

The Democratic Party receives support from secular organizations such as the Secular Coalition for America[316] and many agnostic and atheist Americans. Exit polls from the 2008 election showed that voters with a religious affiliation of "none" accounted for the 12% of the electorate and voted for Democratic candidate Barack Obama by a 75–25% margin.[317] In his first inaugural address, Obama acknowledged atheists by saying that the United States is not just "Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus but non-believers as well".[318] In the 2012 election cycle, Democratic president Barack Obama, who was running for re-election, had moderate to high ratings with the Secular Coalition for America while the majority of the Republican candidates had ratings in the low-to-failing range.[319]

In the 2020 United States presidential election, exit polls show that voters with no religious affiliation accounted for 22% of the electorate and voted for Biden by a 65–31% margin.[320]

Jewish Americans

Jewish American communities tend to be a stronghold for the Democratic Party. Al Gore received 79% of the Jewish votes in 2000, and Barack Obama won about 77% of the Jewish vote in 2008.[321] In the 2018 House of Representatives elections, 79% of Jewish Americans voted for the Democratic candidate.[122]

Jewish Americans as an important Democratic constituency are especially politically active and influential in large cities such as New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, and Chicago and play critical roles in large cities within presidential swing states, such as Philadelphia, Miami, and Las Vegas. Many prominent national Democrats in recent decades have been Jewish, including Chuck Schumer, Carl Levin, Abraham Ribicoff, Ben Cardin, Henry Waxman, Joseph Lieberman, Bernie Sanders, Dianne Feinstein, Barney Frank, Barbara Boxer, Paul Wellstone, Rahm Emanuel, Russ Feingold, Herb Kohl, and Howard Metzenbaum.[322]

Arab and Muslim Americans

Arab Americans and Muslim Americans have leaned Democratic since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[323] Zogby found in June 2007 that 39% of Arab Americans identify as Democrats, 26% as Republicans, and 28% as independents.[323] Arab Americans, who are in general socially conservative but have more diverse economic views, historically voted Republican until recent years, having supported Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore in 2000.[324] A 2012 poll found that 68% of Muslim Americans surveyed supported Democratic president Barack Obama.[325] A 2017 Pew Research Center report found that a majority (66%) of American Muslims identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, receiving consistent support from 63% in 2007 to 70% in 2011.[326]

The first Arab American in the U.S. House of Representatives, Californian George A. Kasem, and the first Arab American in the U.S. Senate, South Dakotan James Abourezk, were both Democrats.[327]

Democratic presidents

As of 2021, there have been a total of 16 Democratic Party presidents.

# Name Portrait State Presidency
start date
Presidency
end date
Time in office
7 Andrew Jackson (1767–1845) 65px Tennessee March 4, 1829 March 4, 1837 Template:Ayd
8 Martin Van Buren (1782–1862) 65px New York March 4, 1837 March 4, 1841 Template:Ayd
11 James K. Polk (1795–1849) 65px Tennessee March 4, 1845 March 4, 1849 Template:Ayd
14 Franklin Pierce (1804–1869) 65px New Hampshire March 4, 1853 March 4, 1857 Template:Ayd
15 James Buchanan (1791–1868) 65px Pennsylvania March 4, 1857 March 4, 1861 Template:Ayd
17 Andrew Johnson (1808–1875) 65px Tennessee April 15, 1865[note 2] March 4, 1869 Template:Ayd
22 Grover Cleveland (1837–1908) 65px New York March 4, 1885 March 4, 1889 Template:Ayd
24 March 4, 1893 March 4, 1897
28 Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924) 65px New Jersey March 4, 1913 March 4, 1921 Template:Ayd
32 Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882–1945) 65px New York March 4, 1933 April 12, 1945[lower-alpha 2] Template:Ayd
33 Harry S. Truman (1884–1972) 65px Missouri April 12, 1945 January 20, 1953 Template:Ayd
35 John F. Kennedy (1917–1963) 65px Massachusetts January 20, 1961 November 22, 1963[lower-alpha 2] Template:Ayd
36 Lyndon B. Johnson (1908–1973) 65px Texas November 22, 1963 January 20, 1969 Template:Ayd
39 Jimmy Carter (born 1924) 65px Georgia January 20, 1977 January 20, 1981 Template:Ayd
42 Bill Clinton (born 1946) 65px Arkansas January 20, 1993 January 20, 2001 Template:Ayd
44 Barack Obama (born 1961) 88x88px Illinois January 20, 2009 January 20, 2017 Template:Ayd
46 Joe Biden (born 1942) 65px Delaware January 20, 2021 Incumbent Template:Ayd

Current Supreme Court justices appointed by Democratic presidents

As of July 2022, three of the nine seats on the Supreme Court of the United States are filled by Justices appointed by Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Portrait Justice Senate Vote Since President
125x125px Sonia Sotomayor

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

68–31 August 8, 2009 Barack Obama
124x124px Elena Kagan

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

63–37 August 7, 2010
125x125px Ketanji Brown Jackson

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

53–47 June 30, 2022 Joe Biden

Recent electoral history

In congressional elections: 1950–present

House of Representatives President Senate
Election

year

No. of

seats won

+/– No. of

seats won

+/– Election

year

1950 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 28 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Harry S. Truman Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 5 1950
1952 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 22 rowspan="4" Template:Party shading/Republican |Dwight D. Eisenhower Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 2 1952
1954 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 19 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 1954
1956 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Steady 0 1956
1958 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 49 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 15 1958
1960 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 21 rowspan="2" Template:Party shading/Democratic |John F. Kennedy Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 1 1960
1962 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 4 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 3 1962
1964 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 37 rowspan="2" Template:Party shading/Democratic |Lyndon B. Johnson Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 1964
1966 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 47 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 3 1966
1968 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 5 rowspan="3" Template:Party shading/Republican |Richard Nixon Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 5 1968
1970 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 12 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 3 1970
1972 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 13 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 1972
1974 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 49 Template:Party shading/Republican |Gerald Ford Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 4 1974
1976 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 1 rowspan="2" Template:Party shading/Democratic |Jimmy Carter Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Steady 0 1976
1978 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 15 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 3 1978
1980 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 34 rowspan="4" Template:Party shading/Republican |Ronald Reagan Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 12 1980
1982 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 26 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 1 1982
1984 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 16 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 1984
1986 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 5 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 8 1986
1988 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 rowspan="2" Template:Party shading/Republican |George H. W. Bush Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 1 1988
1990 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 7 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 1 1990
1992 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 9 rowspan="4" Template:Party shading/Democratic |Bill Clinton Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 1 1992
1994 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 54 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 10 1994
1996 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 2 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 2 1996
1998 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 5 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Steady 0 1998
2000 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 1 rowspan="4" Template:Party shading/Republican |George W. Bush Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 5 2000[lower-alpha 3]
2002 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 7 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 2 2002
2004 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 2 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 4 2004
2006 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 31 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 6[lower-alpha 4] 2006
2008 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 21 rowspan="4" Template:Party shading/Democratic |Barack Obama Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 8[lower-alpha 4] 2008
2010 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 63 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 6[lower-alpha 4] 2010
2012 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 8 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 2[lower-alpha 4] 2012
2014 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 13 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 9[lower-alpha 4] 2014
2016 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 6 rowspan="2" Template:Party shading/Republican |Donald Trump Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Increase 2[lower-alpha 4] 2016
2018 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 41 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 1[lower-alpha 4] 2018
2020 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 13 rowspan="2" Template:Party shading/Democratic |Joe Biden Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 3[lower-alpha 4] 2020[lower-alpha 5]
2022 Template:Party shading/Republican |Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease 9 Template:Party shading/Democratic |Template:Composition bar Increase 1[lower-alpha 4] 2022

In presidential elections: 1828–present

Election
year
Presidential ticket Votes Vote % Electoral votes +/– Result
1828 Andrew Jackson/John C. Calhoun 642,553 56.0 Template:Composition bar Increase178
1832 Andrew Jackson/Martin Van Buren 701,780 54.2 Template:Composition bar Increase41
1836 Martin Van Buren/Richard Mentor Johnson 764,176 50.8 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease49
1840 Martin Van Buren/None[note 3] 1,128,854 46.8 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease110 Template:Lost
1844 James K. Polk/George M. Dallas 1,339,494 49.5 Template:Composition bar Increase110
1848 Lewis Cass/William O. Butler 1,223,460 42.5 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease43 Template:Lost
1852 Franklin Pierce/William R. King 1,607,510 50.8 Template:Composition bar Increase127
1856 James Buchanan/John C. Breckinridge 1,836,072 45.3 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease80
1860 Stephen A. Douglas/Herschel V. Johnson 1,380,202 29.5 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease162 Template:Lost
1864 George B. McClellan/George H. Pendleton 1,812,807 45.0 Template:Composition bar Increase9 Template:Lost
1868 Horatio Seymour/Francis Preston Blair Jr. 2,706,829 47.3 Template:Composition bar Increase59 Template:Lost
1872 Horace Greeley/Benjamin G. Brown (Liberal Republican) 2,834,761 43.8 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease11 Template:Lost
1876 Samuel J. Tilden/Thomas A. Hendricks 4,288,546 50.9 Template:Composition bar Increase115 Template:Lost[upper-alpha 1]
1880 Winfield Scott Hancock/William H. English 4,444,260 48.2 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease29 Template:Lost
1884 Grover Cleveland/Thomas A. Hendricks 4,914,482 48.9 Template:Composition bar Increase64
1888 Grover Cleveland/Allen G. Thurman 5,534,488 48.6 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease51 Template:Lost[upper-alpha 2]
1892 Grover Cleveland/Adlai Stevenson I 5,556,918 46.0 Template:Composition bar Increase109
1896 William Jennings Bryan/Arthur Sewall 6,509,052 46.7 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease101 Template:Lost
1900 William Jennings Bryan/Adlai Stevenson I 6,370,932 45.5 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease21 Template:Lost
1904 Alton B. Parker/Henry G. Davis 5,083,880 37.6 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease15 Template:Lost
1908 William Jennings Bryan/John W. Kern 6,408,984 43.0 Template:Composition bar Increase22 Template:Lost
1912 Woodrow Wilson/Thomas R. Marshall 6,296,284 41.8 Template:Composition bar Increase273
1916 Woodrow Wilson/Thomas R. Marshall 9,126,868 49.2 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease158
1920 James M. Cox/Franklin D. Roosevelt 9,139,661 34.2 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease150 Template:Lost
1924 John W. Davis/Charles W. Bryan 8,386,242 28.8 Template:Composition bar Increase9 Template:Lost
1928 Al Smith/Joseph T. Robinson 15,015,464 40.8 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease49 Template:Lost
1932 Franklin D. Roosevelt/John Nance Garner 22,821,277 57.4 Template:Composition bar Increase385
1936 Franklin D. Roosevelt/John Nance Garner 27,747,636 60.8 Template:Composition bar Increase51
1940 Franklin D. Roosevelt/Henry A. Wallace 27,313,945 54.7 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease74
1944 Franklin D. Roosevelt/Harry S. Truman 25,612,916 53.4 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease17
1948 Harry S. Truman/Alben W. Barkley 24,179,347 49.6 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease129
1952 Adlai Stevenson II/John Sparkman 27,375,090 44.3 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease214 Template:Lost
1956 Adlai Stevenson II/Estes Kefauver 26,028,028 42.0 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease16 Template:Lost
1960 John F. Kennedy/Lyndon B. Johnson 34,220,984 49.7 Template:Composition bar Increase230
1964 Lyndon B. Johnson/Hubert Humphrey 43,127,041 61.1 Template:Composition bar Increase183
1968 Hubert Humphrey/Edmund Muskie 31,271,839 42.7 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease295 Template:Lost
1972 George McGovern/Sargent Shriver 29,173,222 37.5 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease174 Template:Lost
1976 Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale 40,831,881 50.1 Template:Composition bar Increase280
1980 Jimmy Carter/Walter Mondale 35,480,115 41.0 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease248 Template:Lost
1984 Walter Mondale/Geraldine Ferraro 37,577,352 40.6 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease36 Template:Lost
1988 Michael Dukakis/Lloyd Bentsen 41,809,074 45.6 Template:Composition bar Increase98 Template:Lost
1992 Bill Clinton/Al Gore 44,909,806 43.0 Template:Composition bar Increase259
1996 Bill Clinton/Al Gore 47,401,185 49.2 Template:Composition bar Increase9
2000 Al Gore/Joe Lieberman 50,999,897 48.4 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease113 Template:Lost[upper-alpha 3]
2004 John Kerry/John Edwards 59,028,444 48.3 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease15 Template:Lost
2008 Barack Obama/Joe Biden 69,498,516 52.9 Template:Composition bar Increase114
2012 Barack Obama/Joe Biden 65,915,795 51.1 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease33
2016 Hillary Clinton/Tim Kaine 65,853,514 48.2 Template:Composition bar Template:Decrease105 Template:Lost[upper-alpha 4]
2020 Joe Biden/Kamala Harris 81,268,924 51.3 Template:Composition bar Increase79

See also

Notes

  1. Senator Kyrsten Sinema was elected as a Democrat in 2018, but registered as an Independent in December 2022.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Died in office.
  3. Republican Vice President Dick Cheney provided a tie-breaking vote, giving Republicans a majority until June 6, 2001, when Jim Jeffords left Republicans to join the Democratic Caucus.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Includes Independents caucusing with the Democrats.
  5. Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris provided a tie-breaking vote, giving Democrats a majority throughout the 117th Congress.
  1. Although Tilden won a majority of the popular vote, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes won a majority of votes in the Electoral College.
  2. Although Cleveland won a plurality of the popular vote, Republican Benjamin Harrison won a majority of votes in the Electoral College.
  3. Although Gore won a plurality of the popular vote, Republican George W. Bush won a majority of votes in the Electoral College.
  4. Although Clinton won a plurality of the popular vote, Republican Donald Trump won a majority of votes in the Electoral College.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 M. Philip Lucas, "Martin Van Buren as Party Leader and at Andrew Jackson's Right Hand." in A Companion to the Antebellum Presidents 1837–1861 (2014): 107–129.
  2. 2.0 2.1 "The Democratic Party, founded in 1828, is the world's oldest political party" states Janda, Kenneth; Berry, Jeffrey M.; Goldman, Jerry (2010). The Challenge of Democracy: American Government in Global Politics. Cengage Learning. p. 276. ISBN 9780495906186. https://archive.org/details/jandachallengeof00houg. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Michael Kazin, What It Took to Win: A History of the Democratic Party (2022) pp 5, 12.
  4. Adams, Ian (2001). Political Ideology Today (reprinted, revised ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 32-33. ISBN 9780719060205. https://books.google.com/books?id=apstK1qIvvMC&pg=PA32. "Ideologically, all US parties are liberal and always have been. Essentially they espouse classical liberalism, that is a form of democratised Whig constitutionalism plus the free market. The point of difference comes with the influence of social liberalism" and the proper role of government... ...the American right has nothing to do with maintaining the traditional social order, as in Europe. What it believes in is... individualism... The American right has tended towards... classical liberalism..." 
  5. Herndon, Astead W. (2021-02-21). "Democrats' Big Tent Helped Them Win. Now It Threatens Biden's Agenda." (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/21/us/politics/biden-agenda-democrats.html. 
  6. Adams, Ian (2001). Political Ideology Today (reprinted, revised ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 32-33. ISBN 9780719060205. https://books.google.com/books?id=apstK1qIvvMC&pg=PA32. "Ideologically, all US parties are liberal and always have been. Essentially they espouse classical liberalism, that is a form of democratised Whig constitutionalism plus the free market. The point of difference comes with the influence of social liberalism" and the proper role of government... ...the American right has nothing to do with maintaining the traditional social order, as in Europe. What it believes in is... individualism... The American right has tended towards... classical liberalism..." 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Arnold, N. Scott (2009). Imposing values: an essay on liberalism and regulation. Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 9780495501121. https://books.google.com/books?id=xGNRRwkZFysC. Retrieved April 28, 2020. "Modern liberalism occupies the left-of-center in the traditional political spectrum and is represented by the Democratic Party in the United States." 
  8. Knoll, Benjamin (June 29, 2012). "President Obama, the Democratic Party, and Socialism: A Political Science Perspective". The Huffington Post. https://huffingtonpost.com/benjamin-knoll/obama-romney-economy_b_1615862.html. 
  9. "Major American Political Parties of the 19th Century" (in en). Oct 2, 2017. https://online.norwich.edu/academic-programs/resources/major-american-political-parties-of-the-19th-century. "...The Democratic-Republican and Whig parties are considered the predecessors of today's Democratic and Republican parties, respectively." 
  10. 10.0 10.1 The party has claimed a founding date of 1792 as noted in S.2047 which passed in the United States Senate in 1991. 102nd Congress (1991), S.2047 – A bill to establish a commission to commemorate the bicentennial of the establishment of the Democratic Party of the United States., https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/senate-bill/2047/text?r=90&s=1  “[I]n 1992, the Democratic Party of the United States will celebrate the 200th anniversary of its establishment on May 13, 1792.”
  11. 11.0 11.1 Holt, Michael F. (1992). Political Parties and American Political Development: From the Age of Jackson to the Age of Lincoln. Louisiana State University Press. pp. 27–28. ISBN 978-0807126097. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Political_Parties_and_American_Political/VEhYhbouR3QC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA27&printsec=frontcover. 
  12. 12.0 12.1 Bates, Christopher (2015). The Early Republic and Antebellum America: An Encyclopedia of Social, Political, Cultural, and Economic History. Taylor & Francis. pp. 293. ISBN 9781317457404. "The expansion engineered by Polk rendered the Democratic Party increasingly beholden to Southern slave interests, which dominated the party from 1848 to the Civil War." 
  13. 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Staff. "Jacksonian Democracy: The Democratization of Politics". https://www.britannica.com/place/United-States/Jacksonian-democracy. "By the 1840s, Whig and Democratic congressmen voted as rival blocs. Whigs supported and Democrats opposed a weak executive, a new Bank of the United States, a high tariff, distribution of land revenues to the states, relief legislation to mitigate the effects of the depression, and federal reapportionment of House seats. Whigs voted against and Democrats approved an independent treasury, an aggressive foreign policy, and expansionism. These were important issues, capable of dividing the electorate just as they divided the major parties in Congress." 
  14. Geer, John G. (1992). "New Deal Issues and the American Electorate, 1952-1988". Political Behavior 14 (1): 45–65. doi:10.1007/BF00993508. ISSN 0190-9320. JSTOR 586295. https://www.jstor.org/stable/586295. 
  15. Grigsby, Ellen (2008). Analyzing Politics: An Introduction to Political Science. Cengage Learning. pp. 106–107. ISBN 9780495501121. https://books.google.com/books?id=xGNRRwkZFysC. Retrieved April 28, 2020. "In the United States, the Democratic Party represents itself as the liberal alternative to the Republicans, but its liberalism is for the most part the later version of liberalism—modern liberalism." 
  16. Prendergast, William B. (1999). The Catholic Voter in American Politics: The Passing of the Democratic Monolith. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University. ISBN 978-0-87840-724-8. https://books.google.com/books?id=B9nFwo5B1BQC. 
  17. Marlin, George J. (2004). The American Catholic Voter: 200 Years of Political Impact. South Bend, Indiana: St. Augustine. ISBN 978-1-58731-029-4. https://archive.org/details/americancatholic0000marl_2006. Retrieved April 28, 2020. 
  18. Michael Corbett et al. Politics and Religion in the United States (2nd ed. 2013).
  19. 20.0 20.1 "Women More Likely to Be Democrats, Regardless of Age". Gallup.com. June 12, 2009. http://www.gallup.com/poll/120839/Women-Likely-Democrats-Regardless-Age.aspx. 
  20. 21.0 21.1 Kullgren, Ian (November 10, 2020). "Union Workers Weren't a Lock for Biden. Here's Why That Matters" (in en). https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/union-workers-werent-a-lock-for-biden-heres-why-that-matters. 
  21. Frank, Thomas (2016). Listen, liberal, or, What ever happened to the party of the people? (First ed.). New York. ISBN 978-1-62779-539-5. OCLC 908628802. https://archive.org/details/listenliberalorw0000fran. 
  22. 23.0 23.1 Hale, Jon F. (1995). "The Making of the New Democrats". Political Science Quarterly 110 (2): 207–232. doi:10.2307/2152360. ISSN 0032-3195. JSTOR 2152360. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2152360. 
  23. 24.0 24.1 Wills, Garry (1997-01-19). "The Clinton Principle" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/01/19/magazine/the-clinton-principle.html. 
  24. Edsall, Thomas B. (1998-06-28). "Clinton and Blair envision a 'Third Way' international movement" (in en-US). Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1998/06/28/clinton-and-blair-envision-a-third-way-international-movement/0bc00486-bd6d-4da4-a970-5255d7aa25d8/. 
  25. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Larry E. Sullivan. The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences (2009). p. 291: "This liberalism favors a generous welfare state and a greater measure of social and economic equality. Liberty thus exists when all citizens have access to basic necessities such as education, healthcare, and economic opportunities."
  26. "Preventing Gun Violence". Democrats.org. https://democrats.org/issues/preventing-gun-violence/. 
  27. "Democratic Party on Abortion". OnTheIssues.org. https://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Abortion.htm. 
  28. Green, Erica L.; Apuzzo, Matt; Benner, Katie (2018-07-03). "Trump Officials Reverse Obama's Policy on Affirmative Action in Schools" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/03/us/politics/trump-affirmative-action-race-schools.html. 
  29. 30.0 30.1 "Democratic Platform Endorses Gay Marriage". All Things Considered. Npr.org. September 4, 2012. https://www.npr.org/2012/09/04/160562404/democratic-platform-endorses-gay-marriage. 
  30. "Protecting Communities And Building Trust By Reforming Our Criminal Justice System". Democratic Party. https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/protecting-communities-and-building-trust-by-reforming-our-criminal-justice-system/. 
  31. Chammah, Maurice (July 18, 2016). "Two Parties, Two Platforms on Criminal Justice". The Marshall Project. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2016/07/18/two-parties-two-platforms-on-criminal-justice. 
  32. Gurley, Gabrielle (2020-11-23). "Biden at the Cannabis Crossroads" (in en-us). https://prospect.org/api/content/1ee9a272-2b7f-11eb-b7ea-1244d5f7c7c6/. 
  33. Goodnough, Abby; Kaplan, Thomas (June 28, 2019). "Democrat vs. Democrat: How Health Care Is Dividing the Party". https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/28/health/democratic-debate-healthcare.html. 
  34. Levy, Jonah (2006). The State after Statism: New State Activities in the Age of Liberalization. Harvard University Press. p. 198. ISBN 9780495501121. https://books.google.com/books?id=xGNRRwkZFysC. "In the corporate governance area, the center-left repositioned itself to press for reform. The Democratic Party in the United States used the postbubble scandals and the collapse of share prices to attack the Republican Party ... Corporate governance reform fit surprisingly well within the contours of the center-left ideology. The Democratic Party and the SPD have both been committed to the development of the regulatory state as a counterweight to managerial authority, corporate power, and market failure." 
  35. U.S. Department of State. "A Mixed Economy: The Role of the Market". About.com. http://economics.about.com/od/howtheuseconomyworks/a/mixed_economy.htm. 
  36. 37.0 37.1 Zengerle, Jason; Metz, Justin (2022-06-29). "The Vanishing Moderate Democrat" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/29/magazine/moderate-democrat.html. "Over the last decade, the Democratic Party has moved significantly to the left on almost every salient political issue ... on social, cultural and religious issues, particularly those related to criminal justice, race, abortion and gender identity, the Democrats have taken up ideological stances that many of the college-educated voters who now make up a sizable portion of the party's base cheer ... ." 
  37. Zacher, Sam (2023-02-08). "Polarization of the Rich: The New Democratic Allegiance of Affluent Americans and the Politics of Redistribution" (in en). Perspectives on Politics: 1–19. doi:10.1017/S1537592722003310. ISSN 1537-5927. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/polarization-of-the-rich-the-new-democratic-allegiance-of-affluent-americans-and-the-politics-of-redistribution/E18D7DAE3A1EF35BA5BC54DE799F291B. "In this paper, I show that affluent and even very affluent voters—measured by income, but also stock ownership and occupation—have left the Republican Party to join the Democrats in a decades-long process...". 
  38. Goldberg, Zach (2023-01-31). "The Rise of College-Educated Democrats" (in en). https://www.manhattan-institute.org/rise-of-college-educated-democrats. 
  39. 40.0 40.1 Munis, Kal; Jacobs, Nicholas (October 20, 2022). "Why Resentful Rural Americans Vote Republican". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/20/midterms-rural-urban-divide-resentment/. "...that the disproportionately White, older, more religious, less affluent and less highly educated voters who live in rural areas are more likely to hold socially conservative views generally championed by Republicans. Meanwhile, urban areas are filled with younger, more racially diverse, more highly educated and more affluent people who hold the more socially liberal views generally championed by Democrats." 
  40. Edsall, Thomas (2023-02-01). "How Much Longer Can 'Vote Blue No Matter Who!' Last?" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/01/opinion/democratic-party-coalition.html. 
  41. 42.0 42.1 42.2 Levitz, Eric (2022-10-19). "How the Diploma Divide Is Remaking American Politics" (in en-us). https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2022/10/education-polarization-diploma-divide-democratic-party-working-class.html. "Blue America is an increasingly wealthy and well-educated place. Throughout the second half of the 20th century, Americans without college degrees were more likely than university graduates to vote Democratic. But that gap began narrowing in the late 1960s before finally flipping in 2004... A more educated Democratic coalition is, naturally, a more affluent one... In every presidential election from 1948 to 2012, white voters in the top 5 percent of America's income distribution were more Republican than those in the bottom 95 percent. Now, the opposite is true: Among America's white majority, the rich voted to the left of the middle class and the poor in 2016 and 2020, while the poor voted to the right of the middle class and the rich." 
  42. Teixeira, Ruy (2022-11-06). "Democrats' Long Goodbye to the Working Class" (in en). https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/11/democrats-long-goodbye-to-the-working-class/672016/. "As we move into the endgame of the 2022 election, the Democrats face a familiar problem. America’s historical party of the working class keeps losing working-class support. And not just among white voters. Not only has the emerging Democratic majority I once predicted failed to materialize, but many of the nonwhite voters who were supposed to deliver it are instead voting for Republicans... From 2012 to 2020, the Democrats not only saw their support among white working-class voters — those without college degrees — crater, they also saw their advantage among nonwhite working-class voters fall by 18 points. And between 2016 and 2020 alone, the Democratic advantage among Hispanic voters declined by 16 points, overwhelmingly driven by the defection of working-class voters. In contrast, Democrats' advantage among white college-educated voters improved by 16 points from 2012 to 2020, an edge that delivered Joe Biden the White House." 
  43. 44.0 44.1 44.2 Alberta, Tim (2022-11-03). "Why Democrats Are Losing Hispanic Voters" (in en). https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2022/11/hispanic-voters-fleeing-democratic-party/671851/. "Indeed, this is what makes the implications of a Hispanic partisan realignment so profound: At a moment when Democrats have begun to dominate the affluent, college-educated vote that for decades formed the cornerstone of the Republican coalition, perhaps the only thing that can keep the GOP competitive is an infusion of support from the very middle- and working-class Hispanics who were, at this moment in history, supposed to deliver the Democrats a foolproof majority." 
  44. 45.0 45.1 45.2 Ackley, Kate (November 2, 2022). "Midterms' final stretch marked by fights in unexpected places" (in en). https://www.rollcall.com/2022/11/02/midterms-final-stretch-marked-by-fights-in-unexpected-places/. "Democrats have gained support among more college-educated and affluent voters, as Republicans have made inroads with working-class voters, including minority voters. And House Republicans may expand their number of members who are Black, Hispanic, and Asian American, as the party has more minority House candidates... than in any previous cycle." 
  45. 46.0 46.1 Teixeira, Ruy (2022-11-06). "Democrats' Long Goodbye to the Working Class" (in en). https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/11/democrats-long-goodbye-to-the-working-class/672016/. "From 2012 to 2020, the Democrats not only saw their support among white working-class voters — those without college degrees — crater, they also saw their advantage among nonwhite working-class voters fall by 18 points. And between 2016 and 2020 alone, the Democratic advantage among Hispanic voters declined by 16 points, overwhelmingly driven by the defection of working-class voters. In contrast, Democrats' advantage among white college-educated voters improved by 16 points from 2012 to 2020, an edge that delivered Joe Biden the White House." 
  46. 47.0 47.1 47.2 Cohn, Nate (2022-07-13). "Poll Shows Tight Race for Control of Congress as Class Divide Widens" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/upshot/poll-2022-midterms-congress.html. "But the cofluence of economic problems and resurgent cultural issues has helped turn the emerging class divide in the Democratic coalition into a chasm, as Republicans appear to be making new inroads among nonwhite and working class voters... For the first time in a Times/Siena national survey, Democrats had a larger share of support among white college graduates than among nonwhite voters - a striking indication of the shifting balance of political energy..." 
  47. Larson, Edward (2007). A Magnificent Catastrophe: The Tumultuous Election of 1800, America's First Presidential Campaign. Free Press. pp. 21. ISBN 9780743293167. "The divisions between Adams and Jefferson were exasperated by the more extreme views expressed by some of their partisans, particularly the High Federalists led by Hamilton on what was becoming known as the political right, and the democratic wing of the Republican Party on the left, associated with New York Governor George Clinton and Pennsylvania legislator Albert Gallatin, among others." 
  48. Arthur Paulson, Realignment and Party Revival: Understanding American Electoral Politics at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century (2000) pp. 46–72.
  49. James Roger Sharp, American Politics in the Early Republic: The New Nation in Crisis (1993).
  50. Galbraith Schlisinger, Of the People: The 200 Year History of the Democratic Party (1992) ch. 1–3.
  51. Robert Allen Rutland, The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton (U. of Missouri Press, 1995) ch. 1–4.
  52. Jean H. Baker, Affairs of Party: Political Culture of Northern Democrats in the Mid-nineteenth Century (1983)
  53. David M. Potter. The Impending Crisis, 1848–1861 (1976). ch. 16.
  54. Mark E. Neely. Lincoln and the Democrats: The Politics of Opposition in the Civil War (2017).
  55. Rutland, The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton (1995) ch. 5–6.
  56. Robert W. Cherny, A Righteous Cause: The Life of William Jennings Bryan (1994)
  57. H.W. Brands, Woodrow Wilson (2003).
  58. Douglas B. Craig, After Wilson: The Struggle for the Democratic Party, 1920–1934 (1993)
  59. Ellen Russell (2007). New Deal Banking Reforms and Keynesian Welfare State Capitalism. Routledge. pp. 3–4. ISBN 9781135910655. https://books.google.com/books?id=qzOUAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA4. Retrieved April 28, 2020. 
  60. Rutland, The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton (1995) ch. 7.
  61. David M. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929–1945 (2001).
  62. Paul Finkelman and Peter Wallenstein, eds. The Encyclopedia Of American Political History (CQ Press, 2001) pp. 124–126.
  63. "Race, Campaign Politics, and the Realignment in the South". https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300077230/race-campaign-politics-and-realignment-south. 
  64. Bullock, Charles S.; Hoffman, Donna R.; Gaddie, Ronald Keith (2006). "Regional Variations in the Realignment of American Politics, 1944–2004". Social Science Quarterly 87 (3): 494–518. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00393.x. ISSN 0038-4941. "The events of 1964 laid open the divisions between the South and national Democrats and elicited distinctly different voter behavior in the two regions. The agitation for civil rights by southern blacks continued white violence toward the civil rights movement, and President Lyndon Johnson's aggressive leadership all facilitated passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. ... In the South, 1964 should be associated with GOP growth while in the Northeast this election contributed to the eradication of Republicans.". 
  65. Gaddie, Ronald Keith (February 17, 2012). "Realignment". Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381948.013.0013. http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381948.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195381948-e-13. Retrieved June 9, 2018. 
  66. Stanley, Harold W. (1988). "Southern Partisan Changes: Dealignment, Realignment or Both?". The Journal of Politics 50 (1): 64–88. doi:10.2307/2131041. ISSN 0022-3816. JSTOR 2131041. "Events surrounding the presidential election of 1964 marked a watershed in terms of the parties and the South (Pomper, 1972). The Solid South was built around the identification of the Democratic party with the cause of white supremacy. Events before 1964 gave white southerners pause about the linkage between the Democratic Party and white supremacy, but the 1964 election, passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 altered in the minds of most the positions of the national parties on racial issues.". 
  67. Miller, Gary; Schofield, Norman (2008). "The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S.". Perspectives on Politics 6 (3): 433–50. doi:10.1017/S1537592708081218. ISSN 1541-0986. "1964 was the last presidential election in which the Democrats earned more than 50 percent of the white vote in the United States.". 
  68. "The Rise of Southern Republicans – Earl Black, Merle Black". Harvard University Press. http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674012486. "When the Republican party nominated Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater—one of the few senators who had opposed the Civil Rights Act—as their presidential candidate in 1964, the party attracted many southern whites but permanently alienated African-American voters. Beginning with the Goldwater-versus-Johnson campaign more southern whites voted Republican than Democratic, a pattern that has recurred in every subsequent presidential election. ... Before the 1964 presidential election the Republican party had not carried any Deep South state for eighty-eight years. Yet shortly after Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, hundreds of Deep South counties gave Barry Goldwater landslide majorities." 
  69. 71.0 71.1 Issue Evolution. Princeton University Press. September 6, 1990. ISBN 9780691023311. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/4385.html. Retrieved June 9, 2018. 
  70. Miller, Gary; Schofield, Norman (2003). "Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States". American Political Science Review 97 (2): 245–60. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000650. ISSN 1537-5943. "By 2000, however, the New Deal party alignment no longer captured patterns of partisan voting. In the intervening 40 years, the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts had triggered an increasingly race-driven distinction between the parties. ... Goldwater won the electoral votes of five states of the Deep South in 1964, four of the states that had voted Democratic for 84 years (Califano 1991, 55). He forged a new identification of the Republican party with racial conservatism, reversing a century-long association of the GOP with racial liberalism. This, in turn, opened the door for Nixon's "Southern strategy" and the Reagan victories of the eighties.". 
  71. Valentino, Nicholas A.; Sears, David O. (2005). "Old Times There Are Not Forgotten: Race and Partisan Realignment in the Contemporary South". American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 672–88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00136.x. ISSN 0092-5853. 
  72. Kuziemko, Ilyana; Washington, Ebonya (2018). "Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate". American Economic Review 108 (10): 2830–2867. doi:10.1257/aer.20161413. ISSN 0002-8282. 
  73. James T. Patterson, Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945–1974 (1997).
  74. Patterson, Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945–1974 (1997).
  75. Smyth, David J.; Taylor, Susan Washburn (1992). "Why Do the Republicans Win the White House More Often than the Democrats?". Presidential Studies Quarterly 22 (3): 481–491. ISSN 0360-4918. JSTOR 27550992. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27550992. 
  76. Jr, R. W. Apple (1992-07-12). "Donkey's Years; Is There Room At the Top For Democrats?" (in en-US). The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/07/12/weekinreview/donkey-s-years-is-there-room-at-the-top-for-democrats.html. 
  77. James T. Patterson, Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush v. Gore (2011).
  78. 80.0 80.1 Geismer, Lily (2019-06-11). "Democrats and neoliberalism" (in en). https://www.vox.com/polyarchy/2019/6/11/18660240/democrats-neoliberalism. "The version of neoliberalism embedded in these policies understood a distinct role for government to stimulate market-oriented solutions to address social ills such as unemployment and poverty. It thereby aimed not to eradicate the welfare state but rather to reformulate it. It extended the importance of poverty alleviation, which had long served as a benchmark of liberal policy, and had many similarities with the basic ideas of the war on poverty." 
  79. Patterson. Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush v. Gore (2011).
  80. Rutland, The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton (1995) ch 8
  81. York, David Smith Molly Redden in New (2016-04-01). "Donald Trump's abortion remarks provoke biggest crisis of his campaign" (in en-GB). The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/31/donald-trump-abortion-remarks-biggest-campaign-crisis. 
  82. McCormick, Stephanie Armour and John (2020-03-14). "Democrats Sharpen Criticism of Trump's Health-Care Policy in Coronavirus Pandemic" (in en-US). The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. https://www.wsj.com/articles/democrats-sharpen-criticism-of-trumps-health-care-policy-in-coronavirus-pandemic-11584195089. 
  83. "Trump WHO decision draws criticism from Democrats in US Congress". https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/trump-decision-draws-criticism-democrats-congress-200415184644345.html. 
  84. "Biden defeats Trump for White House, says 'time to heal'". 2020-11-07. https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-wins-white-house-ap-fd58df73aa677acb74fce2a69adb71f9. 
  85. Martin, Jonathan; Fausset, Richard; Epstein, Reid J. (January 6, 2021). "Georgia Highlights: Democrats Win the Senate as Ossoff Defeats Perdue". https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/01/06/us/georgia-election-results. 
  86. "U.S. House Election Results" (in en-US). The New York Times. November 3, 2020. ISSN 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-house.html. 
  87. Wells, Joey Garrison and Dylan. "Sen. Kyrsten Sinema backs Inflation Reduction Act, giving Biden the votes for Senate passage" (in en-US). https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/08/04/krysten-sinema-inflation-reduction-act-senator-democrats-vote/10234906002/. 
  88. "What The Climate Package Means For A Warming Planet : Consider This from NPR" (in en). NPR.org. https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117017336/what-the-climate-package-means-for-a-warming-planet. 
  89. Appleby, Joyce (2003). Thomas Jefferson. p. 4. ISBN 978-0-521-64841-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=6rOu3WYEiiQC. Retrieved April 28, 2020. 
  90. "Democratic Party". Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/157244/Democratic-Party/308570/Slavery-and-the-emergence-of-the-bipartisan-system. 
  91. see "History of the Democratic Donkey"
  92. John William Ward (1962). Andrew Jackson: Symbol for an Age. Oxford Up. pp. 87–88. ISBN 9780199923205. https://archive.org/details/andrewjacksonsym0000ward. 
  93. "Barbour County, West Virginia General Election Ballot". November 4, 2008. http://www.wvsos.com/elections/ballots/barbourgen.pdf. 
  94. Seidman, Steven (June 12, 2010). "The Rooster as the Symbol of the U.S. Democratic Party". Ithaca College. http://www.ithaca.edu/rhp/programs/cmd/blogs/posters_and_election_propaganda/the_rooster_as_the_symbol_of_the_u.s._democratic_p/. 
  95. Lopez, Tomas (October 23, 2014). "Poor Ballot Design Hurts New York's Minor Parties ... Again". Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/poor-ballot-design-hurts-new-yorks-minor-parties-again. 
  96. Farhi, Paul (November 2, 2004). "Elephants Are Red, Donkeys Are Blue". Washington Post: p. C01. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17079-2004Nov1.html. 
  97. Trotter, Bill (February 11, 2008). "Obama sets sights on November battle". Bangor Daily News. http://www.bangornews.com/news/t/city.aspx?articleid=160039&zoneid=176. 
  98. Gruss, Michael (November 21, 2006). "Local roast becomes political pep rally for Democrats". The Virginian-Pilot. http://hamptonroads.com/node/185421. 
  99. Scherer, Michael (November 8, 2006). "The Democrats are ready to lead". Salon.com. https://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/11/08/pelosi/. 
  100. Schneider, Avie (22 January 2021). "DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison Wants To Build The 'Next Generation' Of Democratic Talent". NPR. https://www.npr.org/2021/01/22/959573611/dnc-chairman-jaime-harrison-wants-to-build-the-next-generation-of-democratic-tal. 
  101. Gilgoff, Dan (July 16, 2006). "Dean's List". U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060716/24dems.htm. 
  102. "Home". http://www.democraticmayors.org/. 
  103. John Ashworth, "Agrarians" & "aristocrats": Party political ideology in the United States, 1837–1846(1983)
  104. 106.0 106.1 106.2 "CNN. (2000). Exit Poll". http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/index.epolls.html. 
  105. 107.0 107.1 107.2 107.3 107.4 "CNN. (2004). Exit Poll". http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html. 
  106. 108.0 108.1 108.2 108.3 "CNN. (2006). Exit Poll". http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html. 
  107. Brownstein, Ronald (May 9, 2019). "The Democrats' Coalition Could Fundamentally Change by 2020". https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/05/democrats-progressive-agenda-and-2020-election/589066/. 
  108. Gidron, Noam; Ziblatt, Daniel (2019-05-11). "Center-Right Political Parties in Advanced Democracies" (in en). Annual Review of Political Science 22 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750. ISSN 1094-2939. 
  109. Grossman, Matt; Hopkins, David A. (2016). Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-062659-4. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001/acprof-9780190626594. 
  110. Lelkes, Yphtach; Sniderman, Paul M. (2016). "The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System" (in en). British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 825–844. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000404. ISSN 0007-1234. 
  111. Thompson, Derek (September 13, 2019). "How Democrats Conquered the City". https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/brief-history-how-democrats-conquered-city/597955/. 
  112. "About Us – New Democrat Coalition". http://newdemocratcoalition-kind.house.gov/about-me. 
  113. "How the DLC Does It" 18, 2011/https://web.archive.org/web/20110918040311/http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=how_the_dlc_does_it Archived September 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine., Robert Dreyfuss, American Prospect, April 23, 2001.
  114. 116.0 116.1 "Members – New Democrat Coalition". https://newdemocratcoalition-kind.house.gov/members. 
  115. Hale, Jon F. (January 1, 1995). "The Making of the New Democrats". Political Science Quarterly 110 (2): 207–232. doi:10.2307/2152360. JSTOR 2152360. 
  116. "NDN - A Progressive Think Tank and Advocacy Organization". http://ndn.org/. 
  117. "Senate New Democrat Coalition Members". New Democrrat Network. August 26, 2002. http://newdem.org/coalition/sndcmembers.shtml. 
  118. "Obama: 'I am a New Democrat'". Politico.com. http://www.politico.com/story/2009/03/obama-i-am-a-new-democrat-019862#ixzz3o9jykSUe. 
  119. Roger Chapman, Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia (2010) vol 1 Page 136
  120. 122.0 122.1 122.2 122.3 122.4 122.5 "Exit Polls". https://www.cnn.com/election/2018/exit-polls. 
  121. Judis, John B. (July 11, 2003). "The trouble with Howard Dean". Salon. Salon.com. http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/07/11/dean/index.html. 
  122. 124.0 124.1 "Pew Research Center. (May 10, 2005). Beyond Red vs. Blue, p. 1 of 8". 2005-05-10. http://people-press.org/2005/05/10/beyond-red-vs-blue/. 
  123. Kurtz, Howard (March 29, 2005). "College Faculties A Most Liberal Lot, Study Finds". The Washington Post. Washingtonpost.com. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8427-2005Mar28.html. 
  124. "Progressivism". Columbia Encyclopaedia. 2007. http://www.bartleby.com/65/pr/progrsvsm.html. 
  125. "Important Examples of Progressive Reforms". University of Michigan. http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~ppennock/Progressive%20Reforms.htm. 
  126. "Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is floating a 70 percent top tax rate — here's the research that backs her up". Mathew Yglesias. January 4, 2019. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/1/4/18168431/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-70-percent. 
  127. "Rent control in San Francisco: Everything you need to know". Bungalow team. https://bungalow.com/articles/rent-control-in-san-francisco-everything-you-need-to-know. 
  128. "Everybody wants to be him in 2020, but there's only one Bernie Sanders". Brenden Gallagher. February 24, 2019. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/bernie-sanders-2020-platform-issues/. 
  129. "Elizabeth Warren's 11 Commandments of Progressivism". National Journal. http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-s-11-commandments-of-progressivism-20140718. 
  130. "Issues". Pdacommunity.org. http://www.pdacommunity.org/issues. 
  131. "The Invisible Primary Against Hillary Clinton". National Journal. February 3, 2014. http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/the-invisible-primary-against-hillary-clinton-20140203. 
  132. McPherson, Lindsey (November 29, 2018). "Jayapal Joins Pocan As Co-Chair of Congressional Progressive Caucus". https://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/jayapal-joins-pocan-as-co-chair-of-congressional-progressive-caucus. 
  133. "Caucus Members". https://cpc-grijalva.house.gov/caucus-members/. 
  134. Sargent, Greg (March 13, 2014). "Push to expand Social Security (not cut it) gets another boost". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/03/13/push-to-expand-social-security-not-cut-it-gets-another-boost/. 
  135. Iacurci, Greg. "Biden's top tax rate on capital gains, dividends would be among highest in developed world". https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/21/biden-tax-plan-raises-top-capital-gains-dividend-tax-rate-to-among-highest-in-world.html. 
  136. 138.0 138.1 138.2 "On The Issues : Every Issue – Every Politician". Ontheissues.org. http://www.ontheissues.org/democratic_party.htm. 
  137. 139.0 139.1 139.2 139.3 Bacon, Perry Jr. (2019-05-28). "What Republicans And Democrats Are Doing In The States Where They Have Total Power" (in en-US). https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-republicans-and-democrats-are-doing-in-the-states-where-they-have-total-power/. 
  138. "Education". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/education. 
  139. "Health Care". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/health_care. 
  140. 142.0 142.1 142.2 142.3 142.4 142.5 "Democratic Party Platform 2016". https://www.demconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Democratic-Party-Platform-7.21.16-no-lines.pdf. 
  141. "Science & Technology". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/science_and_technology. 
  142. Isaac-Thomas, Bella (August 11, 2022). "What the Inflation Reduction Act does for green energy". https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/what-the-inflation-reduction-act-does-for-green-energy. 
  143. "THE ALLIANCE OF U.S. LABOR UNIONS AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY". Scholarsstrategynetwork.org. http://www.scholarsstrategynetwork.org/sites/default/files/ssn_basic_facts_schlozman_on_why_labor_unions_ally_with_the_democrats.pdf. 
  144. "Worker Rights". http://democrats.edworkforce.house.gov/issue/worker-rights. 
  145. Asma Khalid (June 9, 2014). "Obama Endorses Sen. Warren's Student Loan Refinancing Bill". wbur. http://www.wbur.org/2014/06/09/obama-warren-student-loan-refinancing. 
  146. Green, Erica (October 15, 2019). "House Democrats Unveil Plan to Make College More Affordable". https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/15/us/politics/house-democrats-higher-education.html. 
  147. "Democrats highlight equal pay in political push". CNN. April 7, 2014. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/04/07/democrats-highlight-equal-pay-in-political-push/. 
  148. Wyatt, Edward (November 10, 2014). "Obama Net Neutrality". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/11/technology/obama-net-neutrality-fcc.html. 
  149. 151.0 151.1 "Democratic Party on Government Reform". Ontheissues.org. http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Government_Reform.htm. 
  150. "A Call for Election Reform, Beginning with New York". The Huffington Post. June 15, 2013. https://huffingtonpost.com/nick-nyhart/a-call-for-election-refor_b_3443648.html. 
  151. "Voting Rights". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/voting_rights. 
  152. "For Torture and Surveillance Commission via H.R. 104, Target The Congressional Progressive Caucus". Irregular Times. http://irregulartimes.com/2009/04/27/for-torture-and-surveillance-commission-via-hr-104-target-the-congressional-progressive-caucus/. 
  153. "Democratic Party on Crime". Ontheissues.org. http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democratic_Party_Crime.htm. 
  154. 156.0 156.1 "Protecting Communities and Building Trust by Reforming Our Criminal Justice System". https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/protecting-communities-and-building-trust-by-reforming-our-criminal-justice-system/. 
  155. Grossmann, Matt; Mahmood, Zuhaib; Isaac, William (2021). "Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Unequal Class Influence in American Policy". The Journal of Politics 83 (4): 1706–1720. doi:10.1086/711900. ISSN 0022-3816. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/711900. 
  156. Bartels, Larry M. (2016). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age - Second Edition. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-8336-3. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/64558. 
  157. Rhodes, Jesse H.; Schaffner, Brian F. (2017). "Testing Models of Unequal Representation: Democratic Populists and Republican Oligarchs?". Quarterly Journal of Political Science 12 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1561/100.00016077. http://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/QJPS-16077. 
  158. Lax, Jeffrey R.; Phillips, Justin H.; Zelizer, Adam (2019). "The Party or the Purse? Unequal Representation in the US Senate" (in en). American Political Science Review 113 (4): 917–940. doi:10.1017/S0003055419000315. ISSN 0003-0554. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/party-or-the-purse-unequal-representation-in-the-us-senate/286BFEAA039374759DE14D782A0BB8DD. 
  159. Hacker, Jacob S.; Pierson, Paul (2020) (in en). Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality. Liveright Publishing. ISBN 978-1-63149-685-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=Kqu6DwAAQBAJ. 
  160. "Jobs and the Economy". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/economy_and_job_creation. 
  161. Dan Roberts (2014-04-19). "Wall Street deregulation pushed by Clinton advisers, documents reveal". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/19/wall-street-deregulation-clinton-advisers-obama. 
  162. Mudge, Stephanie (2018). Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 167–213. 
  163. "How High Should Taxes Be?". Economics.about.com. June 12, 2010. http://economics.about.com/od/monetaryandfiscalpolicy/a/high_taxes.htm. 
  164. "The Social Safety Net". usinfo.state.gov. http://usinfo.state.gov/infousa/government/social/ch9.htm. 
  165. "Day Two: House passes new budget rules". Associated Press. January 5, 2007. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/16487187. 
  166. 168.0 168.1 "The Democratic Party Platform". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/democratic-national-platform. 
  167. Kulwin, Noah (May 25, 2017). "Democrats just united on a $15-an-hour minimum wage". Vice. https://news.vice.com/story/democrats-just-united-on-a-15-an-hour-minimum-wage. 
  168. Freking, Kevin. "Biden, Democrats hit gas on push for $15 minimum wage". https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-business-rashida-tlaib-coronavirus-pandemic-minimum-wage-ee0e8cc7c96a30d9581723b2c6bb4189. 
  169. Marr, Chris. "Blue State Minimum Wages Inch Upward, Widening Gap With South". https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/blue-state-minimum-wages-inch-upward-widening-gap-with-south. 
  170. Goodnough, Abby; Kaplan, Thomas (June 28, 2019). "Democrat vs. Democrat: How Health Care Is Dividing the Party". https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/28/health/democratic-debate-healthcare.html. 
  171. Nova, Annie (December 29, 2019). "How the Affordable Care Act transformed our health-care system". https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/29/how-the-affordable-care-act-transformed-the-us-health-care-system.html. 
  172. "Moving America Forward 2012 Democratic National Platform". presidency.ucsb.edu. September 14, 2012. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/papers_pdf/101962.pdf. 
  173. "Clinton Joins Key Senate Democrats to Release Report on "The College Cost Crunch"". clinton.senate.gov. June 28, 2006. http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=258005. 
  174. "Agenda — Environment". http://www.democrats.org/a/national/clean_environment/. 
  175. Coley, Jonathan S.; Hess, David J. (2012). "Green energy laws and Republican legislators in the United States" (in en). Energy Policy 48: 576–583. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.062. ISSN 0301-4215. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512004752. 
  176. Bergquist, Parrish; Warshaw, Christopher (2020). "Elections and parties in environmental politics" (in en-US). Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy: 126–141. doi:10.4337/9781788972840.00017. ISBN 9781788972840. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788972833/9781788972833.00017.xml. 
  177. "Democratic Party on Environment". http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Democratic_Party_Environment.htm. 
  178. "Energy Independence". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/energy_independence. 
  179. Sullivan, Sean (June 2, 2014). "Coal state Democrats to Obama: Curb emissions? Um, no thanks.". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/06/02/coal-state-democrats-to-obama-curb-emissions-um-no-thanks/. 
  180. Rorty, R. (1997). Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought In Twentieth Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-674-00312-8
  181. Weisman, Jonathan (July 6, 2005). "CAFTA Reflects Democrats' Shift From Trade Bills". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/05/AR2005070501345_pf.html. 
  182. Carmines, Edward G.; Stimson, James A. "Racial Issues and The Structure of Mass Belief Systems," Journal of Politics (1982) 44#1 pp 2–20 in JSTOR
  183. Talmadge Anderson; James Benjamin Stewart (2007). Introduction to African American Studies: Transdisciplinary Approaches and Implications. Black Classic Press. p. 205. ISBN 9781580730396. https://books.google.com/books?id=49tXR1Ok6poC&pg=PA205. 
  184. Jeffrey M. Stonecash (2010). New Directions in American Political Parties. Routledge. p. 131. ISBN 9781135282059. https://books.google.com/books?id=ZNuOAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA131. 
  185. "Civil Rights". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/issues/civil_rights. 
  186. Deborah White. "Liberalism 101: Democratic Party Agenda on Electoral Reform". About. http://usliberals.about.com/od/electionreform/a/VotingAgenda.htm. 
  187. "House Votes on 2003-530". Ontheissues.org. October 2, 2003. http://www.ontheissues.org/HouseVote/Party_2003-530.htm. 
  188. "Abortion". Pollingreport.com. http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm. 
  189. "2020 Democratic Party Platform". https://www.demconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/2020-07-31-Democratic-Party-Platform-For-Distribution.pdf. 
  190. Frumin, Aliyah (November 25, 2013). "Obama: 'Long past time' for immigration reform". MSNBC.com. https://msnbc.com/hardball/obama-long-past-time-reform. 
  191. "U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote". Senate.gov. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00167. 
  192. 196.0 196.1 Igielnik, Ruth (November 16, 2022). "Backdrop for Vote on Same-Sex Marriage Rights: A Big Shift in Public Opinion". https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/16/us/politics/same-sex-marriage-public-opinion.html. 
  193. Lindberg, Tim (August 2, 2022). "Congress is considering making same-sex marriage federal law – a political scientist explains how this issue became less polarized over time" (in en-US). https://theconversation.com/congress-is-considering-making-same-sex-marriage-federal-law-a-political-scientist-explains-how-this-issue-became-less-polarized-over-time-187509. 
  194. "Changing Views on Social Issues". April 30, 2009. https://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1089a6HotButtonIssues.pdf. 
  195. "Civil Rights". pollingreport.com. http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm. 
  196. Less Opposition to Gay Marriage, Adoption and Military Service 10, 2011/https://web.archive.org/web/20110310052909/http://people-press.org/report/273/less-opposition-to-gay-marriage-adoption-and-military-service Archived March 10, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.. Pew Research Center. March 22, 2006.
  197. Morales, Lymari (June 5, 2009). "Conservatives Shift in Favor of Openly Gay Service Members". Gallup.com. http://www.gallup.com/poll/120764/conservatives-shift-favor-openly-gay-service-members.aspx. 
  198. "The 2004 Democratic National Platform for America". http://www.democrats.org/pdfs/2004platform.pdf.  (111 KB)
  199. Garcia, Michelle (April 22, 2012). "Is This the Year Democrats Embrace Marriage Equality?". Advocate.com. http://www.advocate.com/print-issue/advance/2012/04/22/year-democrats-embrace-marriage-equality. 
  200. "Obama backs same-sex marriage". CBS News. May 9, 2012. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57431122-503544/obama-backs-same-sex-marriage/. 
  201. Sam Stein (May 9, 2012). "Obama Backs Gay Marriage". The Huffington Post. https://huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/obama-gay-marriage_n_1503245.html. 
  202. 206.0 206.1 "Same-sex Marriage - Issues - Election Center 2008 - CNN.com". Cnn.com. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.samesexmarriage.html. 
  203. Obama Opposes Gay Marriage Ban 26, 2011/https://web.archive.org/web/20110926223051/http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/02/obama_opposes_gay_marriage_ban.html Archived September 26, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.. The Washington Post. By Perry Bacon Jr. July 2, 2008.
  204. Obama Statement on Vote Against Constitutional Amendment to Ban Gay Marriage 8, 2008/https://web.archive.org/web/20081208020010/http://obama.senate.gov/press/060607-obama_statement_26/index.php Archived December 8, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.. United States Senate Official Website 28, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20161228084718/http://www.senate.gov/ Archived December 28, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.. June 7, 2006.
  205. Linkins, Jason (January 13, 2009). "Obama Once Supported Same-Sex Marriage 'Unequivocally'". Huffingtonpost.com. https://huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/13/obama-once-supported-same_n_157656.html. 
  206. "Video: Clinton shifts on gay marriage". CNN. September 25, 2009. http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/25/video-clinton-shifts-on-gay-marriage/. 
  207. Raushenbush, Paul (March 19, 2012). "President Jimmy Carter Authors New Bible Book, Answers Hard Biblical Questions". The Huffington Post. https://huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/19/president-jimmy-carter-bible-book_n_1349570.html. 
  208. "Gay men and women should have the same rights // Current". Current.com. January 17, 2008. http://current.com/items/88817757_gay-men-and-women-should-have-the-same-rights.htm. 
  209. Israel, Josh (May 16, 2013). "Mondale and Dukakis Back Marriage Equality". https://thinkprogress.org/mondale-dukakis-back-marriage-equality-joining-every-living-democratic-presidential-nominee-56a1d402991d/. 
  210. Cournoyer, Caroline (May 7, 2012). "Joe Biden Endorses Gay Marriage". https://www.governing.com/archive/Joseph-Biden-Endorses-Gay-Marriage.html. 
  211. "Amid a Series of Mass Shootings in the U.S., Gun Policy Remains Deeply Divisive". April 20, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/04/20/amid-a-series-of-mass-shootings-in-the-u-s-gun-policy-remains-deeply-divisive/. 
  212. "THE DRAFT 2008 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL PLATFORM: RENEWING AMERICA'S PROMISE". http://www.queerty.com/wp/docs/2008/08/2008-democratic-platform-080808.pdf. 
  213. Clyde, Don; Miranda, Shauneen (June 25, 2022). "Biden signs gun safety bill into law". https://www.npr.org/2022/06/25/1107626030/biden-signs-gun-safety-law. 
  214. "1972 Democratic Party Platform". July 11, 1972. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/1972-democratic-party-platform. 
  215. "Obama Backs Death Penalty for Child Rapists" 27, 2009/https://web.archive.org/web/20090527012457/http://www.newser.com/story/30953/obama-backs-death-penalty-for-child-rapists.html Archived May 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.. Newser, June 26, 2008. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  216. "The Candidates on the Death Penalty". Pew Research Center. http://pewforum.org/religion08/compare.php?Issue=Death_Penalty. 
  217. "Democratic Platform Drafting Meeting Concludes". DNCC. June 25, 2016. https://demconvention.com/news/democratic-platform-drafting-meeting-concludes/. 
  218. Tyson, Alec (January 26, 2017). "Americans divided in views of use of torture in U.S. anti-terror efforts". https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/26/americans-divided-in-views-of-use-of-torture-in-u-s-anti-terror-efforts/. 
  219. Kenneth T. Walsh. "Obama and Democrats' Torture Problem". U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/obama/articles/2009/05/22/obama-and-democrats-torture-problem. 
  220. "Senate roll call on passage of the PATRIOT Act". Senate.gov. April 25, 2017. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00313. 
  221. "House approves Patriot Act renewal". https://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/patriot.act/. 
  222. "1972 Democratic Party Platform". https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/1972-democratic-party-platform. 
  223. Ashtari, Shadee (November 6, 2013). "Here's The Medieval-Sounding Sodomy Law That Helped Ken Cuccinelli Lose In Virginia". Huffington Post. https://huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/06/ken-cuccinelli-sodomy_n_4226708.html. 
  224. "Republicans, Democrats Agree on Top Foreign Policy Goals". Gallup.com. February 20, 2013. http://www.gallup.com/poll/160649/republicans-democrats-agree-top-foreign-policy-goals.aspx. 
  225. See "July 3, 2014 – Iraq – Getting In Was Wrong; Getting Out Was Right, U.S. Voters Tell Quinnipiac University National Poll" Quinnipiac University Poll 2, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20160402190652/http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2057 Archived April 2, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. item #51
  226. "Archive page #16 of polls". Pollingreport.com. June 1, 2003. http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq16.htm. 
  227. "Archive page #15 of polls". Pollingreport.com. http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq15.htm. 
  228. Pew Research Center: Along the Iraq-Vietnam Parallel 16, 2012/https://web.archive.org/web/20121016232233/http://pewresearch.org/pubs/579/iraq-vietnam Archived October 16, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.. Pew Research Center. August 28, 2007.
  229. Recent polls from 5, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20161205075857/http://www.pollingreport.com/iraq.htm Archived December 5, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Pollingreport 11, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20161211210554/http://www.pollingreport.com/ Archived December 11, 2016, at the Wayback Machine..
  230. Flaherty, Anne (April 26, 2007). "Congress passes Iraq bill, veto awaits". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/04/26/veto_awaits_iraq_troop_withdrawal_bill/. 
  231. "US Democrats push for 2008 Iraq exit". Reuters. April 26, 2007. http://news.brisbanetimes.com.au/us-democrats-push-for-2008-iraq-exit/20075426-9l4.html. 
  232. "Democrats fail to override Bush on war funding". International Herald Tribune. May 2, 2007. http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/02/africa/prexy.php. 
  233. 238.0 238.1 Obama says conditions to dictate final Iraq force 10, 2009/https://web.archive.org/web/20090110211722/http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2639269420080727 Archived January 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.. Reuters. July 27, 2008.
  234. 239.0 239.1 239.2 Top Republicans embrace Iraq plan 13, 2012/https://web.archive.org/web/20121013190657/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19410.html Archived October 13, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.. The Politico. February 27, 2009.
  235. Gordon, Michael R. (November 23, 2013). "Accord Reached With Iran to Halt Nuclear Program". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/world/middleeast/talks-with-iran-on-nuclear-deal-hang-in-balance.html. 
  236. "Jewish Democratic donors urge Congress: Back off Iran sanctions". Haaretz.com. February 28, 2014. http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/.premium-1.577070. 
  237. Cortellessa, Eric. "Democratic Party passes resolution calling for US to re-enter Iran nuke deal" (in en-US). https://www.timesofisrael.com/democratic-party-passes-resolution-calling-for-us-to-re-enter-iran-nuke-deal/. 
  238. "Democrats say McCain forgot Afghanistan". Boston Globe. July 24, 2008. Retrieved August 23, 2008. 20, 2008/https://web.archive.org/web/20080820113620/http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/07/democrats_say_m_1.html Archived August 20, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  239. 244.0 244.1 "John McCain & Barack Obama urge Afghanistan surge" 13, 2009/https://web.archive.org/web/20091113131424/http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/07/15/2008-07-15_john_mccain__barack_obama_urge_afghanist.html Archived November 13, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.. New York Daily News. July 15, 2008. Retrieved August 23, 2008.
  240. "U.S. plans major shift to advisory role in Afghanistan", Los Angeles Times, December 13, 2011 19, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20160819153404/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2011/12/us-plans-major-shift-to-advisory-role-in-afghanistan.html Archived August 19, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.
  241. 246.0 246.1 Most Americans oppose Afghanistan war: poll 10, 2009/https://web.archive.org/web/20090810102232/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25895398-12335,00.html Archived August 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine.. The Australian. August 7, 2009. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
  242. 247.0 247.1 "Afghan War Edges Out Iraq as Most Important for U.S." 24, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20161224202906/http://www.gallup.com/poll/109150/Afghan-War-Edges-Iraq-Most-Important-US.aspx Archived December 24, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. by Frank Newport. Gallup. July 30, 2008. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
  243. Public Opinion in U.S. Turns Against Afghan War 25, 2017/https://web.archive.org/web/20171025072529/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/19/AR2009081903066.html Archived October 25, 2017, at the Wayback Machine.. By Jennifer Agiesta and Jon Cohen. Washington Post. August 20, 2009. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
  244. "Joe Biden: I Promise To 'End The Forever Wars In Afghanistan And Middle East' As President" (in en-US). https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/joe-biden-i-promise-to-end-the-forever-wars-in-afghanistan-and-middle-east-as-president/. 
  245. "Biden to pull US troops from Afghanistan, end 'forever war'" (in en). https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-troop-withdrawal-afghanistan-september-11-d2c7426736f9f530e0e62f2295a44d28. 
  246. Liebermann, Nicole Gaouette,Jennifer Hansler,Barbara Starr,Oren (2021-08-30). "The last US military planes have left Afghanistan, marking the end of the United States' longest war | CNN Politics" (in en). https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/30/politics/us-military-withdraws-afghanistan/index.html. 
  247. 252.0 252.1 Americans' Most and Least Favored Nations 9, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20160909115334/http://www.gallup.com/poll/104734/Americans-Most-Least-Favored-Nations.aspx Archived September 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.. By Lydia Saad. Gallup. March 3, 2008.
  248. 253.0 253.1 Left could push pro-Israel voters to GOP 7, 2013/https://web.archive.org/web/20131207213523/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0707/4986.html Archived December 7, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.. By Jennifer Rubin. Politico. July 18, 2007.
  249. "Renewing America's Promise: Democratic Party Platform, 2008". Democrats.org. http://www.democrats.org/a/party/platform.html. 
  250. "Ideological Gaps Over Israel on Both Sides of Atlantic". PewGlobal.org. January 29, 2009. http://www.pewglobal.org/2009/01/29/ideology-and-views-toward-the-middle-east-conflict/. 
  251. 256.0 256.1 Kendall Breitman (February 23, 2015). "Gallup poll: Democrats losing sympathy for Israel". POLITICO. http://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/democrats-israel-palestine-gallup-poll-115419.html. 
  252. "Clinton, Sanders supporters differ sharply on U.S. global role" (in en-US). Pew Research Center. 2016-05-17. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/05/17/clinton-sanders-supporters-differ-sharply-on-u-s-global-role/. 
  253. "Democrats Reject Platform Proposal Calling for 'End to Occupation and Illegal Settlements'" (in en). Haaretz. 2016-06-25. https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/democrats-reject-sanders-platform-changes-on-palestinians-1.5401124. 
  254. "Michigan candidate backs 1-state solution, slashing military aid to Israel" (in en-US). https://www.timesofisrael.com/michigan-candidate-of-palestinian-heritage-rejects-2-state-solution/. 
  255. "Ilhan Omar, who once called Israel an 'apartheid regime,' wins congressional primary in Minnesota | Jewish Telegraphic Agency" (in en-US). 2018-08-15. https://www.jta.org/2018/08/15/news-opinion/ilhan-omar-called-israel-apartheid-regime-wins-congressional-primary-minnesota. 
  256. "Muslim Trailblazer Ilhan Omar Admits She Backs BDS — Now That Election Is Over". The Forward. https://forward.com/news/national/414050/muslim-trailblazer-ilhan-omar-admits-she-backs-bds-now-that-election-is/. 
  257. 262.0 262.1 262.2
  258. 263.0 263.1 263.2 Levitz, Eric (2021-09-29). "Is America Too Rich for Class Politics?" (in en-us). https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/09/is-america-too-rich-for-class-politics.html. "In every presidential election from 1948 to 2012, white voters in the top 5 percent of America’s income distribution were more Republican than those in the bottom 95 percent. Now, the opposite is true: Among white Americans, the rich voted to the left of the middle class and the poor in 2016 and 2020, while the poor voted to the right of the middle class and the rich... The erosion of traditional class allegiances in voting — a phenomenon some have dubbed “class dealignment” — has been most stark among white voters. But in 2020, the phenomenon crossed racial lines. According to the Pew Research Center, Joe Biden won college-educated Hispanic voters by 25 points more than he did non-college-educated ones." 
  259. Tyson, Alec; Maniam, Shiva (November 9, 2016). "Behind Trump's victory: Divisions by race, gender and education". Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/. 
  260. Abramowitz, Alan (September 23, 2021). "Can Democrats Win Back the White Working Class?" (in en-US). https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/can-democrats-win-back-the-white-working-class/. 
  261. Template:Cite interview
  262. 269.0 269.1 Zitner, Aaron; Mena, Bryan (September 14, 2022). "Latino Voters, Once Solidly Democratic, Split Along Economic Lines" (in en-US). https://www.wsj.com/articles/latino-voters-republican-midterm-elections-11663166135. 
  263. Franck, Thomas (November 10, 2020). "Democratic counties represent 70% of U.S. GDP, 2020 election shows" (in en). https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/10/election-2020-democrats-republicans-economy.html. 
  264. Judis, J. B.; Teixeira, R. (June 19, 2007). "Back to the Future". The American Prospect. http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=back_to_the_future061807. Retrieved August 19, 2007. 
  265. "Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media Section 4: Scientists, Politics and Religion" 10, 2011/https://web.archive.org/web/20110310163411/http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=1549 Archived March 10, 2011, at the Wayback Machine..
  266. 273.0 273.1 "Exit Polls – Election Results 2008". The New York Times. November 5, 2008. http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/national-exit-polls.html. 
  267. "Local Exit Polls - Election Center 2008 - Elections & Politics from CNN.com". CNN. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1. 
  268. Fried, Joseph, Democrats and Republicans: Rhetoric and Reality (New York: Algora Publishing, 2008), 126.
  269. O'Kane, Caitlin. "Jon Ossoff becomes the youngest Democrat elected to the Senate since Joe Biden in 1973". https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jon-ossoff-youngest-democrat-senator-since-joe-biden/. 
  270. Wise, Alana (January 6, 2021). "Jon Ossoff Wins Georgia Runoff, Handing Democrats Senate Control". https://www.npr.org/2021/01/06/952417689/democrat-jon-ossoff-claims-victory-over-david-perdue-in-georgia-runoff. 
  271. "Nagourney, A. (June 27, 2007). Young Americans are leaning left, new poll finds. The New York Times". https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/washington/27poll.html. 
  272. "The future is female: How the growing political power of women will remake American politics". February 19, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2020/02/19/the-future-is-female-how-the-growing-political-power-of-women-will-remake-american-politics/. 
  273. Cohen, Ethan; Stark, Liz; Levy, Adam. "117th Congress: Breaking down the historic numbers". https://www.cbs58.com/news/117th-congress-breaking-down-the-historic-numbers. 
  274. "Women in the U.S. House of Representatives 2021". July 9, 2015. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/women-us-house-representatives-2021. 
  275. 283.0 283.1 Fried, Joseph. (2008). Democrats and Republicans—rhetoric and reality : comparing the voters in statistics and anecdote. New York: Algora Pub.. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-87586-603-1. https://books.google.com/books?id=QYJNBAAAQBAJ. Retrieved April 28, 2020. 
  276. 284.0 284.1 "Gay Support for Obama Similar to Dems in Past Elections". Law.ucla.edu. November 26, 2008. http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/press/GaySupportForObamaSimilarToDemsInPastElections.html. 
  277. Cohen, Micah (November 15, 2012). "Gay Vote Proved a Boon for Obama". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/us/politics/gay-vote-seen-as-crucial-in-obamas-victory.html. 
  278. "National Voter Surveys: How Different Groups Voted". November 3, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/ap-polls-national.html. 
  279. "Members". Congressional LGBT Equality Caucus. https://lgbt-cicilline.house.gov/members. 
  280. Bennett, Geoff; Golden, Amanda; Talbot, Haley; Smith, Allan. "Biden to nominate Pete Buttigieg for transportation secretary". https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-nominate-pete-buttigieg-transportation-secretary-n1251291. 
  281. Shephardson, David (February 2, 2021). "Pete Buttigieg becomes first openly gay cabinet secretary confirmed by U.S. Senate". https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-biden-transportation/pete-buttigieg-becomes-first-openly-gay-cabinet-secretary-confirmed-by-u-s-senate-idUSKBN2A22IQ. 
  282. 290.0 290.1 290.2 Jackson, Brooks (2008-04-18). "Blacks and the Democratic Party". FactCheck.org. http://www.factcheck.org/2008/04/blacks-and-the-democratic-party/. 
  283. "Ku Klux Klan – History". Anti-Defamation League. http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/kkk/history.asp?LEARN_Cat=Extremism&LEARN_SubCat=Extremism_in_America&xpicked=4&item=kkk. 
  284. Teixeira, Ruy (November 11, 2008). "Digging into the 2008 Exit Polls". Taking Note. http://takingnote.tcf.org/2008/11/digging-into-th.html. 
  285. "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People". encyclopedia.com. http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/National_Association_for_the_Advancement_of_Colored_People.aspx. 
  286. "Membership". United States House of Representatives. https://cbc.house.gov/membership/. 
  287. Cillizza, Chris (September 18, 2011). "With Hispanic support for Obama waning, could Latino vote be up for grabs in 2012?". The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/with-hispanic-support-for-obama-waning-could-latino-vote-be-up-for-grabs-in-2012/2011/09/18/gIQAG9KUdK_story.html. 
  288. "Latino vote key to Obama's re-election". CNN. November 9, 2012. http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/09/politics/latino-vote-key-election/index.html. 
  289. Cave, Damien (April 21, 2009). "U.S. Overtures Find Support Among Cuban-Americans". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/us/21miami.html. 
  290. Woods, Casey (November 6, 2008). "Presidential and Congressional Candidate Cuba Watch: Analysis of Cuban American vote" 11, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20161011130541/http://candidatecubawatch.blogspot.com/2008/11/analysis-of-cuban-american-vote.html Archived October 11, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.. Candidatecubawatch.blogspot.com. Retrieved July 15, 2013.
  291. Jamerson, Joshua; Zitner, Aaron (November 7, 2022). "GOP Gaining Support Among Black and Latino Voters" (in en-US). https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-gaining-support-among-black-and-latino-voters-wsj-poll-finds-11667822481. 
  292. "Dissecting the 2008 Electorate: Most Diverse in U.S. History 18, 2012/https://web.archive.org/web/20120618075224/http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1209/racial-ethnic-voters-presidential-election?&proj=peoplepress Archived June 18, 2012, at the Wayback Machine.". Pew Research Center. April 30, 2009
  293. "Presidential Race – 2012 Election Center – President: Full Results – Exit Polls". CNN. November 15, 2012. http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/race/president#exit-polls. 
  294. "85% Indian-Americans support Obama for second term: Survey 16, 2013/https://web.archive.org/web/20130116183645/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-05-06/us-canada-news/31596885_1_indian-americans-asian-americans-asian-american-pacific-islander Archived January 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.". The Times Of India. May 6, 2012.
  295. "Paying Attention to the Native American Vote". https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/election2008/2008/11/paying-attention-to-the-n.html. 
  296. Dems woo Native American vote 5, 2013/https://web.archive.org/web/20131205183555/http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10676.html Archived December 5, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.. Politico. May 29, 2008.
  297. Watkins, Eli (November 7, 2018). "First Native American women elected to Congress: Sharice Davids and Deb Haaland". https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/06/politics/sharice-davids-and-deb-haaland-native-american-women/index.html. 
  298. Taylor, Rory (December 3, 2018). "Lieutenant Governor-Elect of Minnesota Peggy Flanagan Becomes the Highest-Ranking Native Woman Elected to Executive Office in the United States". https://www.teenvogue.com/story/lieutenant-governor-of-minnesota-peggy-flanagan. 
  299. Walsh, Andrew D. (2000) (in en). Religion, Economics, and Public Policy: Ironies, Tragedies, and Absurdities of the Contemporary Culture Wars. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 81–83. ISBN 978-0-275-96611-9. https://books.google.com/books?id=NBs313dbCQQC&pg=PA82. 
  300. 308.0 308.1 Lawson, Alan (24 July 2006) (in en). A Commonwealth of Hope: The New Deal Response to Crisis. JHU Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-8018-8872-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=Ffe9hAlbC2sC&pg=PT19. Retrieved 15 November 2020. 
  301. O'Kane, Caitlin. "Joe Biden to become the second Catholic president ever, following JFK". https://www.cbsnews.com/news/joe-biden-second-catholic-president-jfk/. 
  302. Steinhauer, Jennifer (September 21, 2015). "In Pelosi, Strong Catholic Faith and Abortion Rights Coexist". https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/us/politics/in-pelosi-strong-catholic-faith-and-abortion-rights-coexist.html. 
  303. "National Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted". The New York Times. November 3, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-president.html. 
  304. 312.0 312.1 Rani, Rikha Sharma (3 August 2020). "Could These Evangelical Democrats Change the Party?" (in en). POLITICO. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/08/03/evangelical-democrats-390976. 
  305. Lipka, Michael; Smith, Gregory A. (January 31, 2020). "Among Democrats, Christians lean toward Biden, while 'nones' prefer Sanders". https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/01/31/among-democrats-christians-lean-toward-biden-while-nones-prefer-sanders/. 
  306. Sherwood, Harriet (October 9, 2020). "Faith leaders back Biden in sign that evangelical support for Trump is waning" (in en). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/09/faith-leaders-back-biden-evangelicals-trump. 
  307. "Faith on the Hill: The religious composition of the 116th Congress". Pew Research Center. January 3, 2019. https://www.pewforum.org/2019/01/03/faith-on-the-hill-116/. 
  308. "Secular Coalition Flunks U.S. House on Religious Freedom Issues". secular.org. http://secular.org/content/secular-coalition-flunks-us-house-religious-freedom-issues. 
  309. "Local Exit Polls - Election Center 2008 - Elections & Politics from CNN.com". CNN. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#val=USP00p2. 
  310. "An inaugural first: Obama acknowledges 'non-believers'". USA Today. January 22, 2009. https://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2009-01-20-obama-non-believers_N.htm. 
  311. "2012 Presidential Primary Candidate Scorecard". secular.org. http://secular.org/content/2012-presidental-candidate-scorecard. 
  312. "National Results 2020 President exit polls." (in en). https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/exit-polls/president/national-results. 
  313. "Barack Obama wins 77 percent of Jewish vote, exit polls show 9, 2016/https://web.archive.org/web/20160509024804/http://www.haaretz.com/news/barack-obama-wins-77-percent-of-jewish-vote-exit-polls-show-1.256651 Archived May 9, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.". Haaretz Daily. November 5, 2008.
  314. Survey. American Jewish Committee September 2008. Retrieved April 30, 2009.
  315. 323.0 323.1 Arab-American Voters Say Iraq Top Issue in 2008 Campaign. By Mohamed Elshinnawi. Voice of America. July 23, 2007, 13, 2008/https://web.archive.org/web/20080313045105/http://www.voanews.com/english/archive/2007-07/2007-07-23-voa41.cfm Archived March 13, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
  316. Mideast, Civil Liberties Concern Arab-Americans 7, 2007/https://web.archive.org/web/20070807043022/http://www.aaiusa.org/press-room/2045/mustread072003 Archived August 7, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.. By James Q. Lynch. The Gazette (Cedar Rapids-Iowa City). Reprinted by the Arab-American Institute . July 19, 2003
  317. "American Muslims supported Obama: poll 16, 2013/https://web.archive.org/web/20130116192112/http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/american-muslims-support-obama-poll/192790/on Archived January 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.". Business Standard. October 25, 2012.
  318. "American Muslims' political and social views" (in en-US). 2017-07-26. https://www.pewforum.org/2017/07/26/political-and-social-views/. 
  319. "12 of the First Arab Americans" (in en). 2021-01-29. https://www.arabamerica.com/12-first-arab-americans/. 

Further reading

  • Hilton, Adam. True Blues: The Contentious Transformation of the Democratic Party (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021), since 1972.
  • Kazin, Michael. What It Took to Win: A History of the Democratic Party (2022) excerpt
  • Landis, Michael Todd. Northern Men with Southern Loyalties: The Democratic Party and the Sectional Crisis. (Cornell UP, 2014).
  • Lawrence, David G. The collapse of the democratic presidential majority: Realignment, dealignment, and electoral change from Franklin Roosevelt to Bill Clinton. (Westview Press, 1997).
  • McGuire, John Thomas (2014). "Beginning an 'Extraordinary Opportunity': Eleanor Roosevelt, Molly Dewson, and the expansion of women's boundaries in the Democratic Party, 1924–1934". Women's History Review 23 (6): 922–937. doi:10.1080/09612025.2014.906841. 
  • Maisel, L. Sandy, and Jeffrey M. Berry, eds. The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups (Oxford UP, 2010).
  • Mieczkowski, Yanek, and Mark C Carnes. The Routledge historical atlas of presidential elections (2001).
  • Neal, Steven. Happy Days are Here Again: The 1932 Democratic Convention, the Emergence of FDR—and how America was Changed Forever (Harper Collins, 2010).
  • Remini, Robert V. Martin Van Buren and the making of the Democratic Party (Columbia UP, 1961).
  • Savage, Sean J. Roosevelt: The Party Leader, 1932–1945 (U Press of Kentucky, 2015).
  • Savage, Sean J. JFK, LBJ, and the Democratic Party (SUNY Press, 2012).
  • Savage, Sean J. Truman and the Democratic Party (U Press of Kentucky, 2015).
  • Woods, Randall B. Prisoners of Hope: Lyndon B. Johnson, the Great Society, and the Limits of Liberalism (Basic Books, 2016).
</dl>

External links

Template:Prone to spam

Template:Democratic Party (United States) Template:United States political parties Template:United States topics Template:Martin Van Buren

[create] Documentation


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "note", but no corresponding <references group="note"/> tag was found, or a closing </ref> is missing